28.01.2014 Views

US-Listed ETFs Sorted by Asset Class and Year-to-Date Return

US-Listed ETFs Sorted by Asset Class and Year-to-Date Return

US-Listed ETFs Sorted by Asset Class and Year-to-Date Return

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Issue No. 128<br />

July 2011<br />

www.indexuniverse.com/ETFR<br />

GSG Tracking: What<br />

Really Happened<br />

By Sumit Roy <strong>and</strong> Matt Hougan<br />

When it comes <strong>to</strong> commodity indexes,<br />

the S&P GSCI is far <strong>and</strong> away the<br />

leader. More than $100 billion in assets<br />

is tied <strong>to</strong> this index, including nearly<br />

$2 billion split between two popular<br />

exchange-traded products: the $1.7<br />

billion iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-<br />

Indexed Trust (NYSE Arca: GSG) <strong>and</strong><br />

its smaller cousin, the $121 million iPath<br />

S&P GSCI Total <strong>Return</strong> Index ETN<br />

(NYSE Arca: GSP).<br />

The two products aim <strong>to</strong> do the<br />

exact same thing: provide inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

with exposure <strong>to</strong> the S&P GSCI Total<br />

<strong>Return</strong> Index. Compare recent returns,<br />

however, <strong>and</strong> you get two very different<br />

pictures: As of June 6, GSG had<br />

returned 3.95 percent year-<strong>to</strong>-date,<br />

while GSP had returned 6.03 percent.<br />

Considering that the actual S&P GSCI<br />

benchmark is up 6.13 percent, GSG has<br />

underperformed expectations.<br />

UPDATES<br />

Do inves<strong>to</strong>rs have this wrong? Is the<br />

$1.7 billion in GSG tracking an inferior<br />

product? Should they swap out for GSP<br />

immediately?<br />

Not necessarily—the s<strong>to</strong>ry is more<br />

complex than it looks.<br />

Two Approaches To<br />

Tracking The Index<br />

While GSP <strong>and</strong> GSG aim <strong>to</strong> track the same<br />

index, they do so in different ways that<br />

promise two different kinds of results.<br />

As an ETN, GSP eliminates tracking<br />

error. ETNs are structured as debt<br />

notes, where<strong>by</strong> the underwriting<br />

bank—in this case, Barclays Capital—<br />

guarantees <strong>to</strong> deliver the exact return<br />

of the benchmark index. Barring unusual<br />

events, ETNs will track nearly<br />

perfectly <strong>to</strong> their indexes, <strong>and</strong> GSP has<br />

delivered on this promise.<br />

There is no such thing as a free<br />

lunch, of course, <strong>and</strong> the per-<br />

Russell Launches First In-House <strong>ETFs</strong><br />

12<br />

IN THIS ISSUE<br />

iShares’ GSG suddenly <strong>and</strong> inexplicably<br />

underperformed its benchmark, even<br />

as its ETN competition excelled. What<br />

happened, <strong>and</strong> will the ETF correct?<br />

Page 1<br />

At the height of the silver bubble, the<br />

CME increased margin requirements on<br />

futures contracts six times. Did the CME<br />

pop the bubble?<br />

Page 6<br />

Ben Tobias, president of Tobias<br />

Financial, shares why VIG is his favorite<br />

ETF for dividends, <strong>and</strong> why income is so<br />

important for his clients.<br />

Page 8<br />

Float adjustment is one of the oldest<br />

controversies in index investments. Learn<br />

how each index provider calculates<br />

float—<strong>and</strong> how your <strong>ETFs</strong> are affected.<br />

Page 9<br />

ETFR’s monthly data bank covers all U.S.-<br />

listed <strong>ETFs</strong>, including assets, performance<br />

data <strong>and</strong> more.<br />

Pages 15-22<br />

News Highlights: Russell Finally<br />

Launches <strong>ETFs</strong>; Guggenheim Unveils<br />

Active Bond <strong>ETFs</strong>; iShares’ Parsons Joins<br />

VelocityShares; Global X <strong>ETFs</strong> Trade Free<br />

On Interactive … And much more!<br />

Pages 1-4<br />

In mid-May, Russell Investments launched<br />

six exchange-traded funds, its first after<br />

a protracted regula<strong>to</strong>ry process that has<br />

left it a latecomer <strong>to</strong> the now-crowded<br />

field of ETF sponsors.<br />

The new funds, called the “Russell Investment<br />

Discipline <strong>ETFs</strong>,” are based on what<br />

the firm called the most prevalent strategies<br />

professional investment managers use<br />

when selecting individual securities. They<br />

are all priced at 0.37 percent <strong>and</strong> include:<br />

• Russell Aggressive Growth ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: AGRG)<br />

• Russell Consistent Growth ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: CONG)<br />

• Russell Growth at a Reasonable Price ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: GRPC)<br />

• Russell Equity Income ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: EQIN)<br />

• Russell Low P/E ETF (NYSE Arca: LWP)<br />

• Russell Contrarian ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: CNTR)<br />

Russell had been trying <strong>to</strong> obtain<br />

permission from the Securities <strong>and</strong> Exchange<br />

Commission <strong>to</strong> market its own<br />

line of active <strong>and</strong> passive <strong>ETFs</strong> for about<br />

two years. The process usually takes anywhere<br />

from six <strong>to</strong> nine months, though<br />

sources at Russell disputed the notion<br />

that its so-called exemptive relief petitions<br />

at the SEC were somehow being<br />

held up. Industry sources have said the<br />

delays for Russell were related <strong>to</strong> 3


InsideIndexing<br />

inaugural<br />

conference<br />

BUIlDIng Better BetA 2011<br />

InsideCommodities<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong>Europe<br />

InsideIndexing InsideCommodities<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong>Europe InsideIndexing For more InFormAtIon:<br />

www.InsideIndexingConference.com /etFr<br />

From the producers of:<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong><br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong>Europe<br />

InsideCommodities<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 17-18, 2011<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong><br />

the ritz-carl<strong>to</strong>n • philadelphia, pa<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong><br />

Designed specifically for InstItutIonal Inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Featured speakers:<br />

InsideIndexing<br />

Inside<strong>ETFs</strong>Europe<br />

John C. Bogle<br />

Founder of The Vanguard Group, Inc.,<br />

President, Vanguard’s Bogle Financial<br />

Markets Research Center<br />

george Inside<strong>ETFs</strong><br />

F. Will<br />

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Columnist,<br />

Journalist & Author<br />

} For speaking opportunities, please contact:<br />

Allison Jones at 415-659-9012 or ajones@IndexUniverse.com<br />

Presented <strong>by</strong>:<br />

} For sponsorship opportunities, please contact:<br />

Don Friedman at 415-659-9009 or dfriedman@IndexUniverse.com


UPDATES<br />

Index Publications LLC<br />

353 Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Street, Suite 1520<br />

San Francisco, CA 94111<br />

Publisher<br />

Jim Wi<strong>and</strong>t<br />

415 659 9007<br />

Fax 415 659 9005<br />

jwi<strong>and</strong>t@indexuniverse.com<br />

Edi<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Matt Hougan<br />

mhougan@indexuniverse.com<br />

Managing Edi<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Cory Banks<br />

cbanks@indexuniverse.com<br />

Copy Edi<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Lisa Barr<br />

lbarr@indexuniverse.com<br />

Art Direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Jeannine Gaubert Pamoukdjian<br />

jpamoukdjian@indexuniverse.com<br />

Online Production Manager<br />

Juan Calderon<br />

jcaldero@indexuniverse.com<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Advertising<br />

Don Friedman<br />

415 659 9009<br />

dfriedman@indexuniverse.com<br />

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION<br />

The introduc<strong>to</strong>ry rate <strong>to</strong> subscribe <strong>to</strong> ETFR<br />

is $279 annually. Subscribe <strong>by</strong> contacting<br />

Steve Kimball at<br />

skimball@fa-mag.com or <strong>by</strong> calling<br />

732.450.8866, ext. 12.<br />

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT<br />

© 2011 Index Publications LLC. All rights reserved.<br />

The text, images <strong>and</strong> other materials contained or displayed<br />

are proprietary <strong>to</strong> Index Publications LLC, except where otherwise<br />

noted, <strong>and</strong> constitute valuable intellectual property.<br />

No material from any part of any Index Publications LLC publication,<br />

product, service, report, e-mail or Web site may be<br />

downloaded, transmitted, broadcast, transferred, assigned,<br />

reproduced or in any other way used or otherwise disseminated<br />

in any form <strong>to</strong> any person or entity, without the explicit<br />

written consent of Index Publications LLC.<br />

For permission <strong>to</strong> pho<strong>to</strong>copy <strong>and</strong> use material electronically,<br />

please contact reprints@indexuniverse.com or call<br />

415-659-9004.<br />

the SEC not being comfortable granting<br />

exemptive relief <strong>to</strong> a firm that already<br />

has such a large presence in the<br />

world of indexing.<br />

At the end of May, Russell followed up<br />

the initial launch with the rollout of 10<br />

more <strong>ETFs</strong> tracking “fac<strong>to</strong>r-based” versions<br />

of the Russell 1000 <strong>and</strong> Russell 2000.<br />

Guggenheim Unveils<br />

Active Bond <strong>ETFs</strong><br />

Guggenheim Funds entered the actively<br />

managed ETF space in May with the<br />

launch of two bond funds that target<br />

core exposure as well as an inves<strong>to</strong>r’s<br />

need for income.<br />

The Guggenheim Enhanced Core<br />

Bond ETF (NYSE Arca: GIY) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Guggenheim Enhanced Ultra-Short<br />

Bond ETF (NYSE Arca: GSY) are currently<br />

the cheapest actively managed<br />

fixed-income <strong>ETFs</strong> available.<br />

GIY aims <strong>to</strong> outperform the Barclays<br />

Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index using<br />

a quantitative strategy that seeks <strong>to</strong><br />

both identify mispriced bonds <strong>and</strong> estimate<br />

future returns linked <strong>to</strong> a correction<br />

in those mispricings.<br />

Guggenheim’s other offering, GSY,<br />

focuses on the short end of the yield<br />

curve <strong>and</strong> seeks <strong>to</strong> outperform the one<strong>to</strong><br />

three-month Treasury Bill Index.<br />

The fund seeks “maximum income”<br />

<strong>and</strong> invests primarily in dollar-denominated<br />

investment-grade government<br />

<strong>and</strong> corporate bonds, but it may include<br />

some foreign debt as well.<br />

The two new Guggenheim <strong>ETFs</strong> have<br />

annual expense ratios of 0.27 percent.<br />

VelocityShares Adds<br />

iShares’ Parsons To Board<br />

VelocityShares, the new ETN company<br />

known for its volatility-linked products,<br />

in May named <strong>to</strong> its board J. Parsons,<br />

who was previously global head of<br />

iShares sales while it was part of Barclays<br />

Global Inves<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

VelocityShares first entered the ETP<br />

market with the launch of six VIX-based<br />

ETNs in November 2010, among them<br />

the VelocityShares Daily 2X VIX Short-<br />

Term ETN (NYSE Arca: TVIX). The company<br />

said its family of ETNs has since<br />

amassed about $180 million in assets.<br />

Parsons, who led iShares’ global<br />

business development from its inception<br />

through its sale <strong>to</strong> BlackRock, said<br />

he is “thrilled” <strong>to</strong> help the company<br />

continue <strong>to</strong> grow.<br />

VelocityShares’ lineup of VIX-linked<br />

ETNs includes leveraged as well as inverse<br />

strategies. It said TVIX now trades<br />

more than 1 million shares a day, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

one of the most liquid ETPs launched in<br />

the last six months.<br />

Parsons left BlackRock in 2010.<br />

Global X ETF Trades<br />

Free On Interactive<br />

Interactive Brokers began offering free<br />

trades on <strong>ETFs</strong> sponsored <strong>by</strong> New Yorkbased<br />

Global X in May. Terms of the<br />

agreement weren’t disclosed.<br />

The free-trading offer is the latest<br />

sign of competition in the rapidly growing<br />

world of <strong>ETFs</strong>. The most conspicuous<br />

price battle is between Vanguard, the<br />

No. 3 U.S. ETF firm, <strong>and</strong> discount broker<br />

Schwab, with both firms offering free<br />

trades <strong>to</strong> clients trading their respective<br />

proprietary <strong>ETFs</strong>. Additionally, Scottrade<br />

is offering free trades on a new lineup of<br />

15 equity funds it rolled out in March.<br />

Interactive Brokers <strong>and</strong> its affiliates<br />

execute almost 1 million trades per<br />

day on a variety of electronic products,<br />

among them s<strong>to</strong>cks, options, futures,<br />

foreign exchange <strong>and</strong> bonds, according<br />

<strong>to</strong> the company’s website. The company’s<br />

mission is <strong>to</strong> create technology <strong>and</strong><br />

provide liquidity on better terms.<br />

Global X has gathered almost $1.7<br />

billion in assets spread among well over<br />

30 funds; it rolled out its first ETF in<br />

February 2009.<br />

First Trust Rolls Out<br />

First-Ever Au<strong>to</strong> ETF<br />

In May, First Trust rolled out the world’s<br />

first ETF focused on au<strong>to</strong>mobile manufacturers,<br />

in part as a reflection of high<br />

hopes in the investment world that the<br />

emerging markets will power global<br />

growth in the coming years.<br />

The First Trust Nasdaq Global Au<strong>to</strong><br />

Index Fund (NasdaqGM: CARZ) is based<br />

on the Nasdaq OMX Global Au<strong>to</strong> Index,<br />

a benchmark designed <strong>to</strong> track the performance<br />

of the biggest <strong>and</strong> most liquid<br />

companies engaged in the au<strong>to</strong> manufacturing<br />

industry. The ETF has an an-<br />

ETFR • July 2011 3


UPDATES<br />

nual expense ratio of 0.70 percent.<br />

The biggest country holding in the ETF<br />

at launch was Japan, at almost a third of<br />

the portfolio, followed <strong>by</strong> Germany, at just<br />

over 20 percent <strong>and</strong> the U.S., at almost 18<br />

percent. South Korean companies make<br />

up about 10 percent of the ETF.<br />

The <strong>to</strong>p three companies in the fund<br />

are Germany’s Daimler AG, at 8.28 percent;<br />

General Mo<strong>to</strong>rs at 7.64 percent;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Honda at 5.67 percent.<br />

Direxion Changes<br />

Tickers On Natgas Funds<br />

Direxion changed the ticker symbols on<br />

a pair of its natural gas funds in May.<br />

The Direxion Daily Natural Gas Related<br />

Bull 2x Shares will now trade under the<br />

ticker GASL <strong>and</strong> the Direxion Daily Natural<br />

Gas Related Bear 2x Shares under the<br />

ticker GASX. The funds’ previous tickers<br />

were FCGL <strong>and</strong> FCGS, respectively. Both<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong> trade on the NYSE Arca exchange.<br />

The new tickers are motivated simply<br />

<strong>by</strong> the company’s desire <strong>to</strong> make its<br />

monikers more easily recognizable <strong>to</strong><br />

inves<strong>to</strong>rs seeking <strong>to</strong> take advantage of<br />

short-term market movement, a company<br />

spokesperson said.<br />

The pair of funds is designed <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

twice the daily or inverse performance<br />

of the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index,<br />

<strong>and</strong> has been around since August<br />

2010. The previous tickers bore clear resemblance<br />

<strong>to</strong> the trading symbol of the<br />

popular First Trust ISE-Revere Natural<br />

Gas ETF (NYSE Arca: FCG).<br />

Global X Debuts<br />

Fertilizer, Farming <strong>ETFs</strong><br />

In May, Global X Funds launched two<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong>, focusing on global fertilizer producers<br />

