24.01.2014 Views

CDC Article-US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010

CDC Article-US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010

CDC Article-US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 MMWR June 18, <strong>2010</strong><br />

TABLE. (Continued) Classifications <strong>for</strong> progestin-only contraceptives,* † including progestin-only pills, DMPA, and implants<br />

Category<br />

Condition<br />

POP DMPA Implants<br />

Clarifications/Evidence/Comments<br />

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)<br />

a. Past PID (assuming no current<br />

risk factors <strong>for</strong> STIs)<br />

i. With subsequent pregnancy 1 1 1<br />

ii. Without subsequent<br />

1 1 1<br />

pregnancy<br />

b. Current PID 1 1 1<br />

Comment: Whether POCs, like COCs, reduce the risk <strong>for</strong><br />

PID among women with STIs is unknown, but they do not<br />

protect against HIV or lower genital tract STI.<br />

STIs<br />

a. Current purulent cervicitis or<br />

1 1 1<br />

chlamydial infection or gonorrhea<br />

b. Other STIs (excluding HIV and<br />

1 1 1<br />

hepatitis)<br />

c. Vaginitis (including Trichomonas<br />

1 1 1<br />

vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis)<br />

d. Increased risk <strong>for</strong> STIs 1 1 1 Evidence: Evidence suggests a possible increased risk<br />

<strong>for</strong> chlamydial cervicitis among DMPA users at high risk <strong>for</strong><br />

STIs. For other STIs, either evidence exists of no association<br />

between DMPA use and STI acquisition or evidence is<br />

too limited to draw any conclusions. No evidence is available<br />

about other POCs (151–158)<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

High risk <strong>for</strong> HIV 1 1 1 Evidence: The balance of the evidence suggests no association<br />

between POC use and HIV acquisition, although<br />

findings from studies of DMPA use conducted among higher<br />

risk populations have been inconsistent (159–183).<br />

HIV infection § 1 1 1 Evidence: Most studies suggest no increased risk <strong>for</strong> HIV<br />

disease progression with hormonal contraceptive use,<br />

as measured by changes in CD4 cell count, viral load, or<br />

survival. Studies observing that women with HIV who use<br />

hormonal contraception have increased risks <strong>for</strong> STIs are<br />

generally consistent with reports among uninfected women.<br />

One direct study found no association between hormonal<br />

contraceptive use and increased risk <strong>for</strong> HIV transmission to<br />

uninfected partners; several indirect studies reported mixed<br />

results about whether hormonal contraception is associated<br />

with increased risk <strong>for</strong> HIV-1 DNA or RNA shedding from the<br />

genital tract (171,184–200).<br />

AIDS § 1 1 1 Clarification: Drug interactions might exist between<br />

hormonal contraceptives and ARV drugs; refer to the<br />

section on drug interactions.<br />

Other Infections<br />

Schistosomiasis<br />

a. Uncomplicated 1 1 1 Evidence: Among women with uncomplicated schistosomiasis,<br />

limited evidence showed that DMPA use had no<br />

adverse effects on liver function (201).<br />

b. Fibrosis of liver§<br />

(if severe, see cirrhosis)<br />

1 1 1<br />

Tuberculosis §<br />

a. Nonpelvic 1 1 1<br />

b. Pelvic 1 1 1<br />

Clarification: If a woman is taking rifampicin, refer to the<br />

section on drug interactions. Rifampicin is likely to decrease<br />

the effectiveness of some POCs.<br />

Malaria 1 1 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!