Syntactic Productivity

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Definitions of productivity 12 1. The probability of a word formation pattern accepted as the model for new/potential words (Aronoff 1983: 163, fn. 1). 2. The likelyhood that a pattern will apply to new forms (Bybee 1995: 430, Bybee and Thompson 1997: 384). 3. The interaction between the potential of a morphological process to generate repetitive non-creative forms and the degree to which it is utilized in language use to yield new lexical items (Bauer 2001: 211). Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 2008
Measurements of productivity (1) 13 1) The number of words a morphological process may apply to (Lieber 1981: 114-115). 2) The number of new words coined by a morphological process (during a specific period of time) (Anhsen and Aronoff 1989). 3) The proportion between actual items and potential items generated by a morphological process (Aronoff 1976: 36). 4) The low token frequency of items as compared to the higher mean token frequency of other items in a corpus (Aronoff 1983). Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 2008
Page 1 and 2: Syntactic Productivity: Extending A
Page 3 and 4: Overview 3 • Productivity • New
Page 5 and 6: Senses and Synonyms of “productiv
Page 7 and 8: Examples of Different Usages (2) 7
Page 9 and 10: Tomasello’s (2000) Usage 9 • Pr
Page 11: Making Sense of Different Senses of
Page 15 and 16: Predicting productivity 15 8) The t
Page 17 and 18: “Two kinds of ‘creativity’”
Page 19 and 20: Types, tokens and patterns in morph
Page 21 and 22: Definition of syntactic productivit
Page 23 and 24: The inverse correlation between typ
Page 25 and 26: The productivity cline 25 Bergen J
Page 27 and 28: High type frequency vs. open schema
Page 29 and 30: Degrees of productivity 29 • Assu
Page 31 and 32: Modified version of C&C’s gradien
Page 33 and 34: strung vs. swept verbs 33 • It is
Page 35 and 36: Token frequency’s contribution to
Page 37 and 38: The inverse correlation between typ
Page 39 and 40: Summary (2) 39 • There two notion
Page 41 and 42: Case study 1: New verbs in Icelandi
Page 43 and 44: Type frequencies 43 • Nominative
Page 45 and 46: Corpus count 45 • Modern Icelandi
Page 47 and 48: Nom-Acc construction 47 • Basic e
Page 49 and 50: Nom-Dat construction 49 • Basic e
Page 51 and 52: Animate vs. inanimate reference of
Page 53 and 54: Nom-Gen 53 Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal
Page 55 and 56: Recent borrowings in Icelandic (1)
Page 57 and 58: Recent borrowings in Icelandic (3)
Page 59 and 60: Productivity is associated with rul
Page 61 and 62: Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
Page 63 and 64:
The productivity of Nom-Acc and Nom
Page 65 and 66:
Low-level verb-class generalization
Page 67 and 68:
The productivity of Nom-Acc and Nom
Page 69 and 70:
Two sides of the same coin 69 • O
Page 71 and 72:
Choice of model items for analogica
Page 73 and 74:
Inverse correlation between type an
Page 75 and 76:
Summary 75 • This case assignment
Page 77 and 78:
Five Screen Beans silhouettes 77 Be
Page 79 and 80:
Lexical and semantic priming 79 Ber
Page 81 and 82:
Statistics 81 The differences betwe
Page 83 and 84:
Results (2) 83 • This suggests th
Page 85 and 86:
Bergen Jóhanna Barðdal June 5, 20
Page 87 and 88:
Generative vs. usage-based construc
Page 89 and 90:
Case study 3: New Verbs of instrume
Page 91 and 92:
Why Icelandic? 91 • 86% of the Ic
Page 93 and 94:
Constructional Choices 93 (4) … f
Page 95 and 96:
The Questionnaire 95 • Ég (e)mei
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Question 101 • Why is the Caused-
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Proportion of motion verbs among No
Page 107 and 108:
Conclusion: Analogy vs. High type f
Page 109 and 110:
Summary 109 • All three new verbs
show all

Syntactic Productivity

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?