<strong>and</strong> farming equities.<br />

The Global X Fertilizers/Potash ETF<br />

(NYSE Arca: SOIL), <strong>by</strong> tracking the<br />

Solactive Global Fertilizers/Potash Index,<br />

owns the largest <strong>and</strong> most liquid global<br />

names involved in various aspects of the<br />

fertilizer industry. SOIL comes with a<br />

0.69 percent price tag.<br />

The Global X Farming ETF (NYSE Arca:<br />

BARN), on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is likely <strong>to</strong><br />

face stiff competition from the likes of<br />

the $5.25 billion Market Vec<strong>to</strong>rs Agribusiness<br />

ETF (NYSE Arca: MOO). Still, BARN<br />

claims <strong>to</strong> be more narrowly focused than<br />

its competi<strong>to</strong>rs, as it only includes companies<br />

in the agricultural products, lives<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

operations <strong>and</strong> farming equipment<br />

manufacturing segments.<br />

BARN tracks the Solactive Global<br />

Farming Index from Germany-based<br />

Structured Solutions AG. The benchmark<br />

comprises 50 securities screens for liquidity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> weights securities based on freefloat<br />

market capitalization.<br />

Retail Inves<strong>to</strong>rs Power<br />

Schwab ETF Gains<br />

Charles Schwab managed $121 billion in<br />

ETF assets at the end of the first quarter, 32<br />

percent more than a year ago, according <strong>to</strong><br />

the company’s latest ETF inves<strong>to</strong>r data. The<br />

increase is due largely <strong>to</strong> retail inves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong><br />

a generally growing appetite for <strong>ETFs</strong>.<br />

Retail inves<strong>to</strong>r assets in the various<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong> offered through Schwab’s platform<br />

soared 58 percent between March 2010<br />

<strong>and</strong> March 2011, <strong>and</strong> now represent 37<br />

percent of Schwab’s <strong>to</strong>tal ETF pie, up<br />

from 31 percent a year earlier. Similarly,<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> from clients using registered<br />

investment advisors grew 18 percent,<br />

though an exodus from international equity<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong> slowed the RIA-related growth,<br />

the company said.<br />

For Schwab, about 85 percent of<br />

advisors already include <strong>ETFs</strong> in their<br />

portfolios, while only a small portion of<br />

retail inves<strong>to</strong>rs do, Beth Flynn, Schwab’s<br />

vice president of ETF platform development,<br />

said in a telephone interview in<br />

May. But usage <strong>by</strong> these retail inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

is growing faster, she noted.<br />

While a retail inves<strong>to</strong>r who uses <strong>ETFs</strong><br />

had, on average, a 16 percent allocation<br />

<strong>to</strong> cash, a non-ETF retail inves<strong>to</strong>r tied<br />

nearly 40 percent of invested assets <strong>to</strong><br />

cash, Schwab data showed.<br />

IndexIQ Rolls Out<br />

Japan MidCap ETF<br />

In June, IndexIQ rolled out a first-of-itskind<br />

ETF focused on midcap Japanese<br />

companies that the firm says have growth<br />

characteristics of small-cap enterprises<br />

with the size <strong>and</strong> stability of larger ones.<br />

The IQ Japan Mid Cap ETF (NYSE Arca:<br />

RSUN) is designed <strong>to</strong> give inves<strong>to</strong>rs pureplay<br />

exposure <strong>to</strong> the midcap universe either<br />

as a st<strong>and</strong>-alone fund or in conjunction<br />

with small- <strong>and</strong> large-cap Japanese<br />

offerings <strong>to</strong> create broader-based exposure,<br />

the company said in a press release.<br />

As of May 16, the industrial sec<strong>to</strong>r made<br />

up 23.2 percent of the ETF’s underlying<br />

index, while the financial <strong>and</strong> technology<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs made up 17.7 percent <strong>and</strong> about 9<br />

percent, respectively, IndexIQ said.<br />

The new ETF has an annual expense<br />

ratio 0.69 percent.<br />

UBS Launches 2X<br />

Business Development ETN<br />

In late May, Swiss bank UBS launched a double-exposure<br />

exchange-traded note focused<br />

on business development companies.<br />

The UBS 2X Leveraged Long Wells<br />

Fargo Business Development Company<br />

ETN (NYSE Arca: BDCL) is essentially<br />

a double-exposure play on an ETN it<br />

launched on April 28 with the ticker<br />

(NYSE Arca: BDCS).<br />

Both ETNs are based on the market-capitalization-weighted<br />

Wells Fargo Business<br />

Development Company Index, <strong>and</strong> have<br />

annual expense ratios of 0.85 percent.<br />

The new ETNs reflect a growing interest<br />

in financing for smaller companies<br />

that some say goes h<strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> with<br />

an economy that’s starting <strong>to</strong> grow on its<br />

own, aside from government aid. While<br />

credit markets have normalized <strong>to</strong> a large<br />

extent, small companies are still having<br />

problems obtaining loans since the economic<br />

crisis of 2008.<br />

Deutsche Debuts Leveraged<br />

Dollar Index ETNs<br />

Deutsche Bank <strong>and</strong> Invesco PowerShares<br />

rolled out in late May the first-ever U.S.<br />

dollar index leveraged ETNs that provide<br />

triple-long <strong>and</strong> triple-short exposure<br />

<strong>to</strong> futures contracts on the currency<br />

benchmark that measures the value of<br />

the greenback compared with six of the<br />

world’s most-traded currencies.<br />

The Powershares DB 3x Long <strong>US</strong> Dollar<br />

Index Futures ETN (NYSE Arca: UUPT)<br />

<strong>and</strong> PowerShares DB 3x Short <strong>US</strong> Dollar<br />

Index Futures ETN each charge an annual<br />

expense ratio of 0.95 percent.<br />

They are designed <strong>to</strong> replicate the performance<br />

of the dollar relative <strong>to</strong> a basket<br />

of six currencies: the euro, Japanese yen,<br />

British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish<br />

krona <strong>and</strong> Swiss franc.<br />

The ETNs are rebalanced monthly. <br />

4 ETFR • July 2011


DBA<br />

T H E P O W E R S H A R E S D B<br />

AGRICULTURE FUND<br />

To download a copy of a prospectus, visit PowerShares.com/DBApro<br />

The fund is not a mutual fund or any other type of Investment Company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act<br />

of 1940 <strong>and</strong> is not subject <strong>to</strong> its regulation.<br />

DB Commodity Services LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, is the managing owner of the fund. Certain marketing<br />

services may be provided <strong>to</strong> the fund <strong>by</strong> Invesco Distribu<strong>to</strong>rs, Inc. or its affiliate, Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC<br />

(<strong>to</strong>gether, “Invesco”). Invesco will be compensated <strong>by</strong> Deutsche Bank or its affiliates. ALPS Distribu<strong>to</strong>rs, Inc. is the distribu<strong>to</strong>r of the<br />

fund. Invesco, Deutsche Bank <strong>and</strong> ALPS Distribu<strong>to</strong>rs, Inc. are not affiliated.<br />

Commodity futures contracts generally are volatile <strong>and</strong> are not suitable for all inves<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

An inves<strong>to</strong>r may lose all or substantially all of an investment in the fund.


Hidden In The Margins: Can<br />

CME Drive Commodities Prices?<br />

By Cory Banks<br />

Between March 25 <strong>and</strong> May 9—the<br />

height of the silver bubble—the Chicago<br />

Mercantile Exchange increased required<br />

margins on silver commodities futures<br />

trades six times. Each change adjusted<br />

the amount of margin inves<strong>to</strong>rs needed<br />

<strong>to</strong> put up for futures contracts through<br />

the world’s largest commodities exchange,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sent chills down the spines<br />

of dyed-in-the-wool futures traders.<br />

The CME stated in vague press release<br />

language that margin increases<br />

were due <strong>to</strong> rising volatility. Some serious<br />

futures traders question that, however,<br />

concerned over the lack of transparency<br />

behind what amounts <strong>to</strong> more<br />

required buy-in. Meanwhile, ETF inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

were left scratching their heads. Is<br />

it really possible that the exchange was<br />

trying <strong>to</strong> manipulate the market?<br />

The CME’s Safety Valves<br />

Margins are the safety valves set for every<br />

contract traded on the CME—the<br />

amount of collateral inves<strong>to</strong>rs must put<br />

up <strong>to</strong> purchase a futures contract in any<br />

of the products traded on the exchange.<br />

Instead of paying all $100,000 of a contract<br />

for wheat delivery in August, a<br />

futures trader can post the minimum<br />

amount required.<br />

Here’s how it works: Suppose Bob the<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>r buys a 12-month contract for<br />

cot<strong>to</strong>n for $100, using $20 of his own<br />

money, <strong>and</strong> $80 borrowed from his broker.<br />

The net value (share minus loan) is<br />

$20. The broker wants a minimum margin<br />

requirement of $10, which means<br />

that the net value of the loan must remain<br />

above $10.<br />

The next day, the price of cot<strong>to</strong>n<br />

goes down <strong>to</strong> $85. The net value of the<br />

contract is now only $5. Bob has hit the<br />

margin requirement: He will either have<br />

<strong>to</strong> sell the contract or put up more margin<br />

(i.e., repay part of the $80 loan) so<br />

that the net value of his position is again<br />

above $10. Add in quite a few zeroes<br />

<strong>and</strong> you’ve got the situation for millions<br />

of traders <strong>and</strong> billions of dollars a day.<br />

Each type of commodity traded<br />

through the CME’s system has an assigned<br />

set of margins. The initial<br />

amount of collateral you’d pay <strong>to</strong> trade<br />

oil is different from sugar or cot<strong>to</strong>n. According<br />

<strong>to</strong> the CME, the amount of collateral<br />

required depends on the volatility<br />

of the chosen commodity, as well as<br />

a variety of other fac<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

I think there is<br />

some truth that<br />

the specula<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

in funds <strong>and</strong> new<br />

products are driving<br />

a lot of volume<br />

that was never<br />

here before.<br />

—Kevin Kerr<br />

“The largest piece of data we’re looking<br />

at is his<strong>to</strong>rical volatility,” said Amy<br />

McCormick of the CME clearing group.<br />

This includes tracking the price for each<br />

product every day <strong>and</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>ring the<br />

changes. For many commodities, Mc-<br />

Cormick says volatility is the biggest<br />

component of the equation.<br />

What the rest of that equation is, however,<br />

remains a well-guarded secret.<br />

Smoke And Mirrors?<br />

Because CME keeps its calculations<br />

behind a veil, many traders are convinced<br />

that some sort of conspiracy<br />

exists between the exchanges <strong>and</strong> the<br />

commodities offered. The s<strong>to</strong>ries range<br />

from mere coincidence (the CME raised<br />

margins <strong>to</strong> make a profit as the bubble<br />

grew) <strong>to</strong> full-blown conspiracy theories<br />

(the CME is working in an interagency<br />

conspiracy <strong>to</strong> control the price of silver).<br />

The latter is fueled <strong>by</strong> memories of how<br />

a margin call ruined the Hunt brothers’<br />

attempts <strong>to</strong> corner the silver market in<br />

1980. With little hard information available,<br />

the chatter between traders ranges<br />

from speculative <strong>to</strong> spooked.<br />

Even experienced inves<strong>to</strong>rs are cautious.<br />

“Eight increases so far in one year—<br />

it sends the wrong signal, let’s put it that<br />

way,” said Kevin Kerr of Kerr Trading, an<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>r with 20 years of futures trading<br />

experience. “When any of these margins<br />

increase, we’re talking about significant<br />

amounts of money. People have <strong>to</strong> liquidate,<br />

<strong>and</strong> traders see the liquidation.”<br />

With “increased volatility” the only official<br />

reason given for the changes, the<br />

opportunity for whispered rumormongering<br />

increases. One of the biggest rumors<br />

is that the CME, due <strong>to</strong> increased pressure<br />

from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading<br />

Commission (CFTC) <strong>and</strong> members of<br />

Congress, is trying <strong>to</strong> flush out specula<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

from fragile commodities markets. Many<br />

point <strong>to</strong> this scenario in gasoline—in early<br />

May, CME increased margins on the fuel<br />

<strong>by</strong> 48 percent, <strong>and</strong> shortly afterward,<br />

gasoline prices dropped significantly. The<br />

rapid change in the market, according <strong>to</strong><br />

some, comes from the CME pricing out<br />

speculative traders.<br />

“I think there is some truth that the<br />

specula<strong>to</strong>rs in funds <strong>and</strong> new products<br />

are driving a lot of volume that was never<br />

here before,” said Kerr. But he also underst<strong>and</strong>s<br />

the exchange’s position, <strong>to</strong> a<br />

point. “I think CME is saying, ‘Yes, we’re<br />

raising the margins, because we want <strong>to</strong><br />

protect those people. We want <strong>to</strong> protect<br />

the integrity of the exchange.’”<br />

“We’re not trying <strong>to</strong> send the market<br />

any messages with our chang- 13<br />

6 ETFR • July 2011


YOU CAN’T FORCE A ROUND INVESTMENT<br />

INTO A SQUARE STRATEGY.<br />

Some people think it takes dog years <strong>to</strong><br />

find an investment that fits their strategy.<br />

So they wind up settling for whatever is<br />

“close enough.”<br />

At State Street, we believe precision is an<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>r’s best friend. With over 100 SPDR ®<br />

Exchange Traded Funds, we’re sure <strong>to</strong> have<br />

an investment that precisely matches your<br />

investment strategy.<br />

Interested in Emerging Markets? Fixed<br />

Income? Dividends? Whatever the market<br />

segment, you’ll get exactly what’s on the<br />

label. Nothing more. Nothing less.<br />

If you’re tired of barking up the wrong tree,<br />

scan the QR code with your smartphone or<br />

visit spdrs.com for details.<br />

Before investing, consider the funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges<br />

<strong>and</strong> expenses. To obtain a prospectus or summary prospectus, which contains<br />

this <strong>and</strong> other information, call 1.866.787.2257 or visit www.spdrs.com.<br />

Read it carefully.<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong> trade like s<strong>to</strong>cks, fl uctuate in market value <strong>and</strong> may trade at prices above or below the <strong>ETFs</strong> net asset value. Brokerage commissions <strong>and</strong> ETF expenses will<br />

reduce returns.<br />

The SPDR S&P 500 ® ETF Trust, SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ® ETF Trust <strong>and</strong> the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust are all unit investment trusts <strong>and</strong> issue<br />

shares intended <strong>to</strong> track performance of their respective benchmark indices.<br />

“SPDR,” S&P, S&P 500 <strong>and</strong> S&P MidCap 400 are registered trademarks of St<strong>and</strong>ard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC (“S&P”) <strong>and</strong> have been licensed for use <strong>by</strong> State Street<br />

Corporation. No fi nancial product offered <strong>by</strong> State Street or its affi liates is sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted <strong>by</strong> S&P.<br />

Distribu<strong>to</strong>r: State Street Global Markets, LLC, member FINRA, SIPC, a wholly owned subsidiary of State Street Corporation. References <strong>to</strong> State Street may include State Street Corporation<br />

<strong>and</strong> its affi liates. Certain State Street affi liates provide services <strong>and</strong> receive fees from the SPDR <strong>ETFs</strong>. ALPS Distribu<strong>to</strong>rs, Inc., a registered broker-dealer, is distribu<strong>to</strong>r for SPDR S&P 500 ETF<br />

Trust, SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust <strong>and</strong> SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust, all unit investment trusts <strong>and</strong> the Select Sec<strong>to</strong>r SPDRs Trust.<br />

IBG-3345


Why I Own: VIG<br />

Vanguard Dividend<br />

Appreciation ETF<br />

Name: Ben Tobias<br />

Title: President<br />

Firm: Tobias Financial Advisors<br />

Founded: 1980<br />

Location: Florida<br />

AUM: $180 million<br />

All <strong>ETFs</strong>? No<br />

ETFR: What is your favorite ETF at the<br />

moment?<br />

Tobias: Well, I’ll give you a choice: DLN<br />

[WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Fund]<br />

or VIG [Vanguard Dividend Appreciation<br />

ETF]. They’re both very similar, <strong>and</strong><br />

they select s<strong>to</strong>cks based on dividends.<br />

ETFR: What made you decide <strong>to</strong> buy<br />

in<strong>to</strong> VIG?<br />

Tobias: Basically, I’ve always thought<br />

that value is more appropriate for the<br />

kind of portfolios that we run than<br />

growth; there’s just a little bit less volatility.<br />

Moreover, our client base has a<br />

lot of preretirees <strong>and</strong> retirees, <strong>and</strong> income<br />

is a little bit more important than<br />

just capital gains. In the long run, I truly<br />

believe that value performs better than<br />

growth, <strong>and</strong> that the dividend yield is<br />

a large component of that. This is especially<br />

so in the case of VIG in terms<br />

of dividend increases: With VIG, the<br />

actual dollar amount of the dividend<br />

increases, but the percentage of the<br />

value doesn’t necessarily go up. Plus,<br />

over the long run, you can do a little<br />

bit better with a little bit less volatility.<br />

And as with most <strong>ETFs</strong> that we use,<br />

we like <strong>to</strong> use low expense ratios.<br />

ETFR: How does VIG help you overweight<br />

value?<br />

Tobias: Actually, these funds <strong>and</strong> the<br />

DFAs [Dimensional Fund Advisors] are<br />

almost all of our portfolios. You know,<br />

that’s most of where we go in. My<br />

background is in certified public accounting,<br />

<strong>and</strong> since those days, I’ve<br />

always been partial <strong>to</strong> the companies<br />

that have shown consistent growth in<br />

dividends. I feel that that’s a good corporate<br />

responsibility that every company<br />

should have. And I think the results<br />

speak for themselves over time.<br />

We do a lot of rebalancing. Rebalancing<br />

with <strong>ETFs</strong> makes life a little bit<br />

easier as far as doing the trades, <strong>and</strong><br />

sometimes setting prices, <strong>and</strong> things<br />

along those lines. Also—though hopefully<br />

we don’t have this for a while—<br />

the similarities <strong>and</strong> differences between<br />

these two <strong>ETFs</strong> mean that in the event<br />

that the market takes large swings, we<br />

could use these <strong>to</strong> book losses, <strong>and</strong> harvest<br />

tax losses in accounts where that is<br />

appropriate.<br />

ETFR: Looking at these two funds, DLN<br />

has a distribution yield of 2.43 percent—higher<br />

than VIG’s 2.13 percent—<br />

but the Vanguard product is much<br />

cheaper at only 18 basis points.<br />

Tobias: Yes, the pricing of the Vanguard<br />

fund is magnificent.<br />

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation<br />

Equity: U.S. - High Dividend Yield<br />

Issuer: Vanguard<br />

Legal Structure: 1940s Act<br />

Expense Ratio: 0.18%<br />

AUM: $6,317.15 billion<br />

ADV (60-Day): 685,000<br />

Avg. Spread: 0.03%<br />

Competing Funds:<br />

DLN, DVY, SDY, PEY<br />

Data as of: 06/08/11<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

June 7, 2010 – June 7, 2011<br />

ETFR: What is it that makes you have a<br />

preference for one over the other? And<br />

does that preference change over time<br />

as you’re holding the product?<br />

Tobias: It’s like, “What comes first, the<br />

chicken or the egg?” I’m not sure which<br />

one of their core principles works better.<br />

DLN is more dividend weighted,<br />

<strong>and</strong> VIG is more based on increasing<br />

dividends. There’s a little bit of a fundamental<br />

difference between the two<br />

of those, <strong>and</strong> honestly, I can’t decide.<br />

I’ve looked at the data for both, <strong>and</strong> I<br />

can’t decide which one I would prefer<br />

<strong>to</strong> be in, if I had <strong>to</strong> choose one or the<br />

other. I like them both.<br />

ETFR: Is the focus on these two dividend<br />

funds a new thing for you? There’s a lot<br />

of chatter in the headlines right now<br />

about dividends. Is this an area you’re<br />

focusing on now, or have you been here<br />

all along?<br />

Tobias: I’ll say we’ve been here all<br />

along, as far as focusing on dividends<br />

on the large-value side. VIG is a very<br />

new fund for us, though.<br />

Even though we’ve got well over 40<br />

percent of our overall portfolios in <strong>ETFs</strong>,<br />

I have stayed away from the smaller<br />

ones, the sec<strong>to</strong>rs ones, <strong>and</strong> things like<br />

that. I’m not comfortable with them.<br />

And again, I think it’s my background<br />

as an audi<strong>to</strong>r. The smaller you get, the<br />

more issues you can have, <strong>and</strong> I don’t<br />

like surprises.<br />

ETFR: Do the sizes of these two products fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

in<strong>to</strong> why you decided <strong>to</strong> go with them?<br />

Tobias: They’re large enough; I’m not<br />

necessarily looking for funds the size of<br />

IVV [iShares S&P 500 Index Fund] all<br />

the time. <br />

J J A S O N D J F M A M J<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

24.39%<br />

8 ETFR • July 2011


Rethinking Float<br />

By Gene Koyfman<br />

Consider two countries: China <strong>and</strong><br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

