15.11.2013 Views

The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith

The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith

The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

writing in defense <strong>of</strong> pluralism and the religious freedom <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong>s. 21 That said, this<br />

<strong>Article</strong> discusses ongoing challenges <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Sikh</strong> turban despite these efforts. Moreover,<br />

remaining challenges may intensify and new ones may arise if future attacks occur. Thus,<br />

attempts <strong>to</strong> foster understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong> identity and the <strong>Sikh</strong> experience continue <strong>to</strong> be<br />

relevant and necessary. 22<br />

21 See U.S. v. James, 328 F.3d 953, 957 (7th Cir. 2003) (“Tolerance usually is the best<br />

course in a pluralistic nation. Accommodation <strong>of</strong> religiously inspired conduct is a <strong>to</strong>ken<br />

<strong>of</strong> respect for, and a beacon <strong>of</strong> welcome <strong>to</strong>, those whose beliefs differ from the<br />

majority’s[.]”). See also Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, Multani<br />

c. Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 264 D.L.R. 4th 577 (2006) (<strong>The</strong> Court held that “an absolute<br />

prohibition against wearing a kirpan infringes the freedom <strong>of</strong> religion <strong>of</strong> the student in<br />

question under section 2(a) <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Charter <strong>of</strong> Rights and Freedoms [hereinafter<br />

Canadian Charter]. <strong>The</strong> infringement cannot be justified under section 1 <strong>of</strong> the Canadian<br />

Charter, since it has not been shown that such a prohibition minimally impairs the<br />

student’s rights.”).<br />

22 <strong>The</strong> potential for racial violence arguably exists as long as the possibility <strong>of</strong> war or<br />

crisis exists, thus rendering individual incidents <strong>of</strong> a backlash worthy <strong>of</strong> our attention,<br />

such that we may learn from our mistakes and refuse in the future <strong>to</strong> manifest national<br />

anger, fear, and ignorance in the form <strong>of</strong> discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry actions. See William H.<br />

Rehnquist, ALL THE LAWS BUT ONE: CIVIL LIBERTIES IN WARTIME 221 (2000) (arguing<br />

that the nation’s past will not repeat itself); see also Mark V. Tushnet, Defending<br />

Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime, 2003 WIS. L. REV. 273, 273<br />

(2003) (arguing that we have learned from our past mistakes only not <strong>to</strong> repeat those<br />

precise mistakes, rather than more general lessons).<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!