- Page 1 and 2:
Syntactic Productivity: Extending A
- Page 3 and 4:
Overview 3 • Productivity • New
- Page 5 and 6:
Senses and Synonyms of “productiv
- Page 7 and 8:
Examples of Different Usages (2) 7
- Page 9 and 10:
Tomasello’s (2000) Usage 9 • Pr
- Page 11 and 12:
Making Sense of Different Senses of
- Page 13 and 14:
Measurements of productivity (1) 13
- Page 15 and 16:
Predicting productivity 15 8) The t
- Page 17 and 18:
“Two kinds of ‘creativity’”
- Page 19 and 20:
Types, tokens and patterns in morph
- Page 21 and 22:
Definition of syntactic productivit
- Page 23 and 24:
The inverse correlation between typ
- Page 25 and 26:
The productivity cline 25 Bergen J
- Page 27 and 28:
High type frequency vs. open schema
- Page 29 and 30:
Degrees of productivity 29 • Assu
- Page 31 and 32:
Modified version of C&C’s gradien
- Page 33 and 34:
strung vs. swept verbs 33 • It is
- Page 35 and 36:
Token frequency’s contribution to
- Page 37 and 38:
The inverse correlation between typ
- Page 39 and 40:
Summary (2) 39 • There two notion
- Page 41 and 42:
Case study 1: New verbs in Icelandi
- Page 43 and 44:
Type frequencies 43 • Nominative
- Page 45 and 46:
Corpus count 45 • Modern Icelandi
- Page 47 and 48:
Nom-Acc construction 47 • Basic e
- Page 49 and 50:
Nom-Dat construction 49 • Basic e
- Page 51 and 52:
Animate vs. inanimate reference of
- Page 53 and 54:
Nom-Gen 53 Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal
- Page 55 and 56:
Recent borrowings in Icelandic (1)
- Page 57 and 58: Recent borrowings in Icelandic (3)
- Page 59 and 60: Productivity is associated with rul
- Page 61 and 62: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
- Page 63 and 64: The productivity of Nom-Acc and Nom
- Page 65 and 66: Low-level verb-class generalization
- Page 67 and 68: The productivity of Nom-Acc and Nom
- Page 69 and 70: Two sides of the same coin 69 • O
- Page 71 and 72: Choice of model items for analogica
- Page 73 and 74: Inverse correlation between type an
- Page 75 and 76: Summary 75 • This case assignment
- Page 77 and 78: Five Screen Beans silhouettes 77 Be
- Page 79 and 80: Lexical and semantic priming 79 Ber
- Page 81 and 82: Statistics 81 The differences betwe
- Page 83 and 84: Results (2) 83 • This suggests th
- Page 85 and 86: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
- Page 87 and 88: Generative vs. usage-based construc
- Page 89 and 90: Case study 3: New Verbs of instrume
- Page 91 and 92: Why Icelandic? 91 • 86% of the Ic
- Page 93 and 94: Constructional Choices 93 (4) … f
- Page 95 and 96: The Questionnaire 95 • Ég (e)mei
- Page 97 and 98: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
- Page 99 and 100: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
- Page 101 and 102: Question 101 • Why is the Caused-
- Page 103 and 104: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
- Page 105 and 106: Proportion of motion verbs among No
- Page 107: Conclusion: Analogy vs. High type f