China is huge. It occupies nearly 10<br />

million square kilometers, has 1.3 billion<br />

people <strong>and</strong> has the second-largest<br />

economy in the world.<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>by</strong> contrast, is tiny. It occupies<br />

just 41,000 square kilometers, has<br />

fewer than 8 million citizens <strong>and</strong> has an<br />

economy one-tenth the size of China.<br />

Yet inves<strong>to</strong>rs in broad-based global<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ck funds like the iShares MSCI All-Country<br />

World Index ETF (NYSEArca: ACWI) currently<br />

put 43 percent more money <strong>to</strong> work<br />

in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> than they do in China.<br />

It’s not just Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Despite its<br />

size, China occupies just 2.33 percent of<br />

the most popular global index, <strong>and</strong> ranks<br />

ninth on the list of country allocations,<br />

below France, Australia <strong>and</strong> Germany.<br />

The reason has nothing <strong>to</strong> do with<br />

the size of its s<strong>to</strong>ck market. Depending<br />

on which day you check, China has either<br />

the second- or third-largest s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

market in the world, accounting for<br />

nearly 7 percent of <strong>to</strong>tal global market<br />

cap. But because of the rules indexers<br />

use <strong>to</strong> create their benchmarks, that 7<br />

percent weight gets chopped down <strong>to</strong><br />

the aforementioned 2.33 percent.<br />

That rule—called free-float adjustment—gets<br />

ignored <strong>by</strong> many inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

as the wonky inner workings of index<br />

geeks. But with a 4 percent-plus swing<br />

in China at stake <strong>and</strong> larger swings in<br />

other countries—it pays <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><br />

what’s going on, <strong>and</strong> why.<br />

How Free-Float<br />

Adjustment Works<br />

Fans of passive strategies will tell you the<br />

best way <strong>to</strong> invest is <strong>to</strong> simply own the<br />

market. The ideal approach, they say, is <strong>to</strong><br />

own an equity stake in each company in<br />

the proportion of its value in the market.<br />

Suppose, for instance, that there<br />

were only two companies in the world:<br />

BIG Co. <strong>and</strong> SMALL Inc. BIG’s s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

trades at $10 per share with 900 shares<br />

outst<strong>and</strong>ing, while SMALL’s s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

trades at $5 per share with 200 shares<br />

outst<strong>and</strong>ing. BIG is worth $9,000, <strong>and</strong><br />

SMALL is worth $1,000, meaning the<br />

two s<strong>to</strong>cks represent 90 <strong>and</strong> 10 percent<br />

of the market, respectively. An inves<strong>to</strong>r<br />

looking <strong>to</strong> own the entire market would<br />

put 90 percent of his money in<strong>to</strong> BIG<br />

Figure 1<br />

Float Criteria By Index Provider<br />

FLOAT RESTRICTED BY FTSE MSCI R<strong>US</strong>SELL S&P<br />

Block ownership Yes Yes<br />

Capital Controls<br />

Controlling<br />

shareholdings<br />

Source: Index providers<br />

Yes<br />

Yes Yes Yes<br />

Cross-holdings Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

ESOP Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

FDI or joint<br />

venture holdings<br />

Governmental holdings Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Insider holdings Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

IPO lockups<br />

Restricted shares Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Strategic holdings Yes Yes<br />

Foreign holdings restrictions Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Treasury shares Yes Yes Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

ETFR • July 2011 9


Figure 2<br />

The Float Effect<br />

COUNTRY<br />

UNADJ<strong>US</strong>TED<br />

MKT CAP<br />

United States 29.6% 42.3% 41.3%<br />

Japan 7.0% 7.7% 7.2%<br />

China 6.9% 2.3% 2.5%<br />

United Kingdom 6.6% 8.4% 8.2%<br />

Hong Kong 4.8% 1.3% 1.4%<br />

Canada 4.1% 4.6% 4.1%<br />

France 3.6% 3.9% 4.5%<br />

India 2.8% 1.0% 1.3%<br />

Brazil 2.8% 1.9% 2.3%<br />

Germany 3.1% 3.4% 3.5%<br />

Australia 2.7% 3.4% 3.4%<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong> 2.5% 3.3% 3.0%<br />

Source: Bloomberg. Data as of June 13, 2011.<br />

<strong>and</strong> 10 percent in<strong>to</strong> SMALL.<br />

That’s the way the first market-capweighted<br />

indexes were built.<br />

But during the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s, as<br />

money started <strong>to</strong> flow in<strong>to</strong> passive index<br />

strategies, indexers realized something:<br />

This perfect representation of<br />

the market wouldn’t work in the long<br />

run because the market <strong>and</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ck ownership<br />

structures are complex.<br />

Specifically, while a company like BIG<br />

may have had 900 shares outst<strong>and</strong>ing,<br />

not all of those are actually available<br />

for sale. Some are held <strong>by</strong> corporate<br />

insiders who can’t sell due <strong>to</strong> lockup<br />

requirements; others are held <strong>by</strong> other<br />

companies who won’t sell because it’s a<br />

strategic investment. Let’s imagine, for<br />

the sake of argument, that only 10 percent<br />

of the shares are available—just 90<br />

shares, worth $900. What happens if an<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>r wants <strong>to</strong> put $2,000 <strong>to</strong> work in<br />

this index? There’s nowhere for it <strong>to</strong> go.<br />

As Lori Richards, Benchmark Business<br />

managing direc<strong>to</strong>r at Russell Investments,<br />

explained, “Indexes should<br />

be representative of the opportunity<br />

set available <strong>to</strong> managers.”<br />

ISHARES ACWI<br />

VANGUARD<br />

TOTAL WORLD<br />

David Blitzer, managing direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

<strong>and</strong> chairman of the Index Committee<br />

at S&P Indices, pointed out that “the<br />

index should be the same as if you calculated<br />

a portfolio representing all the<br />

shares <strong>and</strong> all the s<strong>to</strong>cks in the market.<br />

And if the founder of some company<br />

wasn’t going <strong>to</strong> sell his shares no matter<br />

what happened, then his shares aren’t<br />

really in the market, so they ought <strong>to</strong><br />

be adjusted out.”<br />

Blitzer explained, “If I included a<br />

U.S. company with a 12 percent float<br />

in the S&P 500 [at full weight], <strong>and</strong> the<br />

indexers followed suit, all the shares<br />

would be owned <strong>by</strong> the indexers.” The<br />

share prices would be bid up <strong>by</strong> inves<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

dis<strong>to</strong>rting <strong>and</strong> overstating the actual<br />

value of the s<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />

Going back <strong>to</strong> our theoretical example,<br />

if 800 shares of BIG’s s<strong>to</strong>ck are<br />

locked up due <strong>to</strong> legal restrictions, only<br />

100 shares are truly available for trading.<br />

Because an indexer adjusting for<br />

float only considers the shares available<br />

for trading when building a benchmark,<br />

the resulting weightings in the index<br />

would be 50 percent BIG <strong>and</strong> 50 percent<br />

SMALL, dramatically different from<br />

what the unadjusted weightings would<br />

be. And any money invested in the index<br />

would stream in cleanly <strong>and</strong> efficiently.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Blitzer, “The S&P 500<br />

traditionally was not float adjusted.”<br />

However, the index excluded entirely<br />

any s<strong>to</strong>ck that does not have 50 percent<br />

in public float, there<strong>by</strong> reducing<br />

liquidity concerns.<br />

Essentially, no indexes were adjusted<br />

for float until fairly recently. In 1984, Russell<br />

Indexes launched the Russell 1000<br />

<strong>and</strong> Russell 2000 indexes, the first U.S.<br />

indexes float adjusted from inception. A<br />

few years later, in 1989, the predecessor<br />

<strong>to</strong> what is currently the S&P Global Broad<br />

Market Index Family was launched; its<br />

methodology included rules for adjusting<br />

the float of the constituents <strong>and</strong><br />

made additional adjustments for restrictions<br />

on foreign holdings.<br />

That basically opened the floodgates,<br />

setting an industry st<strong>and</strong>ard for<br />

cap-weighted indexes that is followed<br />

<strong>by</strong> every major index provider.<br />

“[Float adjustment] has definitely<br />

become the industry st<strong>and</strong>ard practice.<br />

I don’t know of any cap-weighted index<br />

that’s not float adjusted,” Blitzer said.<br />

Differing Opinions<br />

But should it be st<strong>and</strong>ard practice?<br />

Little consensus exists about the<br />

different methods of float adjustment.<br />

Some adjustments address legal restrictions<br />

on the trading of shares such as<br />

IPO lockups <strong>and</strong> foreign holding restrictions.<br />

Other adjustments of a more<br />

subjective nature are made <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong><br />

account holdings <strong>by</strong> individuals or organizations<br />

that are not expected <strong>to</strong><br />

sell their stakes in the near future. According<br />

<strong>to</strong> Russell’s Richards, the three<br />

most important fac<strong>to</strong>rs are beneficial<br />

owners, such as officers or direc<strong>to</strong>rs of<br />

a company holding blocks of shares;<br />

cross-ownership, which occurs when<br />

companies own shares in other companies;<br />

<strong>and</strong> IPO lockups.<br />

Real-World Implications<br />

The decision whether or not <strong>to</strong> make<br />

float adjustments has far-reaching<br />

global implications for indexers. How-<br />

10 ETFR • July 2011


ever, these implications vary according<br />

<strong>to</strong> the market scenario.<br />

“[Float adjustment] is far more significant<br />

in emerging markets than in<br />

developed markets, <strong>and</strong> it is far more<br />

significant outside the U.S. than inside<br />

the U.S., <strong>and</strong> that’s just the way the<br />

world is at this point,” Blitzer noted.<br />

Adjusted or not, the United States, as<br />

the world’s largest economy, inevitably<br />

holds the largest country weighting in<br />

any global index. U.S. companies represent<br />

29.6 percent of the <strong>to</strong>tal world<br />

capitalization. By comparison, the<br />

iShares MSCI ACWI Index Fund (NasdaqGM:<br />

ACWI), which aims <strong>to</strong> track the<br />

float-adjusted MSCI All Country World<br />

Index, allocates a weighting of 42.3<br />

percent <strong>to</strong> the United States. As mentioned,<br />

China’s 6.9 percent market capitalization<br />

gets adjusted down sharply<br />

as well. Funds tracking FTSE <strong>and</strong> S&P<br />

indices show similar deviations.<br />

Kevin Carter, co-founder <strong>and</strong> head<br />

of index development at AlphaShares,<br />

takes a firm position against this very<br />

practice. “Float-adjustment fac<strong>to</strong>rs, in<br />

my mind, are bad from start <strong>to</strong> finish,”<br />

he said. “If there’s $60 billion of Petro-<br />

China, is there any manager that can’t<br />

get what he wants? I underst<strong>and</strong> the<br />

reason for it, but the reason has gone<br />

<strong>to</strong>o far. People apply it as a measure for<br />

something it’s <strong>to</strong>tally irrelevant <strong>to</strong>.”<br />

Adjusting Out The Float<br />

An inves<strong>to</strong>r wishing <strong>to</strong> forgo the float<br />

adjustment has <strong>to</strong> do the work <strong>to</strong> remove<br />

the adjustment from his portfolio.<br />

One way <strong>to</strong> do this is <strong>to</strong> adjust one’s<br />

country exposure, despite the fact that<br />

float adjustments are made at the company<br />

level. But upping one’s exposure<br />

<strong>to</strong> a country like China can lead <strong>to</strong> accusations<br />

of active management.<br />

“The problem is, [you] call it ‘overweight’<br />

<strong>and</strong> a flag goes up, <strong>and</strong> it sounds<br />

like you’re taking on risk. We talk <strong>to</strong> institutions<br />

<strong>and</strong> they say: ‘We have a huge<br />

bet in China: We have 3 percent in China.’<br />

And they’re serious. They’re thinking<br />

they’ve gone so far from their benchmark<br />

that they might get fired for it. It’s just<br />

preposterous,” Carter explained.<br />

Disregarding trading cost for a moment,<br />

an inves<strong>to</strong>r wishing <strong>to</strong> construct<br />

a portfolio that is not adjusted for float<br />

would accomplish this <strong>by</strong> purchasing<br />

the unadjusted proportions via an index<br />

fund or ETF tracking the country’s index.<br />

iShares has <strong>ETFs</strong> tracking almost every<br />

country in the world, there<strong>by</strong> allowing<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>rs the flexibility <strong>to</strong> achieve their<br />

desired country weightings. The math<br />

<strong>to</strong> get the proportion of assets <strong>to</strong> allocate<br />

<strong>to</strong> the two funds may require a little<br />

algebra, but not much else.<br />

At its core, the issue comes down <strong>to</strong><br />

intent <strong>and</strong> purpose.<br />

From an index provider’s perspective,<br />

a market-cap-weighted index, Richards<br />

noted, “You would always float-adjust.<br />

It is kind of irresponsible not <strong>to</strong>.” The<br />

adjustment fac<strong>to</strong>rs define the opportunity<br />

set available if all inves<strong>to</strong>rs chose <strong>to</strong><br />

index <strong>and</strong> managers needed <strong>to</strong> go in<strong>to</strong><br />

the market <strong>to</strong> procure shares in quantities<br />

not readily available.<br />

However, from the perspective of an<br />

individual inves<strong>to</strong>r who wishes <strong>to</strong> passively<br />

own the market in its entirety,<br />

adjusting for float adds tilts that dis<strong>to</strong>rt<br />

the proportions of the global market’s<br />

full value. Thus it falls on the individual<br />

<strong>to</strong> adjust his holdings <strong>to</strong> counterbalance<br />

the adjustments embedded in the<br />

index methodologies. <br />

Why advertise in the Journal of Indexes?<br />

JOURNAL OF INDEXES ADVERTISING INFORMATION<br />

AT WWW.JOURNALOFINDEXES.COM/ADVERTISE<br />

Index Publications LLC, 353 Sacramen<strong>to</strong> St., Suite 1520, San Francisco, CA 94111 • Advertising <strong>and</strong> Reprints Inquiries: 415.659.9004<br />

ETFR • July 2011 11


GSG Tracking from page 1<br />

Figure 1<br />

GSG His<strong>to</strong>rical Performance Compared<br />

PERIOD<br />

S&P GSCI TOTAL<br />

RETURN INDEX<br />

RETURN<br />

ISHARES S&P GSCI<br />

COMMODITY-<br />

INDEXED TR<strong>US</strong>T<br />

(GSG) RETURN<br />

IPATH S&P GSCI<br />

TOTAL RETURN<br />

INDEX ETN (GSP)<br />

RETURN<br />

GSG VS.<br />

BENCHMARK<br />

GSP VS.<br />

BENCHMARK<br />

2006 -18.79% -18.79% -19.11% 0.00% -0.32%<br />

2007 32.67% 31.45% 31.99% -1.22% -0.68%<br />

2008 -46.49% -47.47% -47.74% -0.98% -1.26%<br />

2009 13.49% 15.12% 13.17% 1.64% -0.31%<br />

2010 9.03% 7.83% 8.59% -1.19% -0.44%<br />

2011 YTD 6.13% 3.95% 6.03% -2.18% -0.10%<br />

Since<br />

Inception<br />

-23.56% -27.54% -26.56% -3.97% -3.00%<br />

Sources: Issuers, Bloomberg. Data as of June 6, 2011<br />

fect tracking of GSP comes with an important<br />

caveat: counterparty risk. As a<br />

debt note, GSP is fully susceptible <strong>to</strong> a<br />

default <strong>by</strong> Barclays. In the event that<br />

Barclays defaults, GSP inves<strong>to</strong>rs will<br />

face substantial losses. The worst-case<br />

scenario is something akin <strong>to</strong> the failure<br />

of Lehman Brothers in 2008, which<br />

essentially wiped out inves<strong>to</strong>rs in three<br />

ETNs issued <strong>by</strong> that company.<br />

GSG doesn’t share that counterparty<br />

risk; it is structured as a trust. That means<br />

it actually purchases <strong>and</strong> holds assets designed<br />

<strong>to</strong> provide exposure <strong>to</strong> the S&P<br />

GSCI. Shareholders in the fund have a<br />

pro rata stake in those underlying holdings,<br />

<strong>and</strong> no default <strong>by</strong> iShares’ parent<br />

company BlackRock can take that away.<br />

GSG is a bit unusual in that, unlike<br />

most commodity <strong>ETFs</strong>, it purchases a specific<br />

type of futures contract traded on<br />

the Chicago Mercantile Exchange called<br />

commodity excess return futures, or<br />

CERFs. Unlike traditional futures contracts,<br />

CERFs are designed <strong>to</strong> provide long-term<br />

exposure <strong>to</strong> a given asset class. The CME<br />

has listed two CERF contracts since 2006,<br />

which have had durations of five years<br />

<strong>and</strong> three <strong>and</strong> a half years, respectively.<br />

