The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Despite the opposition, the government supports visible minorities in their integration<br />
in<strong>to</strong> Canadian society. 286<br />
After 9/11, the Canadian courts have ruled consistently with this approach. <strong>The</strong><br />
Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Canada concluded that <strong>Sikh</strong> students can carry kirpans <strong>to</strong> schools. 287<br />
<strong>The</strong> Court specifically held<br />
an absolute prohibition against wearing a kirpan infringes the freedom <strong>of</strong><br />
religion <strong>of</strong> the student in question under [section] 2(a) <strong>of</strong> the Canadian<br />
Charter <strong>of</strong> Rights and Freedoms [hereinafter Canadian Charter]. <strong>The</strong><br />
infringement cannot be justified under [section] 1 <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Charter,<br />
since it has not been shown that such a prohibition minimally impairs the<br />
student’s rights. 288<br />
Similarly, a postsecondary student in Quebec, Canada, “was <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>to</strong> remove her<br />
hijab at College Jean-Eudes[.]” 289 In response, the Quebec Human Rights Commission<br />
ruled that “religious schools admitting students from more than one faith must make<br />
reasonable efforts <strong>to</strong> accommodate all their pupils’ beliefs”—irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether they<br />
are public or private institutions. 290<br />
A 2006 shooting spree in French-speaking Montreal, Canada by an immigrant<br />
<strong>Sikh</strong> challenged Canada’s multicultural ideal. On September 16, 2006, Globe and Mail<br />
columnist Jan Wong argued that the young man killed because <strong>of</strong> an alienation from<br />
Quebec’s francophone society, which explains not only this rampage, but also others that<br />
occurred in Quebec’s recent past. 291 <strong>The</strong> Montreal Gazette rejected Wong’s argument in<br />
clear terms:<br />
<strong>The</strong> foolishness <strong>of</strong> her deduction was confirmed by the lack <strong>of</strong> evidence <strong>to</strong><br />
support it. In none <strong>of</strong> the cases . . . was there even the slightest tangible<br />
286<br />
See M. Neil Browne & Michael D. Meuti, Individualism and the Market<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> Women’s Wages in the United States, Canada, and Hong Kong, 21<br />
LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 355, 383-386 (July, 1999); Jason R. Wiener, Note,<br />
Neighbors up North: Nunavut’s Incorporation in Canada as a Model for Multicultural<br />
Democracy, 28 SUFFOLK TRANSNAT'L L. REV. 267, 297-98 (2005).<br />
287 Multani v. Comm’n Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, supra note 21.<br />
288 Id.<br />
289 Private schools can reject hijab, MONTREAL GAZETTE, Oct. 5, 2005, at A5.<br />
290 Id.<br />
291 Jan Wong, Get under the desk, GLOBE AND MAIL, Sept. 16, 2006, at A8.<br />
51