31.12.2013 Views

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. Solution of the ra<strong>di</strong>al Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation, Eq.(3.5), with the Lennard-<br />

Jones potential (3.9) for scatter<strong>in</strong>g states (i.e. with positive energy). One<br />

can simply use Numerov’s method with a uniform grid and outwards<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration only (there is no danger of numerical <strong>in</strong>stabilities, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

solution is oscillat<strong>in</strong>g). One has however to be careful and to avoid the<br />

<strong>di</strong>vergence (as ∼ r −12 ) for r → 0. A simple way to avoid runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

trouble is to start the <strong>in</strong>tegration not from r m<strong>in</strong> = 0 but from a small but<br />

nonzero value. A suitable value might be r m<strong>in</strong> ∼ 0.5σ, where the wave<br />

function is very small but not too close to zero. The first two po<strong>in</strong>ts can be<br />

calculated <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way, by assum<strong>in</strong>g the asymptotic (vanish<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

form for r → 0:<br />

χ ′′ (r) ≃ 2mɛ<br />

¯h 2 σ 12<br />

r 12 χ(r) =⇒ χ(r) ≃ exp ⎛<br />

⎝−<br />

√<br />

2mɛσ 12<br />

25¯h 2<br />

r−5 ⎞<br />

⎠ (3.15)<br />

(note that this procedure is not very accurate because it <strong>in</strong>troduces and<br />

error of lower order, i.e. worse, than that of the Numerov’s algorithm.<br />

In fact by assum<strong>in</strong>g such form for the first two steps of the recursion,<br />

we use a solution that is neither analytically exact, nor consistent with<br />

Numerov’s algorithm).<br />

The choice of the units <strong>in</strong> this code is (once aga<strong>in</strong>) <strong>di</strong>fferent from that of<br />

the previous codes. It is convenient to choose units <strong>in</strong> which ¯h 2 /2m is a<br />

number of the order of 1. Two possible choices are meV/Å 2 , or meV/σ 2 .<br />

This code uses the former choice. Note that m here is not the electron<br />

mass! it is the reduced mass of the H-Kr system. As a first approximation,<br />

m is here the mass of H.<br />

2. Calculation of the phase shifts δ l (E). Phase shifts can be calculated by<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g the calculated wave functions with the asymptotic solution at<br />

two <strong>di</strong>fferent values r 1 and r 2 , both larger than the <strong>di</strong>stance r max beyond<br />

which the potential can be considered to be negligible. Let us write<br />

χ l (r 1 ) = Akr 1 [j l (kr 1 ) cos δ l − n l (kr 1 ) s<strong>in</strong> δ l ] (3.16)<br />

χ l (r 2 ) = Akr 2 [j l (kr 2 ) cos δ l − n l (kr 2 ) s<strong>in</strong> δ l ] , (3.17)<br />

from which, by <strong>di</strong>vid<strong>in</strong>g the two relations, we obta<strong>in</strong> an auxiliary quantity<br />

K<br />

K ≡ r 2χ l (r 1 )<br />

r 1 χ l (r 2 ) = j l(kr 1 ) − n l (kr 1 ) tan δ l<br />

(3.18)<br />

j l (kr 2 ) − n l (kr 2 ) tan δ l<br />

from which we can deduce the phase shift:<br />

tan δ l = Kj l(kr 2 ) − j l (kr 1 )<br />

Kn l (kr 2 ) − n l (kr 1 ) . (3.19)<br />

The choice of r 1 and r 2 is not very critical. A good choice for r 1 is about<br />

at r max . S<strong>in</strong>ce the LJ potential decays quite quickly, a good choice is<br />

r 1 = r max = 5σ. For r 2 , the choice is r 2 = r 1 + λ/2, where λ = 1/k is the<br />

wave length of the scattered wave function.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!