That contrasts with typical futures contracts<br />

that expire monthly or quarterly.<br />

There are a number of potential reasons<br />

why iShares chose CERFs rather<br />

than traditional futures contracts <strong>to</strong><br />

underlie the GSG product. The first<br />

is transaction costs: By having <strong>to</strong> roll<br />

over its contracts less frequently, GSG<br />

should reap savings—at least in theory.<br />

That’s offset <strong>by</strong> the fact that the CERFs<br />

GSG holds are relatively illiquid. iShares<br />

dominates the market for CERFs, holding<br />

more than 88 percent of the current<br />

open interest.<br />

The Source Of Recent<br />

Tracking Error<br />

One obvious question is whether the<br />

use of CERFs—as opposed <strong>to</strong> traditional<br />

(<strong>and</strong> more liquid) futures contracts—<br />

has increased the likelihood of negative<br />

tracking error for GSG.<br />

A look at the annual returns for GSG<br />

suggests otherwise. In 2009, for instance,<br />

GSG actually outperformed its<br />

benchmark <strong>by</strong> 1.64 percent. That move<br />

came after two years of underperformance,<br />

which may indicate that the<br />

fund’s tracking error is mean-reverting.<br />

The long-term track record backs that<br />

up. Since inception in 2006, GSG has returned<br />

-27.54 percent, just 3.97 percent<br />

below the benchmark return. That is very<br />

close <strong>to</strong> the 3.70 underperformance that<br />

would be expected based solely on the<br />

0.75 percent annual expense ratio compounded<br />

over five years.<br />

While it’s impossible <strong>to</strong> say exactly<br />

what caused GSG’s recent underperformance,<br />

there are two leading theories—both<br />

of which, curiously, actually<br />

augur well for the fund.<br />

The first is that 2011 was the firstever<br />

roll <strong>by</strong> GSG. With the starting<br />

round of contracts expiring, iShares<br />

had <strong>to</strong> roll the entire portfolio in<strong>to</strong> new<br />

contracts. This could theoretically have<br />

led <strong>to</strong> slippage.<br />

There’s no exact way <strong>to</strong> test this,<br />

however, <strong>and</strong> the previous variability<br />

of tracking performance says that this<br />

is unlikely <strong>to</strong> be the true driver of the<br />

returns difference. If it were, inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

would not have <strong>to</strong> worry about it again<br />

until the spring of 2014, when the next<br />

wave of CERFs expire.<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> more likely explanation<br />

is futures mispricing, where<strong>by</strong><br />

GSG’s underlying holdings—the CME<br />

CERFs—trade away from their intrinsic<br />

value. Futures contracts are designed<br />

<strong>to</strong> converge with spot returns <strong>by</strong> expiration;<br />

prior <strong>to</strong> expiration, they may<br />

temporarily trade away from “fair value.”<br />

Under this scenario, the vacillating<br />

tracking performance would be driven<br />

<strong>by</strong> movements above <strong>and</strong> below fair<br />

value for the underlying contracts.<br />

This would cause the tracking error <strong>to</strong><br />

be roughly mean-reverting—after all, the<br />

CERFs must revert <strong>to</strong> fair value <strong>by</strong> their<br />

expiration in March 2014. If they underperformed<br />

this year, then one might ex-<br />

12 ETFR • July 2011


pect them <strong>to</strong> reverse course in ensuing<br />

years. That roughly aligns with the variable<br />

annual tracking performance we’ve<br />

seen since GSG’s launch in 2006, <strong>and</strong><br />

would suggest that periods of underperformance<br />

will eventually be matched <strong>by</strong><br />

periods of outperformance.<br />

GSG Vs. GSP<br />

In short, we can expect <strong>to</strong> see the different<br />

tracking experiences continue.<br />

While this year’s 2.18 percent underperformance<br />

is concerning, his<strong>to</strong>ry suggests<br />

that much of that may be reversed<br />

in the future. This is especially true in<br />

light of GSG’s extremely solid tracking<br />

performance since the trust’s inception.<br />

Rival GSP—the ETN—has had more<br />

consistent performance, staying tighter<br />

with the underlying index. Over the long<br />

haul, it has generated slightly superior<br />

performance for inves<strong>to</strong>rs, with a 3 percent<br />

underperformance over the same<br />

period compared <strong>to</strong> GSG’s 3.97 percent.<br />

For many inves<strong>to</strong>rs, the tigher<br />

tracking performance of GSP must be<br />

weighed against its greater credit risk<br />

<strong>and</strong> inferior liquidity, with the latter<br />

point being perhaps the most important<br />

consideration. <br />

Hidden In The Margins from page 6<br />

es,” CME’s McCormick confirmed. “The<br />

goal is never <strong>to</strong> affect the price or send<br />

a message. The goal is simply <strong>to</strong> ensure<br />

that the clearinghouse has enough assets<br />

on h<strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> cover the volatility we<br />

see in the market.”<br />

Sound And Fury<br />

Even if the goal is not <strong>to</strong> move the market,<br />

can the CME inadvertently push commodities<br />

prices around? In the case of silver, the<br />

argument that margin increases popped<br />

the bubble looks profoundly weak.<br />

Based on margin data provided <strong>by</strong> the<br />

CME, it’s clear that the margin increases<br />

didn’t ramp up until the price of silver<br />

had already peaked on April 29. At that<br />

point, with the price of silver at $48.60<br />

per troy ounce, the amount of collateral<br />

required <strong>to</strong> purchase a contract was at 6<br />

percent of the <strong>to</strong>tal contract value. The<br />

CME clearing group further increased initial<br />

<strong>and</strong> maintenance margins three more<br />

times, but at this point silver prices were<br />

already tumbling back down <strong>to</strong> Earth.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> this data, not only did the<br />

clearinghouse not manipulate the market,<br />

it was slow <strong>to</strong> act as prices escalated. Only<br />

when the bubble burst, on May 3 through<br />

May 9, did the clearinghouse start making<br />

bold hikes in margin percentage. At that<br />

point, the fall in price had led <strong>to</strong> extreme<br />

amounts of volatility in the market.<br />

“You can probably conclude that the<br />

price of silver was rising <strong>and</strong> the CME was<br />

playing catch-up. What you can’t conclude<br />

from any of this is that their margin<br />

changes are the approximate cause of the<br />

price changes,” said John Hyl<strong>and</strong>, founder<br />

of U.S. Commodities Indexes. “The<br />

notional value of a contract was going<br />

down, but the volatility was going up; so<br />

Figure 1<br />

Margins Of Error<br />

$50<br />

$45<br />

$40<br />

$35<br />

$30<br />

$25<br />

$20<br />

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May<br />

2010 2011<br />

■ Silver Price (troy ounce)<br />

Sources: CME Group, Bloomberg<br />

● Margin<br />

that could have been the catalyst there.”<br />

Even fac<strong>to</strong>ring in the lack of transparency,<br />

it’s hard <strong>to</strong> believe that the changes<br />

CME pushes can actually affect market<br />

prices—especially for those using <strong>ETFs</strong> for<br />

their commodities exposure. According<br />

<strong>to</strong> Hyl<strong>and</strong>, that’s one of the problems with<br />

margin conspiracy theories. “People say<br />

you’ll cause the price <strong>to</strong> fall. Well, why?<br />

What you’re doing is forcing out people<br />

who can’t post up more margins.”<br />

He points <strong>to</strong> highly leveraged investments<br />

as the only concerning point when<br />

it comes <strong>to</strong> margins: Instead of the entire<br />

6.3%<br />

5.7%<br />

FUND<br />

6.0%<br />

10.5%<br />

7.6%<br />

11.6%<br />

market shaking when margins increase<br />

<strong>by</strong> $600, it’s truly only the leveraged positions<br />

that get eroded <strong>by</strong> increases. “Any<br />

unlevered buyer is probably indifferent<br />

<strong>to</strong> what the margin is,” said Hyl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Even with compelling evidence, the<br />

conspiracy theories are unlikely <strong>to</strong> die out.<br />

But as more inves<strong>to</strong>rs dip their collective<br />

<strong>to</strong>es in<strong>to</strong> the commodities asset class,<br />

converting fiction <strong>to</strong> fact will become<br />

ever-more important. “The justification of<br />

having margins is <strong>to</strong> protect the clearing<br />

process, pure <strong>and</strong> simple,” said Hyl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

“It’s not <strong>to</strong> manipulate the price.” <br />

ETFR • July 2011 13


ETF Analytics<br />

How Do You Find the Right ETF?<br />

In 2010, the most popular China ETF was also the worst-performing China<br />

fund on the market. A lesser-known competi<strong>to</strong>r beat it <strong>by</strong> nearly 8%.<br />

Two emerging markets <strong>ETFs</strong> track the exact same index, but one<br />

delivered a 3% higher return in 2010.<br />

ETF Analytics: The Complete ETF Research Solution<br />

Institutional-Caliber Research.<br />

Quant-Driven Process. Plain-English Analysis.<br />

} Easy <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> rating system:<br />

Efficiency, Tradability, Fit<br />

} Reports <strong>and</strong> research on every U.S.-listed ETF <strong>and</strong> ETN.<br />

} Robust “segment” reports comparing <strong>ETFs</strong> in 300+<br />

different areas of the market; e.g., “Broad-Based<br />

China,” “Short-Term Treasurys.”<br />

} Quant-driven analysis backed <strong>by</strong> plain-English<br />

explanations, making it easy <strong>to</strong> convey the value<br />

<strong>to</strong> clients.<br />

} Hundreds of data points updated daily.<br />

} Proprietary data points on block-level liquidity, fund<br />

closure risk <strong>and</strong> more.<br />

} Industry-Leading ETF <strong>Class</strong>ification System.<br />

ETF Analytics rates, ranks <strong>and</strong> evaluates every ETF <strong>and</strong> ETN on<br />

the market. Our goal? Provide institutional-caliber ETF research<br />

that helps professional advisors answer the question:<br />

“What are the best <strong>ETFs</strong> for my clients?”<br />

Redefining how inves<strong>to</strong>rs approach the ETF market.<br />

To register for our beta release, contact Dan Benveniste at danb@indexuniverse.com or 415-659-9013.<br />

www.indexuniverse.com/analytics<br />

©2011 Index Publications, LLC, IndexUniverse ETF Analytics


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

Alternatives<br />

PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest DBV 0.75 371.1 3.77 4.30 0.85 21.22 -2.59 - - - 14.92 -<br />

Cambria Global Tactical GTAA 0.99 173.3 0.48 3.55 - - - - 10,355 16.1 - -<br />

PowerShares S&P 500 BuyWrite PBP 0.75 119.0 1.78 3.49 4.89 24.00 -1.69 - 51,276 16.4 16.63 1.17<br />

iShares Diversie Alternatives ALT 0.95 129.5 0.81 3.00 1.62 - - - - - - -<br />

IQ Hee ulti-Stratey Tracer QAI 1.13 130.7 2.47 1.57 2.59 - - - 12,317 15.4 - 1.49<br />

iPath S&P 500 VIX i-Term utures T VXZ 0.89 765.2 -11.05 -24.25 -14.43 - - - - - - -<br />

iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term utures T VXX 0.89 1,274.5 -29.46 -43.39 -72.40 - - - - - - -<br />

WisomTree anae utures Stratey WDTI 0.95 124.5 0.73 - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Asset</strong> Allocation<br />

PowerShares C Income Comosite PC 1.62 233.3 4.62 7.28 - - - - 42,746 15.3 - 8.34<br />

iShares S&P Growth Allocation AOR 0.32 109.4 2.40 5.52 11.14 18.99 - - 19,670 16.6 - 1.85<br />

Commodities<br />

TS Physical Silver SIVR 0.30 688.0 13.57 24.77 82.16 - - - - - - -<br />

iShares Silver SLV 0.50 12,347.2 13.56 24.59 82.48 47.67 31.14 24.39 - - 41.36 -<br />

PowerShares DB Silver DBS 0.75 201.5 13.83 23.96 81.16 47.07 30.02 - - - 41.52 -<br />

Unite States Gasoline UGA 0.90 141.6 7.41 20.20 15.11 87.97 -6.72 - - - 42.98 -<br />

Teucrium Corn COR 1.71 131.3 3.64 16.12 - - - - - - - -<br />

PowerShares DB nery DB 0.75 235.3 3.07 14.88 2.63 30.36 -13.95 - - - 32.90 -<br />

TS Physical Precious etal Baset Shares GLTR 0.60 240.5 9.48 13.27 - - - - - - - -<br />

iPath Dow Jones-UBS Precious etals T JJP 0.75 141.7 9.98 11.20 41.91 28.42 - - - - - -<br />

PowerShares DB Precious etals DBP 0.75 539.4 9.70 10.90 37.56 26.58 20.88 - - - 24.29 -<br />

PowerShares DB Commoity Tracin DBC 0.85 6,298.3 1.78 9.80 11.90 16.19 -8.80 4.82 - - 26.81 -<br />

PowerShares DB Oil DBO 0.75 627.0 2.37 8.87 2.36 42.92 -13.27 - - - 35.33 -<br />

Unite States 12 onth Oil <strong>US</strong>L 0.96 234.0 3.48 8.52 6.52 35.36 -14.60 - - - 33.81 -<br />

iPath Dow Jones-UBS Coee T JO 0.75 128.3 -4.50 8.15 65.37 14.76 - - - - - -<br />

iPath S&P GSCI T GSP 0.75 124.2 0.95 8.00 8.36 15.25 -18.75 - - - 32.02 -<br />

TS Physical Swiss Gol SGOL 0.39 1,381.2 8.69 7.90 29.23 - - - - - - -<br />

SPDR Gol GLD 0.40 59,788.8 8.70 7.87 29.27 24.03 19.61 18.43 - - 20.97 -<br />

iShares Gol Trust IAU 0.25 6,795.0 8.70 7.84 29.46 23.90 19.67 18.48 - - 20.88 -<br />

PowerShares DB Gol DGL 0.75 258.7 8.39 7.38 27.89 22.03 18.07 - - - 20.97 -<br />

LTS Roers International Commoity T RJI 0.75 928.9 -0.51 6.60 17.86 26.45 -8.22 - - - 27.60 -<br />

iShares S&P GSCI Commoity GSG 0.75 1,729.0 0.50 6.36 7.17 11.22 -18.86 - - - 31.46 -<br />

GreenHaven Continuous Commoity GCC 0.85 767.2 -1.22 5.92 25.19 20.07 1.13 - - - 21.52 -<br />

Unite States Commoity <strong>US</strong>CI 1.24 473.0 -4.61 4.82 - - - - - - - -<br />

iPath S&P GSCI Crue Oil T OIL 0.75 639.9 3.56 4.53 -1.04 11.22 -29.49 - - - 41.64 -<br />

UBS -TRACS CCI T UCI 0.65 157.2 -1.60 4.24 18.61 40.58 -3.05 - - - 26.82 -<br />

Unite States Oil <strong>US</strong>O 0.80 1,576.8 3.34 3.85 -0.71 18.67 -26.75 -9.77 - - 39.15 -<br />

TS Physical Platinum PPLT 0.60 788.5 1.22 3.15 - - - - - - - -<br />

iPath Dow Jones-UBS Commoity T DJP 0.75 3,212.7 - 2.46 16.23 20.09 -8.41 - - - 24.21 -<br />

iPath Dow Jones UBS Grains T JJG 0.75 303.4 -1.38 2.20 29.85 -1.86 -4.14 - - - 32.74 -<br />

PowerShares DB Ariculture DBA 0.75 3,273.0 -6.41 1.17 22.35 0.99 -1.96 - - - 23.26 -<br />

LTS RICI Ariculture T RJA 0.75 655.3 -6.07 1.12 35.01 6.29 -0.49 - - - 26.62 -<br />

iPath Dow Jones UBS Ariculture T JJA 0.75 269.0 -4.11 1.11 38.40 13.17 3.08 - - - 28.22 -<br />

iPath Dow Jones-UBS atural Gas T GAZ 0.75 119.3 11.71 0.75 -43.63 -51.15 -51.82 - - - 38.05 -<br />

Unite States atural Gas UG 1.11 2,042.4 9.37 -1.61 -40.56 -56.50 -52.68 - - - 37.20 -<br />

PowerShares DB Base etals DBB 0.75 604.0 -5.33 -1.76 8.58 88.92 0.86 - - - 30.10 -<br />

TS Physical Pallaium PALL 0.60 785.9 -3.12 -3.63 - - - - - - - -<br />

iPath Dow Jones-UBS Coer T JJC 0.75 210.0 -7.48 -6.51 29.04 133.55 2.66 - - - 36.69 -<br />

Currency<br />

CurrencyShares Swiss ranc X 0.40 731.2 8.82 9.25 10.54 2.21 6.73 - - - 15.00 -<br />

CurrencyShares Sweish rona XS 0.40 136.9 2.69 8.62 6.96 9.01 -0.33 - - - 17.52 0.42<br />

WisomTree Dreyus Brailian Real BZ 0.45 176.7 6.96 8.29 12.46 34.01 9.40 - - - 18.87 -<br />

CurrencyShares uro X 0.40 365.3 4.36 7.76 -6.87 2.53 -2.01 3.95 - - 15.42 0.03<br />

CurrencyShares Australian Dollar XA 0.40 839.3 5.88 6.08 17.87 29.29 7.49 - - - 19.68 3.40<br />

PowerShares DB <strong>US</strong> Dollar Bearish UD 0.75 171.9 3.17 5.79 -1.60 5.19 -0.45 - - - 11.59 -<br />

WisomTree Dreyus Commoity Currency CCX 0.55 146.1 4.73 5.49 - - - - - - - -<br />

CurrencyShares British Poun Sterlin XB 0.40 139.0 1.12 4.91 -3.33 10.62 -5.58 - - - 12.46 -<br />

CurrencyShares Canaian Dollar XC 0.40 867.4 0.31 3.19 4.96 15.24 1.03 - - - 13.20 0.06<br />

WisomTree Dreyus merin Currency CW 0.55 583.6 3.48 2.70 6.40 - - - - - - -<br />

WisomTree Dreyus Chinese uan CB 0.45 668.4 0.43 0.43 1.21 1.20 1.14 - - - 2.80 -<br />

CurrencyShares Jaanese en X 0.40 176.2 0.26 -0.57 14.20 -3.16 8.55 - - - 11.32 -<br />

Inverse<br />

VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short Term T XIV 1.35 117.9 33.46 57.40 - - - - - - - -<br />

iPath U.S. Treasury lattener T LAT 0.75 128.7 6.01 4.82 - - - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort en CS 0.95 368.4 -1.83 -0.83 -26.43 -2.52 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares Short SCI merin arets U 0.95 220.7 -7.08 -4.04 -20.92 -50.67 -22.26 - - - 26.48 -<br />

ProShares Short 20 ear Treasury TB 0.95 996.2 -6.12 -5.79 -12.39 - - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort inancials S 0.95 308.0 6.05 -5.97 -35.33 -76.48 -48.85 - - - 65.65 -<br />

