23.11.2013 Views

GOHMISSION GEOLOGIQVE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

GOHMISSION GEOLOGIQVE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

GOHMISSION GEOLOGIQVE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suomen Geologinen Seura. N:o 12. Qeologiska Sallskapet i Finland. 17<br />

a spectacular fashion. B is found some 50 m away from A (but there<br />

may be missing links below sealevel in between). The enclosing rock '<br />

is a kinaigite gneis giving evidence of strong deformation. But lacking<br />

the dark ~eins one would not perceive that it must have been kneaded<br />

as a chunck of iutty.<br />

In none of my specimens could 1 detect even indications of the<br />

structure shown in <strong>fi</strong>gure 3, D II. On the other hand several ceaes were<br />

found with the structure of 1 (<strong>fi</strong>g. 1; 2,A; and 5 B, and C), where the<br />

wall rock is intensively deformed close up to the vein, but much less<br />

at a very short distance away from it. In the latter case one could<br />

easily be deceived into believing that the wa11 rocks show no deformation.<br />

Often there must have been unconformity between the vein<br />

and its wall to begin with. Especially with an irregularly shaped intrusion<br />

it will be dif<strong>fi</strong>cult to ascertain whether our theoretical case II<br />

is actuaily represented. 1 admit that Suter's <strong>fi</strong>gure 39, although a<br />

))Schema)) does suggest primary sinuous injection. 1 wilI return to this<br />

case presently. On the other hand nobody can doubt that Milch's<br />

drawing is accurate in this respeot and here the theoretical case of<br />

<strong>fi</strong>g. 3, D 1 is beautifully shown (<strong>fi</strong>g. 5, A).<br />

The case shown in <strong>fi</strong>g. 3, E, that appears repeatedly in <strong>fi</strong>g. 5, C<br />

is also signi<strong>fi</strong>cant. It shows how a thin vein is deflected and given a<br />

twist by the contortions of a thicker vein. The original cross-over<br />

remaim at right angles to the less mobile thicker vein.<br />

5. Presumably Read believes the magma to have flowed not up<br />

along the strike of the folds, but across from one to another, but he<br />

does not say so. In any case the magrna would have to follow a long<br />

course, and a quantity would pass through each fold, yet the thin,<br />

sometimes almost cut off tongues of country-rock between the meanders<br />

have not been shifted out of place (<strong>fi</strong>g. 2, C).<br />

6. Fig. 1, C shows two veina separated by a thin screen. Straight<br />

screens are common and could be folded subsequently, but the direct<br />

formation without subsequent distortioIi is dif<strong>fi</strong>cult to irnagine.<br />

7. As Read already remarked: >>Time and again, veins have been<br />

observed that are perfectly plane ))lits>) when parallel to the bedding<br />

or foliation, but show marked tortuosity when they leave these controlling<br />

guideso - He believes that: ))The absence of easily opened<br />

plane channels for the injected materia1 thus affects the form of the<br />

veins)).<br />

In the direction of the ))controlling guideso plane <strong>fi</strong>ssures were<br />

evidently readily formed. But why should the vein then continually<br />

leave these easily formed <strong>fi</strong>ssures and force its way across the ~tough .<br />

directionv? Fig. 1, A gives a good example.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!