31.12.2013 Views

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

Numerical Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Dipartimento di Fisica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where we have <strong>in</strong>troduced a ”Hartree potential” V H (it is not the same as <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Hartree equations!) and an ”exchange potential” V x . The Hartree potential is<br />

the same for all orbitals:<br />

V H (1) = ∑ j<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

φ ∗ j(2) q2 e<br />

φ j (2)dv 2 ≡<br />

r 12<br />

where we have <strong>in</strong>troduce the charge density<br />

ρ(2) q2 e<br />

r 12<br />

dv 2 , (7.14)<br />

ρ(2) = ∑ j<br />

φ ∗ j(2)φ j (2). (7.15)<br />

We can verify that ρ(1) is equal to the probability to f<strong>in</strong>d an electron <strong>in</strong> (1),<br />

that is,<br />

∫<br />

ρ(1) = N |Ψ(1, 2, .., N)| 2 dv 2 ...dv N . (7.16)<br />

The exchange term:<br />

( ˆV x φ k )(1) = − ∑ j<br />

∫<br />

δ(σ k , σ j )<br />

φ ∗ j(2) q2 e<br />

r 12<br />

φ k (2)φ j (1) dv 2 (7.17)<br />

does not have the simple form of the Hartree potential: V H (1)φ k (1), where<br />

V H (1) comes from an <strong>in</strong>tegration over variable 2. It has <strong>in</strong>stead a form like<br />

∫<br />

( ˆV x φ)(1) ≡ V x (1, 2)φ k (2)dv 2 (7.18)<br />

typical of a non local <strong>in</strong>teraction.<br />

7.1.2 Correlation energy<br />

The Hartree-Fock solution is not exact: it would be if the system under study<br />

were described by a wave function hav<strong>in</strong>g the form of a Slater determ<strong>in</strong>ant. This<br />

is <strong>in</strong> general not true. The energy <strong>di</strong>fference between the exact and Hartree-<br />

Fock solution is known as correlation energy. 1 The orig<strong>in</strong> of the name comes<br />

from the fact that the Hartree-Fock approximation misses part of the ”electron<br />

correlation”: the effects of an electron on all others. This is present <strong>in</strong> Hartree-<br />

Fock via the exchange and electrostatic <strong>in</strong>teractions; more subtle effects are not<br />

accounted for, because they require a more general form of the wave function.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, the probability P (r 1 , r 2 ) to f<strong>in</strong>d an electron at <strong>di</strong>stance r 1 and<br />

one as <strong>di</strong>stance r 2 from the orig<strong>in</strong> is not simply equal to p(r 1 )p(r 2 ), because<br />

electrons try to ”avoid” each other. The correlation energy <strong>in</strong> the case of He<br />

atom is about 0.084 Ry: a small quantity relative to the energy (∼ 1.5%), but<br />

not negligible.<br />

An obvious way to improve upon the Hartree-Fock results consists <strong>in</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contributions from other Slater determ<strong>in</strong>ants to the wave function. This is<br />

the essence of the “configuration <strong>in</strong>teraction” (CI) method. Its practical application<br />

requires a sophisticated ”technology” to choose among the enormous<br />

1 Feynman called it stupi<strong>di</strong>ty energy, because the only physical quantity that it measures is<br />

our <strong>in</strong>ability to f<strong>in</strong>d the exact solution!<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!