Yield<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

ETFR • July 2011 15


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

Inverse (Continued)<br />

PowerShares DB <strong>US</strong> Dollar Bullish UUP 0.75 1,139.8 -3.40 -6.04 -1.60 -6.52 -1.83 - - - 12.05 -<br />

ProShares Short SCI A Z 0.95 103.8 -2.06 -7.77 -14.24 -30.36 -9.21 - - - 25.87 -<br />

ProShares Short S&P 500 SH 0.92 1,501.1 -2.28 -7.94 -16.59 -27.02 -9.17 - - - 20.62 -<br />

ProShares Short QQQ PSQ 0.95 234.6 -1.94 -7.99 -20.61 -40.20 -14.16 - - - 23.02 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort 7-10 ear Treasur PST 0.95 464.3 -8.58 -8.60 -21.51 2.43 -18.70 - - - 16.12 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort SCI merin arets V 0.95 118.2 -14.18 -8.96 -41.82 -79.25 -54.25 - - - 49.50 -<br />

ProShares Short Dow30 DOG 0.95 231.3 -3.89 -9.63 -15.29 -23.66 -9.76 - - - 19.34 -<br />

ProShares Short Russell 2000 RW 0.95 398.3 -4.44 -9.79 -27.39 -32.86 -18.17 - - - 26.14 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort 20 ear Treasur TBT 0.95 5,771.8 -11.85 -10.45 -25.74 32.20 -22.95 - - - 33.31 -<br />

Direion Dail inancial Bear 3 AZ 1.15 613.8 9.00 -11.07 -51.36 -94.56 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Basic aterials S 0.95 105.0 -7.25 -13.62 -54.68 -78.16 -42.15 - - - 61.31 -<br />

PowerShares DB Crue Oil Doule Short T DTO 0.75 223.2 -12.99 -15.42 -20.26 -54.19 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 SDS 0.90 2,034.9 -4.78 -15.48 -32.21 -50.59 -24.16 - - - 38.94 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort QQQ QID 0.95 693.7 -4.02 -15.75 -38.90 -66.80 -32.59 - - - 43.61 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort uro UO 0.95 502.4 -9.42 -15.76 8.61 -12.04 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort TSXinhua China 25 XP 0.95 173.7 -16.17 -15.89 -28.30 -76.27 -57.77 - - - 53.42 -<br />

Direion Dail 30-ear Treasur Bear 3 TV 1.14 480.8 -18.01 -16.04 -36.69 - - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort DJ-UBS Crue Oil SCO 0.95 132.3 -13.77 -16.50 -25.49 -56.89 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Dow 30 DXD 0.95 339.3 -7.76 -18.45 -29.76 -44.98 -24.05 - - - 36.60 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Russell 2000 TW 0.95 443.2 -9.25 -19.55 -50.14 -60.27 -40.90 - - - 49.92 -<br />

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 SPXU 0.95 301.5 -7.54 -22.87 -46.51 - - - - - - -<br />

Direion Dail Lare Ca Bear 3 BGZ 1.02 170.5 -8.60 -24.17 -48.74 -70.71 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Real state SRS 0.95 173.3 -10.53 -25.08 -51.63 -85.21 -67.34 - - - 70.52 -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas DUG 0.95 115.2 0.11 -26.08 -41.26 -49.12 -36.95 - - - 44.83 -<br />

Direion Dail Small Ca Bear 3 TZA 1.15 539.2 -14.47 -29.17 -68.34 -79.41 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraShort Silver ZSL 0.95 524.7 -47.59 -59.04 -79.50 -72.65 - - - - - -<br />

Leveraged<br />

Direion Dail Real state Bull 3 DR 1.03 121.4 14.78 42.80 63.51 - - - - - - 0.48<br />

Direion Dail ner Bull 3 RX 1.03 416.3 -8.57 35.40 48.96 14.71 - - - - - 0.06<br />

ProShares Ultra Silver AGQ 0.95 1,146.2 11.24 30.65 182.44 78.25 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares Ultra Real state UR 0.95 562.1 8.31 26.49 48.36 12.10 -27.55 - - - 72.20 0.65<br />

ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas DIG 0.95 383.5 -5.23 25.37 33.69 20.59 -20.22 - - - 52.20 0.37<br />

Direion Dail Lare Ca Bull 3 BGU 1.18 241.6 4.34 22.80 39.81 65.15 - - - - - 0.18<br />

Direion Dail Small Ca Bull 3 TA 1.03 756.1 7.42 22.73 69.81 42.94 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 UPRO 0.95 283.2 3.62 21.90 36.37 - - - - - - 0.12<br />

ProShares Ultra iCa 400 VV 0.95 166.9 7.14 20.70 52.88 68.15 -1.41 - - - 50.99 0.01<br />

ProShares UltraPro QQQ TQQQ 0.95 132.3 1.46 19.60 - - - - - - - -<br />

ProShares Ultra Dow30 DD 0.95 340.1 6.07 18.97 25.37 39.71 -3.76 - - - 40.62 0.46<br />

ProShares Ultra Russell 2000 UW 0.95 279.5 5.70 16.33 50.63 42.89 -3.57 - - - 54.53 0.01<br />

ProShares Ultra S&P 500 SSO 0.92 1,678.2 2.82 14.72 26.86 47.27 -8.40 - - - 44.40 0.61<br />

Direion Dail Semiconuc<strong>to</strong>r Bull 3X SOXL 1.03 111.7 -14.97 14.52 - - - - 14,109 13.8 - 0.01<br />

ProShares Ultra Gol UGL 0.95 283.4 16.80 14.42 58.28 41.39 - - - - - -<br />

PowerShares DB Gol Doule Lon T DGP 0.75 603.9 17.08 13.84 62.37 46.16 32.58 - - - 42.39 -<br />

ProShares Ultra QQQ QLD 0.95 768.9 1.34 13.53 36.90 121.20 0.73 - - - 50.16 -<br />

ProShares Ultra Technolo RO 0.95 127.6 -3.85 7.53 19.91 146.38 -1.23 - - - 50.71 -<br />

ProShares Ultra Basic aterials U 0.95 350.2 2.86 7.21 57.39 126.82 -18.87 - - - 69.50 0.06<br />

Direion Dail Technolo Bull 3 TH 2.25 199.7 -8.58 6.81 21.28 240.15 - - - - - -<br />

PowerShares DB Ariculture Doule Lon T DAG 0.75 132.7 -6.31 3.48 30.88 5.70 -11.66 - - - 54.58 -<br />

Direion Dail inancial Bull 3 AS 1.02 1,706.0 -13.25 1.35 13.02 -41.44 - - - - - -<br />

ProShares Ultra inancials UG 0.95 1,192.0 -7.93 1.31 18.04 -5.50 -38.42 - - - 66.08 0.07<br />

ProShares Ultra DJ-UBS Crue Oil UCO 0.95 322.5 2.37 0.62 -1.46 -7.38 - - - - - -<br />

Direion Dail merin arets Bull 3 DC 1.01 439.2 11.18 -3.17 24.29 206.32 - - - - - 0.50<br />

U.S. Equity<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Healthcare Proviers IH 0.47 323.3 9.94 22.47 11.47 35.44 9.02 6.44 10,654 13.4 26.73 0.16<br />

PowerShares S&P SmallCa Health Care PSCH 0.29 211.9 16.18 21.85 - - - - 1,382 21.3 - 0.22<br />

irst Trust Consumer Stales AlhaDX XG 0.70 135.5 13.22 20.14 19.75 27.47 12.31 - 10,855 14.9 18.60 0.87<br />

SPDR S&P Biotech XBI 0.35 646.8 20.25 19.28 17.60 0.36 8.40 11.25 3,063 - 26.20 -<br />

irst Trust Health Care AlhaDX XH 0.70 327.9 10.64 18.18 19.01 51.22 17.37 - 9,283 15.8 21.05 0.10<br />

PowerShares Dnamic Small Ca Growth PWT 0.39 163.1 10.48 17.61 27.31 17.50 5.26 2.10 1,447 24.6 24.65 -<br />

PowerShares S&P SmallCa ner PSC 0.29 123.8 0.33 17.17 - - - - 1,582 22.1 - 1.06<br />

iShares asa Biotechnolo IBB 0.48 1,654.9 15.50 17.06 14.84 15.17 11.52 8.56 5,858 19.4 22.63 0.47<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. eical Devices IHI 0.47 484.8 7.88 16.70 11.35 38.49 5.66 7.76 8,316 21.0 24.93 0.06<br />

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas loration & Prouction XOP 0.35 1,023.9 -0.78 16.03 28.58 40.16 -1.29 - 4,717 21.2 34.33 0.81<br />

iShares Cohen & Steers Realt aors IC 0.35 2,723.4 6.24 15.86 29.14 25.54 0.61 3.05 10,382 41.5 41.44 2.53<br />

Vanuar Health Care VHT 0.24 808.5 11.01 15.79 5.60 21.81 7.57 6.36 24,648 16.7 18.56 1.50<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Healthcare IH 0.48 687.7 10.89 15.34 4.13 20.96 6.83 5.98 34,666 17.3 18.31 1.41<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Pharmaceuticals IH 0.47 224.3 14.54 15.19 12.72 30.06 14.97 10.21 14,892 17.7 19.14 1.23<br />

Health Care Select SPDR XLV 0.20 3,841.5 11.02 15.14 3.32 19.49 6.10 5.43 46,513 17.1 17.92 1.70<br />

SPDR Dow Jones RIT RWR 0.25 1,593.0 5.76 14.51 28.03 28.24 2.03 3.49 7,513 41.6 40.36 2.71<br />

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas uiment & Services XS 0.35 524.6 -1.36 14.45 30.12 67.80 -3.68 - 3,945 22.5 39.70 0.73<br />

Yield<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

16 ETFR • July 2011


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

U.S. Equity (Continued)<br />

PXI 0.65 175.3 1.08 14.37 39.56 42.19 0.70 - 6,483 17.7 31.71 0.50<br />

0.48 122.4 5.80 14.08 30.81 20.73 5.74 - 5,526 42.1 32.63 2.74<br />

0.12 9,634.5 5.45 14.00 28.43 30.07 3.34 4.50 6,237 44.8 39.61 3.08<br />

0.35 696.3 7.52 13.99 34.84 60.81 15.62 12.96 3,864 19.3 27.32 0.07<br />

0.60 278.0 15.20 13.78 36.94 45.05 24.24 - 5,673 21.1 29.61 -<br />

0.60 615.5 -0.53 13.67 12.23 50.06 -8.18 - 12,715 17.7 37.39 0.22<br />

PowerShares Dynamic Oil & Gas Services PXJ 0.63 258.2 -0.84 13.65 29.18 52.86 -7.95 3.97 5,803 23.0 40.56 0.31<br />

0.63 102.2 -2.20 13.57 39.97 19.88 -3.09 8.71 8,408 17.3 32.22 0.46<br />

IJT 0.25 2,176.7 8.33 13.49 28.24 28.78 7.46 6.58 1,288 20.4 26.22 0.75<br />

0.47 648.2 -2.65 13.43 31.77 63.64 -4.52 6.07 15,059 23.8 39.85 0.39<br />

Pharmaceutical HOLDRS PPH - 464.2 10.96 13.41 1.67 20.47 6.85 5.48 89,527 18.4 17.29 -<br />

0.20 9,776.0 -1.51 13.34 21.81 21.81 -1.89 8.41 60,305 15.8 26.67 1.36<br />

0.48 1,087.0 -1.86 13.31 19.00 19.28 -2.33 8.37 65,240 15.2 25.53 1.16<br />

0.24 2,071.0 -1.57 13.28 21.05 25.54 -1.87 8.42 50,302 17.0 27.29 1.10<br />

0.70 183.3 -0.70 13.23 27.63 46.57 -4.52 - 11,994 17.9 38.20 0.48<br />

0.25 185.6 8.33 13.21 30.21 47.12 9.17 8.02 1,291 20.4 29.29 0.35<br />

0.47 3,720.5 4.54 13.17 26.60 30.46 1.69 2.87 7,718 24.3 38.04 3.17<br />

SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals XPH 0.35 268.2 13.36 13.06 22.47 27.60 18.68 - 7,394 17.6 20.04 0.69<br />

0.65 104.0 6.79 12.91 28.34 47.59 3.10 - 4,260 17.0 32.18 2.10<br />

0.48 558.6 -0.81 12.44 18.65 41.06 -3.67 9.01 17,025 23.4 33.24 0.41<br />

0.12 3,228.7 4.83 12.35 30.95 42.79 7.97 7.69 1,674 21.9 28.11 0.42<br />

0.25 3,524.3 5.54 12.26 30.44 41.11 7.30 8.65 4,108 20.4 25.28 0.53<br />

SPDR S&P Retail XRT 0.35 763.0 10.15 12.11 37.39 77.29 19.64 - 3,682 18.5 32.22 0.93<br />

PDP 0.70 453.1 5.40 12.08 26.59 28.03 -0.70 - 9,002 20.2 25.97 0.21<br />

RPV 0.35 120.3 4.18 12.01 22.53 53.44 6.72 3.69 10,265 13.7 37.19 1.12<br />

PBJ 0.63 265.1 10.27 11.90 29.97 10.95 8.18 8.10 7,641 18.9 17.16 1.02<br />

0.30 210.7 4.62 11.74 27.84 42.17 2.70 6.23 7,189 24.1 25.11 0.36<br />

VDC 0.24 743.8 10.04 11.35 14.62 16.55 7.94 9.29 42,023 15.7 15.11 2.33<br />

0.70 296.6 3.76 11.32 26.64 46.78 8.54 - 2,979 17.2 26.81 0.40<br />

IWP 0.25 3,536.3 4.98 11.30 26.03 46.47 4.30 6.36 7,816 21.0 25.82 0.79<br />

PBS 0.63 162.7 1.44 11.28 20.18 61.92 3.94 2.35 7,988 18.8 31.47 0.42<br />

0.70 616.2 6.69 11.27 32.01 57.11 11.22 - 7,520 17.9 33.44 0.40<br />

0.38 274.2 4.93 11.16 21.65 31.91 6.28 - 4,041 19.5 28.08 2.48<br />

0.25 11,203.2 4.30 11.14 26.26 37.52 5.73 6.73 3,662 20.4 25.14 0.85<br />

VOT 0.12 1,609.4 4.25 11.12 29.14 43.91 3.02 - 7,046 23.5 26.09 0.47<br />

IGV 0.48 655.6 6.18 11.11 24.64 47.53 7.86 11.46 12,916 26.6 24.62 -<br />

RPG 0.35 280.6 4.77 11.03 26.90 49.33 9.02 8.59 14,809 19.4 25.37 0.37<br />

0.60 499.2 4.78 10.99 17.83 50.31 4.73 - 12,844 14.5 27.93 4.52<br />

0.30 146.0 4.65 10.99 31.18 32.73 6.80 5.88 1,857 26.2 26.94 0.26<br />

iShares Russell 2000 Growth IWO 0.25 4,539.7 5.47 10.94 29.38 34.61 7.00 6.19 1,301 21.0 27.04 0.55<br />

0.60 162.9 6.47 10.87 26.79 48.69 10.60 - 4,326 14.4 29.24 0.56<br />

XLP 0.20 4,589.8 9.31 10.84 13.81 14.22 7.18 8.91 55,572 16.5 14.91 2.50<br />

- 492.8 0.43 10.79 18.52 61.55 4.95 2.38 22,047 12.7 29.42 -<br />

0.38 119.6 4.01 10.70 25.60 50.22 10.50 - 2,840 14.0 27.43 1.17<br />

VO 0.12 5,015.8 4.02 10.65 25.68 40.47 4.41 5.48 6,421 18.6 25.92 1.08<br />

VOX 0.24 420.8 9.82 10.62 19.52 29.45 4.61 6.52 20,820 17.3 21.20 2.63<br />

IJH 0.22 11,905.9 3.89 10.59 26.73 37.81 5.87 6.87 3,640 19.0 25.17 0.98<br />

0.38 389.5 6.62 10.57 21.44 25.57 4.77 - 22,427 16.6 24.86 3.22<br />

iShares Dow Jones Telecommunications 0.48 792.8 10.84 10.51 20.72 26.22 2.09 4.44 14,302 15.3 23.51 2.79<br />

0.70 186.8 3.54 10.47 18.69 40.43 5.83 - 15,036 12.4 27.88 1.15<br />

DHS 0.38 200.4 6.67 10.42 17.63 17.03 0.56 - 38,486 15.6 27.72 3.61<br />

Internet HOLDRS HHH - 124.8 5.32 10.32 24.35 82.50 11.96 8.48 44,978 31.5 30.37 -<br />

0.25 178.1 3.71 10.28 26.49 38.64 4.77 5.93 6,517 19.1 26.90 1.23<br />

IWR 0.20 6,555.3 4.11 10.17 25.31 40.70 4.17 5.70 7,531 18.1 26.05 1.42<br />

0.12 1,020.4 3.68 10.08 21.77 38.28 5.35 - 5,813 15.2 26.61 1.73<br />

0.16 1,429.8 3.48 10.05 27.62 37.90 5.78 6.14 2,329 19.3 26.85 0.91<br />

PWV 0.63 430.3 3.84 9.98 13.29 18.60 3.92 5.94 66,568 13.3 19.80 2.12<br />

0.60 100.3 4.14 9.91 20.78 58.82 6.67 7.28 15,898 19.5 27.47 0.47<br />

ITA 0.47 145.4 2.72 9.86 16.60 25.32 1.05 6.96 9,452 15.0 28.35 0.92<br />

0.48 366.7 8.12 9.86 18.99 23.32 7.72 8.04 36,968 15.8 18.30 2.01<br />

SCHA 0.13 554.1 3.33 9.83 28.62 - - - 1,585 17.7 - 0.95<br />

0.70 277.6 4.88 9.82 16.08 19.16 5.17 8.28 16,649 15.4 19.56 2.48<br />

VB 0.17 5,776.0 3.30 9.77 28.12 36.61 6.85 6.14 1,589 18.6 28.42 1.06<br />

RSP 0.40 3,341.6 3.33 9.76 21.39 44.59 5.33 5.23 14,133 16.9 26.86 1.30<br />

XSD 0.35 119.8 -1.63 9.74 15.71 98.99 8.93 4.55 3,148 17.8 33.25 0.66<br />

VPU 0.24 747.0 6.30 9.59 7.05 11.27 -1.53 5.46 9,732 13.9 16.46 3.56<br />

0.25 210.5 3.19 9.58 27.68 39.78 6.49 5.34 1,910 18.2 29.35 0.94<br />

0.40 6,378.6 6.25 9.50 17.79 11.15 1.78 0.87 10,814 14.9 23.10 3.24<br />

IJR 0.20 7,627.3 4.72 9.50 26.61 25.88 5.99 4.85 1,148 19.2 26.96 0.99<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Utilities IDU 0.48 527.0 6.06 9.48 7.21 12.31 -2.41 4.86 11,301 14.6 16.73 3.52<br />

