06.01.2014 Views

YOUTH LITTER SEGMENTATION RESEARCH

YOUTH LITTER SEGMENTATION RESEARCH

YOUTH LITTER SEGMENTATION RESEARCH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPINIONS OF CURRENT ANTI-<strong>LITTER</strong> SCHEMES<br />

- ‘NAME AND SHAME’-<br />

HEADTEACHERS NAMING AND SHAMING<br />

<strong>LITTER</strong>ING OFFENDERS<br />

• Opinions were very much polarised<br />

• Those who voted for it (a mix of all types) felt that the idea of being ‘named and shamed’ in<br />

assembly would be a real deterrent “You wouldn’t do it again if you were called out in<br />

assembly”; “Nobody would want the humiliation in front of the school”<br />

• Some suggested certain ‘improvements’<br />

– Total humiliation “Make them wear a dress, or a sign saying ‘litterbug’”<br />

– Only for repeat offenders “Can’t be just if you put stuff near a bin and it blew away and<br />

you didn’t chase it”<br />

– Total surprise “If they didn’t know they’d been seen and were suddenly called out in<br />

assembly then it may work better”<br />

• The only concern from those who feared the scheme was that some (harder) pupils would<br />

take it as a badge of honour “Some people might think it’s cool to get their name called out<br />

and to stand up”; “Some may think it funny or cool to be named”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!