Zemes un vides zinātnes Earth and Environment Sciences - Latvijas ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

92 ADVANCES IN PALAEOICHTHYOLOGY Table I. Taphonomical, environmental and assemblage structure data on the localities and assemblages of the Devonian tetrapods Table I includes information on 8 known tetrapod localities and on two others in which tetrapods are unknown, used for comparative purposes (Rybnitsa in Oryol Region, Russia and Ala-Archa, Kirghizstan). The Rybnitsa locality is known to render a vertebrate assemblage very close to the Latvian Ketleri and Pavari localities (Lebedev 1995; Lebedev and Lukševics 1996). The Ala-Archa locality yielded the remains of an antiarch fish Remigolepis, which seems to play an important role in the structure of the Devonian tetrapod biota.
O.A. Lebedev. A new tetrapod from Russia 93 Continuation of the Table One of the problems of Palaeozoic biota reconstruction is determining whether fossil remains found in the oryctocoenosis are autochthonous or allochthonous. This is usually estimated by use of transportation traces on the skeletal elements, more precisely the degree of post mortem wear. If this wear is considerable, it almost certainly indicates long transportation and possible introduction of alien animal remains to the taphocoenosis. The most accurate approach towards this problem is to regard as autochthonous only articulated or at least semi-articulated skeletal parts. In Table I this regards only the East Greenland and Andreyevka localities. However disarticulated, the Red Hill remains were also regarded as autochthonous by Daeschler (2000). All the rest are formally regarded as allochtonous despite the possibility of long pebbling within the same basin and biotope which was the original dwelling place. This indeterminate
Page 1 and 2:
LATVIJAS UNIVERSITĀTES RAKSTI 679.
Page 3 and 4:
LATVIJAS UNIVERSITĀTES RAKSTI 679.
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Ervīns Lukševičs and Ģ
Page 7 and 8:
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS LATVIENSIS, 2004
Page 9 and 10:
Ervīns Lukševičs, Ģirts Stinkul
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Olga Afanassieva. Microrelief on th
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
D.K. Elliott, E. Mark-Kurik, E.B. D
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42: D.K. Elliott, E. Mark-Kurik, E.B. D
Page 47 and 48: C.G.Miller, T. Marss, H. Blom. New
Page 57 and 58: ACTA UNIVERSITATIS LATVIENSIS, 2004
Page 59 and 60: H.-P. Schultze, T. Marss. Revisitin
Page 81 and 82: O.A. Lebedev. A new tetrapod from R
Page 91: O.A. Lebedev. A new tetrapod from R
Page 101 and 102: E. Lukševičs, I. Zupiņš. Sedime
Page 121 and 122: J. Valiukevičius. Silurian acantho
Page 143 and 144:
J. Valiukevičius. Silurian acantho
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
V. Pernegre, V. Dupret. Biostratigr
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Ž. Žigaite. New telodont from Tuv
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
show all

Zemes un vides zinātnes Earth and Environment Sciences - Latvijas ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?