Oil Services HOLDRS OIH - 2,912.9 -6.55 9.47 20.42 62.71 -9.12 1.23 26,914 24.4 38.66 -<br />

IWS 0.25 3,456.1 3.35 9.38 24.43 33.31 3.87 4.52 7,280 16.1 27.16 1.89<br />

0.18 1,409.1 4.13 9.33 14.25 17.17 1.64 - 54,004 14.9 22.30 2.55<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

Yield<br />

ETFR • July 2011 17


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

U.S. Equity (Continued)<br />

0.70 272.8 2.66 9.32 20.67 36.83 4.33 - 14,980 15.3 24.32 0.81<br />

0.54 155.5 2.54 9.32 23.21 51.87 8.03 - 3,218 16.2 28.75 0.52<br />

DIA 0.18 9,919.8 3.03 9.23 13.97 22.72 2.60 4.95 111,484 14.2 19.83 2.41<br />

0.45 192.1 5.87 9.20 16.20 13.38 4.01 0.91 41,794 14.5 25.88 3.43<br />

DTD 0.28 176.9 4.34 9.18 16.32 19.57 1.53 - 40,433 16.0 22.73 2.65<br />

0.28 762.8 4.20 9.15 14.98 17.31 0.67 - 63,809 15.6 21.94 2.52<br />

0.30 119.8 2.83 9.14 20.46 35.42 5.35 3.79 6,732 12.6 27.77 2.52<br />

IJJ 0.28 2,449.6 2.11 9.12 22.58 34.35 4.33 4.88 3,228 17.7 25.79 1.46<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services 0.48 217.4 4.27 9.11 23.26 32.63 7.76 5.01 23,854 18.3 23.61 0.96<br />

Utilities Select SPDR XLU 0.20 4,368.1 6.48 9.10 5.35 11.69 -2.44 5.03 15,059 14.1 16.76 3.86<br />

0.70 228.0 -0.72 9.07 26.64 66.79 7.31 - 7,679 15.7 29.69 0.02<br />

0.47 512.3 2.00 9.06 25.49 25.81 1.23 4.26 20,384 17.7 28.78 1.47<br />

0.70 117.6 0.89 9.02 28.27 14.19 -4.00 1.85 3,450 14.6 24.30 -<br />

0.95 115.0 2.17 8.96 14.17 - - - 30,340 15.1 - 0.64<br />

PWC 0.60 179.7 2.56 8.90 17.33 18.47 0.17 1.81 13,317 16.0 20.65 1.32<br />

XHB 0.35 864.2 6.07 8.88 17.40 27.60 0.01 -11.13 3,328 19.3 39.79 1.79<br />

PWJ 0.39 128.1 5.41 8.82 29.58 23.61 -0.08 5.91 7,245 25.9 24.10 0.25<br />

PIV 0.50 113.0 4.43 8.78 20.50 12.59 -5.02 -1.40 23,640 16.9 21.36 0.54<br />

PSCT 0.29 116.6 1.75 8.78 - - - - 1,018 21.1 - 0.19<br />

0.60 216.6 4.21 8.75 14.81 10.70 0.55 1.95 57,945 15.5 20.71 2.02<br />

iShares Russell 2000 0.28 16,059.7 3.33 8.65 26.90 28.53 5.81 4.66 1,158 17.8 27.22 1.05<br />

VTV 0.12 5,223.9 1.51 8.61 14.57 19.88 0.42 2.07 46,646 14.3 22.74 2.26<br />

0.70 637.9 3.74 8.59 28.28 59.45 4.16 - 6,061 16.6 36.96 1.48<br />

0.25 251.4 1.45 8.50 14.57 11.02 -1.73 0.64 77,451 12.2 20.72 2.38<br />

PXQ 0.63 171.1 -0.03 8.47 46.46 63.13 19.00 12.73 5,577 31.1 29.15 0.37<br />

Consumer Discretionary Select SPDR 0.20 2,382.1 2.94 8.45 27.49 40.52 9.61 5.35 27,331 18.1 27.20 1.37<br />

iShares Russell 3000 Growth IWZ 0.25 362.7 2.54 8.38 17.42 36.83 3.08 5.44 30,389 17.3 22.07 1.12<br />

XLI 0.20 4,202.7 2.10 8.37 27.85 22.00 1.32 4.24 34,566 17.4 28.83 1.69<br />

VCR 0.24 387.0 3.62 8.33 30.57 46.42 9.93 5.39 15,698 18.1 28.88 0.92<br />

SCHB 0.06 764.6 2.30 8.32 17.10 - - - 30,290 15.8 - 1.43<br />

VIG 0.18 6,477.5 3.26 8.30 14.76 19.56 3.63 4.85 42,457 16.1 18.48 1.93<br />

0.13 438.1 1.00 8.28 13.16 15.73 -0.53 - 72,946 14.1 22.47 2.22<br />

RWL 0.49 222.7 1.98 8.27 16.81 29.86 1.50 - 41,574 14.6 24.90 1.43<br />

PPA 0.66 101.3 1.26 8.24 10.59 23.04 -1.08 4.73 11,432 14.3 25.80 0.85<br />

iShares Russell 1000 Growth 0.20 13,945.4 2.15 8.21 16.48 36.73 2.83 5.38 40,916 17.1 21.80 1.23<br />

VTI 0.07 20,335.3 2.23 8.18 17.45 28.87 2.09 4.05 27,387 16.5 22.48 1.71<br />

iShares Russell 3000 IWV 0.21 3,424.0 2.16 8.18 16.82 28.29 1.65 3.64 28,288 15.9 22.72 1.54<br />

Telecom HOLDRS TTH - 127.8 8.95 8.16 16.38 7.05 -0.18 4.52 96,719 12.8 18.94 -<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. 0.20 631.9 2.09 8.11 16.50 28.25 1.63 3.81 32,913 15.7 22.24 1.54<br />

SCHV 0.13 240.1 1.87 8.11 14.86 - - - 55,559 13.5 - 2.23<br />

iShares Russell 1000 IWB 0.15 7,046.7 2.05 8.10 16.02 28.39 1.30 3.60 37,949 15.8 22.24 1.61<br />

0.65 111.1 2.51 8.06 33.03 14.91 0.86 - 4,810 19.2 28.06 0.64<br />

iShares S&P 1500 ISI 0.20 345.0 2.09 8.04 16.24 26.59 1.41 3.51 35,132 16.7 22.20 1.57<br />

VIS 0.24 568.1 1.60 8.02 27.32 22.05 0.58 3.82 19,751 19.0 29.60 1.21<br />

SCHX 0.08 620.0 2.08 8.01 15.92 - - - 41,823 15.6 - 1.51<br />

iShares Russell 1000 Value IWD 0.20 12,101.9 1.83 7.99 15.44 19.23 -0.45 1.56 35,155 14.6 23.21 1.90<br />

VV 0.12 3,232.8 2.03 7.98 15.93 27.36 1.38 3.86 41,311 16.3 21.99 1.69<br />

iShares S&P 500 Growth IVW 0.18 6,496.1 3.07 7.97 14.94 31.13 2.79 5.24 48,851 17.3 20.46 1.34<br />

0.50 142.7 -0.77 7.93 17.89 69.07 4.88 - 14,062 17.5 28.38 0.33<br />

iShares Russell 3000 Value IWW 0.26 338.9 2.01 7.88 15.76 19.66 -0.10 1.66 26,324 14.6 23.58 1.91<br />

0.70 138.8 1.92 7.87 23.62 28.83 1.95 - 14,595 20.5 23.01 0.49<br />

0.70 121.5 3.94 7.81 27.35 36.82 8.05 - 846 17.7 29.63 0.36<br />

0.47 714.6 7.84 7.72 26.74 18.93 2.16 4.67 10,447 23.4 27.88 1.07<br />

SPDR S&P 500 0.09 89,233.4 1.73 7.70 15.02 26.31 0.88 3.24 50,224 15.4 21.68 1.73<br />

iShares S&P 500 IVV 0.09 28,271.7 1.72 7.66 15.11 26.61 0.92 3.24 50,231 15.4 21.72 1.73<br />

VOO 0.06 1,301.8 1.73 7.60 - - - - 50,103 16.1 - -<br />

0.39 1,229.5 1.68 7.59 19.69 41.74 4.96 4.88 33,828 15.1 26.91 1.53<br />

SPDR 500 Growth 0.20 205.0 2.83 7.59 16.25 36.95 2.72 5.37 48,849 17.3 22.32 0.84<br />

0.60 775.3 3.99 7.58 36.72 79.07 13.79 - 9,227 31.1 28.08 0.10<br />

SCHG 0.13 335.5 2.15 7.57 16.85 - - - 31,070 18.6 - 0.66<br />

0.39 402.0 1.42 7.50 28.30 58.64 10.78 - 1,028 17.0 32.22 0.67<br />

PWB 0.61 194.9 3.32 7.45 13.74 34.61 -0.49 2.76 45,662 20.2 22.00 0.62<br />

VUG 0.12 5,933.5 2.62 7.43 17.23 36.08 2.48 5.52 36,511 19.0 21.84 1.10<br />

0.13 339.9 1.58 7.40 13.77 25.24 0.72 - 62,916 15.9 21.35 1.79<br />

iShares S&P 500 Value 0.18 4,599.4 0.35 7.38 14.97 20.90 -1.24 1.03 51,715 13.8 24.14 2.00<br />

0.20 198.1 1.76 7.34 17.34 27.89 1.61 3.78 31,008 15.8 22.81 1.49<br />

PowerShares QQQ QQQ 0.20 24,342.5 1.17 7.31 19.89 54.67 5.88 9.00 56,824 17.6 24.62 0.66<br />

0.35 5,873.0 3.25 7.25 16.42 19.04 5.72 4.00 13,051 16.5 23.30 3.15<br />

SPDR S&P 500 Value 0.20 176.4 0.22 7.13 15.53 17.03 -0.81 1.67 51,893 13.8 21.88 2.24<br />

0.20 317.8 2.00 7.08 12.68 21.09 1.37 4.08 66,555 16.0 21.37 1.71<br />

VBR 0.23 2,697.5 1.64 7.06 25.12 30.97 5.31 4.27 1,503 16.2 28.99 1.78<br />

SOXX 0.48 217.4 -3.95 7.06 14.32 74.92 1.98 0.47 13,780 13.2 32.65 1.05<br />

0.20 399.6 0.96 7.00 11.98 - - - 81,438 15.9 - 1.27<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

18 ETFR • July 2011<br />

Yield


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

U.S. Equity (Continued)<br />

0.30 203.2 1.57 7.00 25.80 40.06 8.83 5.69 1,830 14.0 30.32 1.80<br />

IWX 0.20 244.7 0.85 6.84 10.59 - - - 75,264 14.0 - 1.87<br />

0.30 167.8 2.29 6.84 17.79 45.16 4.85 6.17 14,960 18.5 25.01 0.63<br />

RWJ 0.54 141.4 1.54 6.82 25.96 46.53 11.05 - 1,035 17.5 32.93 0.39<br />

0.13 528.5 2.20 6.65 14.53 35.01 2.09 - 54,014 18.3 21.22 1.19<br />

0.50 170.0 1.42 6.62 13.89 30.38 1.68 3.34 31,222 17.1 21.94 1.40<br />

0.60 626.6 -0.47 6.50 21.71 79.71 7.68 9.11 20,206 17.6 28.86 0.36<br />

iShares S&P 100 0.20 2,985.4 0.61 6.33 12.48 22.12 0.09 2.81 105,814 14.5 20.66 1.84<br />

iShares Russell 2000 Value 0.41 4,614.8 1.23 6.25 24.68 20.59 4.46 2.84 1,022 15.1 28.34 1.64<br />

0.63 222.1 10.54 6.25 31.47 21.91 8.82 7.52 3,485 20.1 24.70 -<br />

Biotech HOLDRS BBH - 247.1 4.75 6.19 2.15 11.49 8.50 3.96 30,375 15.2 20.97 -<br />

0.60 147.0 1.99 6.19 25.58 20.02 3.97 1.99 479 17.7 28.88 0.35<br />

DSI 0.50 157.0 1.89 6.09 11.42 30.73 1.56 - 35,719 16.2 22.19 1.28<br />

0.38 142.9 1.72 5.73 26.97 48.71 11.55 - 689 13.8 30.87 1.12<br />

0.48 450.0 -0.61 5.71 11.98 62.42 3.86 7.43 43,756 16.4 25.44 0.48<br />

XLG 0.20 401.9 0.12 5.66 9.32 20.30 -0.46 2.33 144,813 14.4 19.67 1.84<br />

VGT 0.24 1,912.6 -0.78 5.64 12.78 61.89 4.60 7.36 41,260 16.7 25.25 0.56<br />

IWC 0.71 526.0 2.03 5.59 29.55 23.72 3.48 0.28 332 15.3 29.12 0.78<br />

VAW 0.24 719.2 2.28 5.48 24.46 51.44 -0.56 8.35 12,404 20.4 31.03 2.07<br />

IJS 0.25 1,853.2 1.46 5.48 24.70 22.36 4.43 3.21 1,024 18.1 28.44 1.14<br />

0.20 7,875.4 -0.06 5.38 11.41 51.25 2.99 6.60 74,838 15.4 23.10 1.26<br />

0.25 379.4 0.32 5.24 12.57 43.94 0.33 3.84 60,641 19.1 22.58 0.72<br />

0.25 134.4 1.47 5.19 24.62 36.93 5.97 4.78 1,025 18.1 29.03 1.69<br />

0.70 121.8 -1.35 4.86 19.25 33.55 3.93 - 7,065 11.5 30.90 1.21<br />

PowerShares Water Resources PHO 0.64 1,219.2 1.07 4.79 13.27 18.01 -3.76 3.62 2,400 19.3 28.98 0.51<br />

0.47 1,054.9 2.18 4.61 31.02 64.37 -0.18 9.39 14,735 14.6 34.75 1.15<br />

0.35 1,102.0 0.30 4.50 34.15 88.12 -5.46 - 3,455 22.2 44.77 0.57<br />

0.47 1,520.4 -1.56 4.45 12.42 63.79 4.40 7.39 57,836 15.8 25.09 0.42<br />

Retail HOLDRS RTH - 159.8 4.24 4.45 15.55 26.78 6.21 4.35 45,856 16.7 21.14 -<br />

0.48 274.2 -7.25 4.12 24.30 60.57 2.74 2.31 8,244 21.2 33.89 0.08<br />

XLB 0.20 2,648.7 1.05 3.81 20.56 48.11 -1.01 7.05 20,593 15.6 29.75 3.09<br />

0.38 249.3 1.57 3.71 27.05 22.15 5.39 - 877 17.2 30.82 3.26<br />

0.85 184.8 -3.19 3.55 - - - - - - - 5.09<br />

0.50 223.1 -2.40 3.42 15.31 70.44 4.04 6.86 38,543 17.3 27.52 0.44<br />

0.60 209.3 2.52 3.29 20.92 3.64 -0.97 -4.87 4,803 15.9 31.30 3.93<br />

0.85 132.2 -3.76 2.89 - - - - - - - 3.75<br />

iShares Dow Jones U.S. Home Construction ITB 0.47 500.0 1.44 2.75 10.43 23.24 -6.73 -19.65 2,626 22.5 42.28 0.59<br />

0.85 2,665.1 -3.97 2.28 34.53 - - - - - - 4.99<br />

0.85 1,113.9 -2.06 2.25 - - - - 7,312 27.0 - -<br />

0.48 520.0 -3.80 1.27 12.20 16.86 -9.18 -9.15 25,262 13.3 33.99 1.07<br />

0.27 662.7 -4.04 1.07 14.83 14.32 -8.44 -8.49 22,132 14.3 34.13 1.31<br />

0.35 208.3 -4.53 1.04 26.08 27.92 -1.43 -1.79 12,901 12.5 39.05 1.63<br />

0.48 164.9 -1.99 0.77 16.49 11.31 -5.19 - 3,190 7.4 20.27 9.57<br />

0.20 7,361.2 -5.75 -0.44 11.91 17.50 -11.86 -11.38 43,838 12.4 36.93 1.02<br />

0.35 579.6 -2.75 -1.83 20.65 -21.93 -5.44 - 1,322 19.6 33.10 1.40<br />

0.48 236.5 -6.13 -2.13 7.71 16.11 -11.96 -12.34 40,036 12.8 36.28 0.47<br />

IAT 0.48 144.1 -4.11 -2.79 20.25 -10.92 -8.96 -10.87 9,468 14.8 33.86 1.18<br />

0.35 1,480.6 -5.68 -3.53 23.07 -1.82 -10.96 -11.97 24,367 12.4 41.31 0.59<br />

- 105.0 -7.27 -3.91 12.62 3.29 -8.83 -9.26 58,953 11.5 37.79 -<br />

PBW 0.70 479.7 -11.25 -8.08 -5.55 27.61 -24.79 -14.31 1,306 13.4 39.30 -<br />

SCHH 0.13 122.2 5.91 - - - - - 7,511 41.6 - -<br />

International Equity<br />

0.54 209.8 2.81 17.66 -18.61 32.89 -6.39 4.83 37,530 - 38.02 4.99<br />

iShares S&P Global Healthcare IXJ 0.48 562.4 11.71 15.78 1.87 17.54 5.80 4.59 55,113 16.95 19.23 1.91<br />

0.54 463.1 4.58 14.85 -2.38 27.12 -5.49 1.75 42,903 13.04 33.22 2.37<br />

0.61 299.6 12.07 14.41 - - - - 6,883 14.81 - 0.95<br />

0.57 509.7 10.80 14.17 - - - - 1,543 22.15 - -<br />

0.55 108.1 16.67 14.12 - - - - 1,828 18.10 - -<br />

0.54 144.9 0.70 13.80 -14.20 21.97 -12.88 -5.20 29,072 12.32 36.79 1.71<br />

0.53 3,808.6 4.42 13.41 8.31 20.31 -4.04 5.80 47,041 13.83 34.51 1.06<br />

0.29 180.1 1.92 13.31 -7.75 25.23 -7.43 1.25 64,022 11.70 34.51 3.07<br />

0.53 585.0 10.35 13.08 14.48 22.05 4.88 7.38 63,415 14.77 24.90 1.15<br />

0.54 930.2 3.19 12.96 -3.00 26.41 -7.87 1.24 38,644 13.11 34.44 2.33<br />

DTH 0.58 140.7 3.68 11.85 -0.99 33.11 -4.82 - 40,749 12.01 30.23 3.95<br />

0.53 670.4 9.04 11.62 36.11 55.00 6.35 9.74 21,913 13.18 36.25 1.59<br />

0.6 1,448.3 3.71 11.61 3.74 28.90 -4.26 2.24 48,180 12.04 29.89 2.25<br />

0.14 3,656.1 4.15 11.37 6.05 31.33 -3.89 2.73 41,955 13.26 30.16 4.24<br />

DOO 0.58 160.4 5.20 11.27 5.70 33.13 -3.83 - 29,564 12.34 30.98 3.86<br />

DWX 0.45 532.1 7.06 11.13 7.87 62.12 0.10 - 9,930 10.14 35.72 4.19<br />

IXC 0.48 1,400.2 -1.89 10.60 11.79 24.71 -3.51 6.57 81,188 13.38 25.92 1.66<br />

IDV 0.5 544.0 4.07 10.51 11.84 60.56 0.14 - 17,608 12.20 33.56 3.63<br />

0.48 367.3 10.20 10.45 13.16 21.72 6.58 - 57,499 14.24 17.37 2.11<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

Yield<br />

ETFR • July 2011 19


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

International Equity (Continued)<br />

PowerShares Cleantech PZD 0.67 155.7 4.52 10.30 7.61 35.58 -7.07 - 4,191 20.71 34.27 0.02<br />

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real state RWO 0.5 311.4 4.99 10.21 24.01 32.04 -1.35 - 7,016 15.64 33.76 6.48<br />

irst Trust Dow Jones Global Select Diien GD 0.6 110.6 4.84 9.70 12.60 59.96 1.46 - 11,722 12.96 33.66 3.60<br />

Guenheim Canaian nery Income 0.7 229.6 -6.11 9.68 22.60 60.41 -7.10 - 6,371 27.63 39.41 2.34<br />

PowerShares Liste Priate uity PSP 0.6 481.0 3.16 9.40 25.90 30.22 -12.77 - 3,388 10.19 42.38 4.65<br />

aret Vec<strong>to</strong>rs Gamin BJ 0.65 140.2 8.07 9.26 37.88 36.20 -0.49 - 7,002 19.14 36.71 2.35<br />

iShares S&P Global Infrastructure IG 0.48 552.6 2.19 9.24 6.97 18.14 -4.03 - 13,866 14.02 25.72 3.40<br />

iShares SCI Inonesia IDO 0.61 191.1 15.58 9.11 - - - - 10,668 18.48 - 0.48<br />

WisomTree DA DW 0.48 473.8 2.84 8.96 5.19 27.12 -4.11 - 32,822 13.03 27.73 3.11<br />

WisomTree International LareCa Diien DOL 0.48 150.4 2.11 8.89 1.87 24.99 -4.61 - 64,079 12.59 27.96 3.22<br />

iShares SCI Russia Cae R<strong>US</strong> 0.65 128.9 -1.97 8.64 - - - - 59,741 11.08 - -<br />

Guenheim Timber CUT 0.7 228.4 0.40 8.48 18.19 50.20 2.39 - 3,764 12.40 39.36 2.65<br />

aret Vec<strong>to</strong>rs Inonesia IDX 0.6 545.6 15.28 8.34 41.77 - - - 9,526 17.15 - 0.88<br />

PowerShares Intl Diien Achieers PID 0.57 547.7 4.24 8.16 13.47 37.96 -2.57 3.42 27,109 12.92 28.52 2.81<br />

iShares SCI ousai TO 0.25 624.2 2.36 7.93 11.45 31.45 -1.05 - 43,798 15.32 24.32 1.91<br />

iShares S&P orth American atural Resources IG 0.48 2,312.0 -2.83 7.92 23.34 37.10 -2.28 7.58 35,869 16.90 29.84 1.42<br />

iShares SCI South orea W 0.61 5,068.6 13.69 7.88 29.58 71.72 4.81 8.87 19,336 - 42.36 0.67<br />

iShares S&P Global Telecommunications IXP 0.48 428.7 4.08 7.81 11.63 11.28 0.13 7.59 68,874 11.31 20.44 3.94<br />

iShares S&P Global 100 IOO 0.4 1,129.8 1.02 7.74 5.91 24.02 -1.32 2.76 109,958 12.20 23.78 2.04<br />

iShares SCI etherlans W 0.53 175.4 1.20 7.73 4.95 40.67 -5.62 3.21 20,458 13.67 33.57 1.42<br />

iShares SCI Unite inom WU 0.53 1,400.1 1.63 7.43 10.28 36.12 -3.03 1.31 56,258 13.36 27.22 2.27<br />

iShares S&P Global Inustrials XI 0.48 257.2 1.23 7.28 23.28 25.93 -0.60 - 27,785 17.21 29.04 1.38<br />

WisomTree International iCa Diien DI 0.58 152.3 2.34 7.21 11.31 33.99 -1.33 - 6,211 13.90 29.12 2.91<br />

Schwab International Small-Ca uity SCHC 0.35 176.4 4.31 7.13 - - - - 1,856 14.29 - 2.15<br />

PowerShares R De ts e-<strong>US</strong> Smi PX 0.75 288.3 0.24 7.13 6.81 36.02 -2.07 - 31,315 12.81 31.69 2.29<br />

Schwab International uity SCH 0.13 680.7 1.27 6.90 9.31 - - - 30,547 13.23 - 1.62<br />

iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary RXI 0.48 153.6 1.92 6.73 23.29 37.45 5.06 - 26,512 16.62 27.00 1.00<br />

iShares SCI A Value V 0.4 1,487.5 -1.24 6.68 4.59 28.28 -4.58 0.46 37,769 11.53 29.55 3.05<br />

Vanuar SCI A VA 0.12 6,864.9 0.74 6.67 8.33 27.52 -3.81 - 31,792 13.82 27.92 2.34<br />

WisomTree International Real state DRW 0.58 135.7 4.35 6.61 17.68 43.07 -3.01 - 6,004 9.38 32.61 8.88<br />

iShares SCI A A 0.35 40,597.0 0.83 6.60 8.25 26.88 -4.05 1.64 33,789 13.96 27.72 2.26<br />

Guenheim S&P Global Water CGW 0.65 249.7 6.24 6.50 15.02 31.54 -1.20 - 4,840 17.07 26.09 1.89<br />

SPDR S&P merin uroe GUR 0.59 278.8 0.38 6.38 15.70 78.98 -8.22 - 15,858 12.70 41.07 0.90<br />

Vanuar Total Worl S<strong>to</strong>c VT 0.25 986.4 1.92 6.38 13.07 32.66 - - 34,245 15.04 - 1.81<br />

SPDR Dow Jones International Real state RWX 0.59 2,240.4 3.65 6.34 21.83 36.34 -3.17 - 6,477 9.36 30.98 8.36<br />

aret Vec<strong>to</strong>rs RV Har <strong>Asset</strong>s Proucers HAP 0.59 253.6 -1.43 6.32 16.52 42.51 - - 33,897 15.51 - 0.76<br />

SPDR S&P China GXC 0.59 794.5 7.28 6.28 7.58 60.45 2.92 - 33,879 13.08 31.54 1.18<br />

iShares SCI A Growth G 0.4 1,469.7 2.82 6.20 13.11 24.15 -3.71 2.74 30,998 17.01 26.49 1.69<br />

Guenheim China All-Ca AO 0.7 100.7 7.33 6.19 8.81 - - - 30,898 13.35 - 0.98<br />

iShares SCI ACWI ACWI 0.35 1,882.7 1.89 6.17 12.82 32.31 -1.26 - 39,417 14.93 25.64 1.64<br />

iShares TS De Real state e-<strong>US</strong> IGL 0.48 426.0 3.11 6.13 14.57 42.86 -3.45 - 7,112 9.69 30.94 5.94<br />

iShares SCI Canaa WC 0.53 6,031.2 -2.29 6.13 19.80 53.07 -0.31 7.88 24,880 18.85 31.41 1.52<br />

iShares S&P merin arets Infrastructure I 0.75 149.0 8.80 6.07 18.66 - - - 9,234 15.31 - 2.48<br />

iShares SCI A Small Ca SCZ 0.4 1,661.7 2.99 6.06 21.51 42.78 0.01 - 1,632 14.98 29.99 2.70<br />

SPDR S&P Worl e-<strong>US</strong> GWL 0.34 147.3 1.07 5.66 11.29 28.63 -3.05 - 24,484 13.32 27.32 2.14<br />

Vanuar TS All-Worl e-<strong>US</strong> VU 0.22 7,691.6 1.88 5.51 11.80 37.61 -2.45 - 27,244 14.25 28.93 2.03<br />

iShares S&P Global Timber & orestry WOOD 0.48 285.6 -1.95 5.36 16.19 37.71 - - 4,936 13.23 - 2.35<br />

Guenheim International ulti-<strong>Asset</strong> Income HGI 0.89 101.9 2.42 5.32 12.14 50.10 -1.11 - 16,500 13.23 30.10 4.00<br />

Vanuar TS All-Worl e-<strong>US</strong> Small Ca VSS 0.33 1,038.8 4.31 5.31 25.59 - - - 1,481 14.47 - 2.08<br />

WisomTree merin arets uity Income D 0.63 1,591.6 8.23 5.29 24.67 58.07 8.15 - 10,562 12.59 28.26 3.13<br />

iShares TSXinhua China 25 XI 0.72 7,593.4 6.88 5.29 3.51 47.28 -2.07 14.86 88,716 11.23 31.39 1.38<br />

SPDR SCI ACWI e-<strong>US</strong> CWI 0.34 476.1 1.13 5.25 11.60 37.14 -2.06 - 33,393 12.93 28.70 2.21<br />

iShares SCI ACWI e <strong>US</strong> ACWX 0.35 974.8 1.20 5.06 10.44 36.28 -3.83 - 31,484 14.12 29.07 2.19<br />

iShares SCI Australia WA 0.53 3,396.9 2.34 5.03 15.35 67.90 1.23 9.80 34,356 15.55 34.70 3.12<br />

PowerShares DWA De t Technical Leaers PIZ 0.8 138.8 3.93 4.91 21.07 37.76 -2.68 - 11,456 16.26 30.72 0.41<br />

iShares SCI Thailan THD 0.62 697.3 9.77 4.89 56.76 81.30 13.57 - 6,441 - 37.04 2.32<br />

iShares SCI alaysia W 0.53 972.9 7.18 4.87 38.97 49.34 12.53 18.25 9,392 18.52 21.88 2.30<br />

SPDR DJ Global Titans DGT 0.5 153.1 -0.89 4.83 4.99 23.04 -3.33 0.71 59,536 13.42 21.77 2.13<br />

WisomTree International SmallCa Diien DLS 0.58 477.0 1.80 4.79 19.43 37.09 -1.28 - 1,198 13.26 29.23 2.59<br />

PowerShares Global Water PIO 0.75 380.2 4.70 4.55 11.24 39.02 -3.18 - 2,755 18.41 31.29 0.83<br />

iShares S&P Deeloe -<strong>US</strong>. Proerty WPS 0.48 156.2 1.99 4.48 18.13 37.27 -3.10 - 6,186 10.07 32.13 5.20<br />

iShares S&P Global Utilities JXI 0.48 260.2 -0.57 4.48 -1.79 6.22 -7.72 - 20,527 11.66 19.64 4.08<br />

iShares SCI Pacic e-Jaan PP 0.5 4,147.5 3.90 4.45 17.77 63.22 2.59 10.61 27,170 14.55 32.23 3.18<br />

PowerShares Global Clean nery PBD 0.75 196.8 0.55 4.30 -16.09 31.84 -20.58 - 2,153 15.61 40.13 0.13<br />

iShares SCI Austria WO 0.54 190.3 2.51 4.25 15.81 57.66 -12.64 -2.64 6,287 13.98 44.19 1.07<br />

Jefferies TRJ CRB Global Commoity uity CRBQ 0.65 157.3 -2.86 4.23 16.96 - - - 44,031 15.64 - 0.95<br />

Vanuar Global e-U.S. Real state VQI 0.35 178.1 3.91 4.01 - - - - 5,370 10.26 - -<br />

iShares S&P Global inancials IXG 0.48 277.2 -3.98 3.95 3.90 31.74 -10.41 -6.97 43,261 11.39 37.90 2.04<br />

aret Vec<strong>to</strong>rs Coal OL 0.59 692.6 3.17 3.92 31.34 144.65 -2.64 - 9,681 22.70 52.07 0.39<br />

PowerShares Global Ariculture PAGG 0.75 149.1 0.27 3.90 20.96 49.22 - - 14,692 16.64 - 0.92<br />

iShares S&P Asia 50 AIA 0.52 244.0 6.62 3.88 19.56 60.79 3.63 - 52,378 13.14 29.30 1.51<br />

SPDR S&P BRIC 40 BI 0.5 555.9 1.93 3.79 11.37 78.35 -2.78 - 96,340 11.29 33.23 1.49<br />

SPDR S&P International Small Ca GWX 0.59 975.6 1.04 3.76 24.96 38.30 0.75 - 1,198 14.10 29.19 2.29<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

20 ETFR • July 2011<br />

Yield


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

International Equity (Continued)<br />

0.4 171.1 -1.93 3.71 - - - - 49,462 12.34 - -<br />

0.56 5,219.8 -1.25 3.62 23.04 58.74 -3.16 - 15,985 16.74 33.84 0.60<br />

0.48 614.8 -2.15 2.86 10.44 52.44 0.43 4.71 59,667 15.72 26.10 0.65<br />

0.53 2,067.6 4.18 2.80 24.16 54.94 3.55 10.78 19,476 12.52 27.93 2.31<br />

0.65 174.0 -8.77 2.60 -28.50 16.88 -35.30 - 1,847 9.07 56.20 0.39<br />

0.6 156.8 4.48 2.60 18.17 82.55 3.51 - 17,518 20.89 36.67 0.67<br />

0.59 763.1 7.69 2.57 19.47 70.33 4.96 - 16,123 14.58 33.47 1.29<br />

0.53 1,928.1 8.81 2.53 24.51 67.83 4.99 14.52 15,077 12.99 33.76 2.99<br />

PGJ 0.7 414.4 0.29 2.52 11.31 63.14 -1.81 12.29 10,067 14.47 33.25 0.65<br />

0.9 299.8 8.74 2.26 25.11 57.65 -6.49 - 6,238 15.95 37.13 0.33<br />

RSX 0.62 3,186.2 -5.38 2.08 22.14 139.25 -11.83 - 34,923 12.12 49.44 0.48<br />

VWO 0.22 48,672.5 5.82 2.00 19.45 76.26 0.80 11.36 20,434 14.44 32.19 1.66<br />

0.85 205.1 9.19 1.93 - - - - 16,533 19.77 - -<br />

0.69 40,064.1 5.98 1.86 16.54 68.82 0.58 11.04 20,115 14.29 32.44 1.33<br />

GXG 0.78 174.7 6.78 1.84 51.44 - - - 5,436 26.64 - 0.62<br />

Global X China Consumer CHIQ 0.65 198.6 10.58 1.64 10.79 - - - 5,524 17.78 - 1.04<br />

0.48 808.2 0.24 1.62 19.92 60.38 -3.25 - 30,108 14.17 34.27 1.62<br />

PXH 0.85 547.9 1.83 1.32 13.26 67.02 1.38 - 25,120 12.74 32.82 1.01<br />

PXR 0.75 239.5 5.94 0.96 26.20 86.98 - - 7,228 16.16 - 0.83<br />

0.71 3,644.3 6.92 0.90 22.70 73.62 2.79 7.52 11,180 16.61 35.03 1.84<br />

0.59 225.4 4.38 0.83 18.76 72.29 1.13 - 18,460 13.12 32.53 1.43<br />

0.62 980.4 11.15 0.75 24.12 - - - 1,983 15.53 - 1.29<br />

0.53 1,694.2 2.03 0.71 27.95 53.82 1.28 13.34 19,247 17.30 34.15 0.87<br />

DGS 0.63 971.6 8.99 0.57 30.19 83.15 10.40 - 1,664 12.54 32.78 2.55<br />

AAXJ 0.69 2,055.4 6.25 0.30 16.22 68.40 - - 21,552 14.14 - 1.51<br />

0.64 186.9 6.83 0.24 - - - - 22,356 16.21 - 0.36<br />

0.25 453.9 3.87 -0.07 - - - - 22,734 12.76 - 0.80<br />

0.6 699.5 0.99 -0.50 10.70 86.11 -3.98 - 48,981 10.05 33.83 1.88<br />

0.69 1,099.0 1.33 -0.59 9.21 85.39 -4.46 - 31,685 12.77 35.87 1.74<br />

0.6 148.3 -5.07 -0.90 -19.20 7.12 -28.67 - 3,788 16.07 42.01 0.95<br />

VPL 0.14 1,656.3 -5.51 -1.60 15.50 20.35 -3.47 0.26 18,691 14.80 24.55 4.00<br />

0.59 210.4 2.16 -2.06 15.39 103.84 -0.68 - 28,626 9.18 37.03 2.58<br />

0.3 594.3 0.56 -2.20 10.98 65.54 -3.82 11.03 62,211 10.51 30.71 1.68<br />

CU 0.7 500.7 -1.48 -2.22 - - - - 9,975 14.63 - 0.82<br />

0.61 617.6 5.06 -2.41 36.91 51.23 7.98 10.83 14,904 15.63 35.86 2.50<br />

JSC 0.55 117.8 -8.90 -2.44 17.96 3.91 -0.71 - 944 14.67 21.73 1.67<br />

iShares S&P Latin America 40 0.5 2,464.6 0.31 -2.75 15.53 91.00 -2.11 17.30 39,436 - 34.34 2.23<br />

COPX 0.65 100.8 -0.82 -2.80 - - - - 6,925 11.82 - 0.48<br />

0.61 12,766.4 1.28 -2.81 7.69 121.50 -4.91 19.05 25,620 10.12 38.72 3.78<br />

HAO 0.75 327.4 4.26 -3.03 15.85 96.55 6.94 - 1,853 12.32 38.38 1.52<br />

0.65 614.1 6.23 -3.16 23.51 94.66 4.07 - 1,076 14.61 35.70 0.49<br />

0.61 919.8 10.19 -3.26 46.57 86.02 15.80 - 8,720 21.70 26.72 0.66<br />

SLX 0.55 236.7 -5.71 -4.17 19.65 112.78 -11.57 - 23,875 12.88 47.85 1.47<br />

0.59 144.2 4.77 -4.79 30.55 49.96 5.57 - 8,457 15.01 28.70 2.13<br />

GDXJ 0.54 2,215.0 -1.45 -4.89 66.53 - - - 1,321 - - 7.72<br />

SIL 0.65 488.2 -4.14 -5.06 - - - - 3,601 27.79 - 0.94<br />

0.58 236.5 -9.48 -5.14 17.40 0.94 -2.01 - 814 14.79 20.54 1.80<br />

0.78 114.0 1.37 -5.14 25.27 35.00 - - 8,110 16.91 - 1.14<br />

GDX 0.53 6,910.7 -2.81 -5.40 33.90 36.72 8.43 9.01 13,963 22.56 47.67 0.69<br />

0.61 120.2 0.86 -5.47 15.39 81.19 1.74 - 6,251 13.26 25.65 3.35<br />

DXJ 0.48 471.2 -11.01 -5.76 -1.77 1.19 -10.35 - 12,177 13.55 21.43 1.25<br />

0.54 7,272.9 -10.93 -5.87 13.61 3.14 -7.54 -4.89 15,199 14.99 22.47 1.38<br />

0.7 183.3 4.32 -6.10 33.88 54.34 - - 7,524 - - 0.54<br />

0.5 106.7 -11.36 -6.44 14.05 3.36 -8.20 -4.84 22,006 14.04 22.70 1.60<br />

TUR 0.61 610.6 4.65 -7.13 25.64 102.82 7.61 - 5,217 14.07 46.32 2.09<br />

Global X Lithium LIT 0.75 169.4 -7.94 -8.69 - - - - 1,954 - - -<br />

0.89 215.6 4.76 -9.41 24.45 - - - 20,608 20.73 - 0.44<br />

0.78 520.2 4.05 -10.03 16.29 79.68 -1.58 - 21,703 17.88 40.68 1.03<br />

0.57 177.9 -15.20 -10.45 16.59 17.33 -12.37 - 4,902 20.95 33.89 4.66<br />

0.88 1,322.6 4.34 -10.80 20.28 95.08 1.05 - 13,451 15.26 42.56 0.61<br />

0.89 746.6 4.61 -12.36 21.23 102.47 -0.07 - 16,117 7.92 44.25 -<br />

0.62 464.6 -7.39 -12.52 57.69 - - - 4,750 14.77 - 2.16<br />

0.76 285.2 -15.59 -21.81 4.10 - - - 1,914 13.30 - 1.65<br />

Global X Uranium URA 0.69 268.9 -35.57 -34.25 - - - - 1,313 - - -<br />

VX<strong>US</strong> 0.2 146.1 1.16 - - - - - 19,579 14.20 - -<br />

Yield<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

ETFR • July 2011 21


July 2011 U.S.-<strong>Listed</strong> <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Class</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong>-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Date</strong> <strong>Return</strong><br />

Issue No. 128<br />

Fund Name Ticker Exp Ratio <strong>Asset</strong>s 3-Mo YTD 2010 2009 3-Yr 5-Yr Mkt Cap P/E Std Dev<br />

U. S. Fixed Income<br />

BAB 0.29 703.2 6.95 8.86 9.38 - - - - - - 5.51<br />

0.25 196.3 4.76 7.13 -2.62 8.19 4.02 - - - 7.93 3.82<br />

0.65 1,838.0 3.79 7.03 16.00 38.50 4.48 - 27,387 - 39.63 6.85<br />

0.23 880.4 4.38 6.26 -0.51 9.99 4.96 - - - 6.61 3.45<br />

0.25 2,097.7 3.91 6.10 0.10 7.09 4.54 - - - 6.35 3.59<br />

0.48 7,899.1 3.18 5.63 13.83 38.70 5.08 - - - 32.82 7.19<br />

0.45 118.3 3.29 5.60 13.98 - - - - - - 5.73<br />

PHB 0.50 481.3 2.35 5.57 9.07 23.69 0.44 - - - 20.74 6.85<br />

0.40 7,390.8 2.15 5.55 14.20 37.65 8.25 - - - 21.60 8.29<br />

BLV 0.11 375.9 5.44 5.54 10.01 0.11 9.23 - - - 13.07 4.78<br />

PZA 0.28 497.5 4.33 5.45 -0.48 17.58 3.66 - - - 7.91 4.73<br />

VCLT 0.15 103.2 4.43 5.33 10.62 - - - - - - 5.23<br />

0.24 232.0 4.05 5.23 1.63 10.67 5.39 - - - 6.80 3.42<br />

PGX 0.50 1,442.7 3.52 5.11 11.56 19.69 -1.35 - - - 29.22 6.62<br />

0.50 8,986.7 1.78 4.95 11.96 28.86 7.71 - - - 19.24 7.79<br />

0.13 132.6 8.91 4.92 9.79 -35.63 6.73 - - - 28.92 4.24<br />

CWB 0.40 922.5 1.77 4.82 14.01 - - - - - - 3.81<br />

0.18 438.6 3.79 4.72 6.25 10.23 5.43 - - - 8.35 2.99<br />

Schwab U.S. TIPS SCHP 0.14 167.8 3.90 4.71 - - - - - - - -<br />

TIP 0.20 20,485.9 3.87 4.64 6.13 8.95 5.35 6.64 - - 8.71 3.15<br />

TLH 0.15 221.5 4.62 4.58 9.69 -9.08 7.86 - - - 12.30 3.41<br />

VCIT 0.15 517.0 2.98 4.47 9.97 - - - - - - 4.05<br />

LQD 0.15 13,775.7 3.25 4.41 9.33 8.58 8.19 6.94 - - 12.20 4.66<br />

BIV 0.11 1,994.2 3.66 4.38 9.14 3.93 8.12 - - - 7.71 3.86<br />

TLT 0.15 3,103.6 5.89 4.33 9.04 -21.75 6.56 7.46 - - 17.89 4.20<br />

LTPZ 0.20 291.1 4.49 4.09 8.66 - - - - - - 3.56<br />

0.15 3,167.0 4.24 4.00 9.36 -6.56 7.22 7.86 - - 8.37 3.01<br />

0.35 228.1 2.36 3.90 0.34 - - - - - - 6.08<br />

ITR 0.15 183.1 2.47 3.89 7.16 - - - - - - 3.45<br />

0.20 862.6 2.61 3.84 8.42 11.19 7.50 - - - 8.78 4.35<br />

STIP 0.20 144.1 2.14 3.78 - - - - - - - -<br />

PLW 0.25 295.3 4.53 3.68 8.80 -11.09 6.77 - - - 11.12 3.10<br />

CIU 0.20 3,464.0 2.21 3.32 6.83 12.79 7.03 - - - 7.03 3.96<br />

LAG 0.17 238.2 3.00 3.29 6.25 3.57 6.83 - - - 4.11 2.81<br />

0.15 1,432.5 2.96 3.14 6.31 -1.69 6.15 - - - 4.48 1.97<br />

0.20 109.6 2.68 2.96 5.71 3.25 6.03 - - - 5.98 3.11<br />

0.11 9,962.5 2.51 2.90 6.20 3.67 6.44 - - - 4.92 3.31<br />

STPZ 0.20 1,136.8 1.41 2.87 3.51 - - - - - - 2.28<br />

AGG 0.24 11,333.9 2.60 2.81 6.37 3.01 6.25 6.37 - - 5.39 3.38<br />

0.33 2,865.2 2.50 2.64 5.58 4.69 6.42 - - - 3.46 3.37<br />

GVI 0.20 590.5 2.10 2.48 5.46 1.99 5.60 - - - 5.09 2.78<br />

0.13 214.5 2.22 2.37 4.93 -1.55 5.08 - - - 3.70 1.97<br />

VCSH 0.15 1,567.0 1.51 2.27 5.27 - - - - - - 2.31<br />

SUB 0.25 418.0 1.84 2.27 0.36 4.24 - - - - - 1.25<br />

0.20 1,283.6 1.91 1.98 1.02 4.24 3.63 - - - 2.92 1.51<br />

AGZ 0.20 376.6 1.60 1.68 3.74 1.50 - - - - - 1.79<br />

BSV 0.11 6,416.6 1.47 1.61 3.89 1.55 4.51 - - - 3.73 2.10<br />

CSJ 0.20 8,170.0 0.70 1.41 2.88 7.17 4.43 - - - 4.12 2.21<br />

SCPB 0.12 359.9 0.65 1.35 2.80 - - - - - - 1.86<br />

Schwab Short-Term U. S. Treasury SCHO 0.12 110.7 0.75 0.80 - - - - - - - -<br />

VGSH 0.15 118.6 0.61 0.78 2.29 - - - - - - 0.72<br />

0.15 7,930.7 0.77 0.78 2.28 0.36 2.72 4.07 - - 1.40 0.96<br />

TUZ 0.09 107.2 0.70 0.49 2.43 - - - - - - 0.79<br />

PVI 0.25 431.2 0.07 0.17 0.29 1.00 1.19 - - - 0.53 0.43<br />

SHV 0.15 4,332.2 0.06 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.61 - - - 0.33 0.10<br />

BIL 0.13 940.1 0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.27 0.33 - - - 0.40 -<br />

PowerShares Senior Loan 0.83 157.1 - - - - - - - - - -<br />

International Fixed Income<br />

WIP 0.50 1,377.7 4.18 7.25 6.56 17.14 3.31 - - - 16.40 1.95<br />

BWZ 0.35 238.0 3.47 6.11 1.59 - - - - - - -<br />

BWX 0.50 1,497.8 4.33 5.90 3.82 5.44 5.08 - - - 12.38 0.59<br />

0.49 361.8 5.71 5.01 - - - - - - - -<br />

IGOV 0.35 233.5 3.15 5.00 1.59 - - - - - - 2.31<br />

ISHG 0.35 151.6 2.81 4.97 1.09 - - - - - - 1.18<br />

0.55 981.2 5.95 4.55 - - - - - - - -<br />

0.50 1,053.0 5.20 4.39 10.84 35.70 8.28 - - - 21.97 5.68<br />

0.60 2,714.5 4.78 3.63 10.86 15.50 8.43 - - - 19.46 4.99<br />

0.35 1,008.3 0.40 0.81 1.64 - - - - - - 0.88<br />

ALD 0.55 275.4 - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Yield<br />

Data as of 05/31/2011. Source: Morningstar. Exp Ratio is annual expense ratio. <strong>Asset</strong>s are net assets in $<strong>US</strong> millions. 3-Mo is 3-month <strong>to</strong>tal return. YTD is year-<strong>to</strong>-date. 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-year<br />

returns are annualized. Mkt Cap is geometric average market capitalization. P/E is price-<strong>to</strong>-earnings ratio. Std Dev is 3-year st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. Yield is 12-month. Includes all<br />

U.S.-listed <strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>and</strong> ETNs with assets over $100 million.<br />

22 ETFR • July 2011


VTWO<br />

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF<br />

VTWO has an expense ratio 36% lower than the industry average.*<br />

Every client’s portfolio could use some Vanguarding. ®<br />

The Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF is one option in a suite of seven Vanguard Russell<br />

Index <strong>ETFs</strong>. On average, our expense ratio costs are 1 / 3 lower than our competi<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

making it a great building block <strong>to</strong> help your clients reach their goals. Help them<br />

keep more of their returns with the Vanguard Russell ETF lineup.<br />

Take a closer look at advisors.vanguard.com/ VTWO<br />

800-453-3390<br />

All investments are subject <strong>to</strong> risk. Vanguard funds are not insured or guaranteed.<br />

Vanguard <strong>ETFs</strong> are not redeemable with an Applicant Fund other than in Creation Unit aggregations. Instead, inves<strong>to</strong>rs must buy or<br />

sell Vanguard ETF Shares in the secondary market with the assistance of a s<strong>to</strong>ckbroker. In doing so, the inves<strong>to</strong>r will incur brokerage<br />

commissions <strong>and</strong> may pay more than net asset value when buying <strong>and</strong> receive less than net asset value when selling.<br />

For more information about Vanguard ETF Shares, visit advisors.vanguard.com/VTWO, call 800-453-3390, or contact your broker<br />

<strong>to</strong> obtain a prospectus. Investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, <strong>and</strong> other important information are contained in the<br />

prospectus; read <strong>and</strong> consider it carefully before investing.<br />

The Russell 2000 Index <strong>and</strong> Russell ® are registered trademarks of Russell Investments <strong>and</strong> have been licensed for use <strong>by</strong> The Vanguard<br />

Group, Inc. The Product(s) are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted <strong>by</strong> Russell Investments <strong>and</strong> Russell Investments makes no<br />

representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Products.<br />

*Source: Morningstar as of 05/01/2011. Based on Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF expense ratio of 0.19% <strong>and</strong> 2011 ETF industry average<br />

expense ratio of 0.28% for similar funds.<br />

© 2011 The Vanguard Group, Inc. All rights reserved. U.S. Pat. No. 6,879,964 B2; 7,337,138. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distribu<strong>to</strong>r.


Bond Bubble?<br />

ProShares Short Fixed-Income etFs<br />

Short 20+ <strong>Year</strong> treaSUrY (TBF)<br />

UltraShort 20+ <strong>Year</strong> treaSUrY (TBT)<br />

Short 7-10 <strong>Year</strong> treaSUrY (TBX)<br />

UltraShort 7-10 <strong>Year</strong> treaSUrY (PST)<br />

UltraShort 3-7 <strong>Year</strong> treaSUrY (TBZ)<br />

UltraShort tIPS<br />

(TPS)<br />

Short hIgh YIeld<br />

(SJB)<br />

Short InveStment grade CorPorate (IGS)<br />

Think there’s a bubble in bonds? ProShares Short <strong>and</strong> UltraShort fixed-income <strong>ETFs</strong> seek inverse<br />

exposure <strong>to</strong> the one-day returns of U.S. Treasury <strong>and</strong> Corporate bond indexes, before fees <strong>and</strong><br />

expenses. Learn about these <strong>and</strong> the rest of ProShares’ innovative array of more than 120 alternative<br />

<strong>ETFs</strong> <strong>by</strong> calling 888.776.3894 or visiting proshares.com.<br />

Short ProShares seek returns that are -1x, -2x or -3x the return of an index or other benchmark (target) for a single day. Due <strong>to</strong> the compounding of<br />

daily returns, returns over periods other than one day will likely differ in amount <strong>and</strong> possibly direction from the target return for the same period.<br />

Inves<strong>to</strong>rs should moni<strong>to</strong>r their holdings consistent with their strategies, as frequently as daily. For more on correlation, leverage <strong>and</strong> other risks, please<br />

read the prospectus.<br />

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. ProShares are non-diversified <strong>and</strong> entail certain risks, including risk associated<br />

with the use of derivatives (swap agreements, futures contracts <strong>and</strong> similar instruments), imperfect benchmark correlation, leverage <strong>and</strong> market price<br />

variance, all of which can increase volatility <strong>and</strong> decrease performance. Bonds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. High yield bonds may involve<br />

greater levels of interest rate, credit, liquidity <strong>and</strong> valuation risk than for higher rated instruments. There is no guarantee any ProShares ETF will<br />

achieve its investment objective.<br />

Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges <strong>and</strong> expenses of ProShares before investing. This <strong>and</strong> other information can<br />

be found in their summary <strong>and</strong> full prospectuses. Read them carefully before investing. Obtain them from your financial adviser or broker/<br />

dealer representative or visit proshares.com.<br />

ProShares are distributed <strong>by</strong> SEI Investments Distribution Co., which is not affiliated with the advisor. ProShares Treasury <strong>ETFs</strong> are benchmarked <strong>to</strong> Barclays Capital indexes. Barclays<br />

Capital <strong>and</strong> Barclays Capital Inc. are trademarks of Barclays Capital Inc. ProShares Short High Yield <strong>and</strong> Short Investment Grade Corporate <strong>ETFs</strong> are benchmarked <strong>to</strong> iBoxx ® indexes. iBoxx<br />

is a registered trademark of Markit Indices Limited. All have been licensed for use <strong>by</strong> ProShares. ProShares have not been passed on <strong>by</strong> these entities or their affiliates as <strong>to</strong> their legality or<br />

suitability. ProShares are not sponsored, endorsed, sold, or promoted <strong>by</strong> these entities or their affiliates <strong>and</strong> they make no representation regarding the advisability of investing in ProShares.<br />

THESE ENTITIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES MAKE NO WARRANTIES AND BEAR NO LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PROSHARES. © 2011 PSA 2011-2148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!