14.02.2014 Views

View - CTU

View - CTU

View - CTU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pulpotomy (34.5%) had low success rates after -1 %-year follow-up, and the vast<br />

majority of the treatments failed due to pain.<br />

The final part of the dissertation focuses on possible factors shaping endodontic<br />

treatment quality among GDPs. A factor that could explain a sub-optimal treatment<br />

quality was a low rate of adoption of new technology (such as nickel-titanium<br />

instruments, apex locators and warm gutta-percha techniques). Also the rare use of<br />

rubber dam was noted (Study IV). Other factors influencing treatment outcome<br />

investigated amongst the GDPs were their endodontic knowledge, arid their skills and<br />

attitude to various endodontic topics based on 'self-assessments'. The creation of an<br />

aseptic operation field was regarded as the most difficult procedure, whereas root<br />

canal treatment was evaluated as relatively easy and was carried out rapidly (Study<br />

II). With respect to treatment outcome the GDPs seemed to put too much emphasis<br />

on factors associated with clinical symptoms, and too little emphasis on factors<br />

related to infection condition such as 'periapical status' and 'root canal infection'<br />

(Study V). Concomitantly, the GDPs regarded the technical root filling quality as<br />

important for the outcome of the treatment (Study V). The vast majority of the GDPs<br />

rarely assessed themselves as being at a non-satisfactory level with respect to 'root<br />

canal preparation procedure' and 'root filling procedure'. The only topic where the<br />

GDPs assessed themselves as being at a non-satisfactory level was 'microbiology'.<br />

Taken togethe<br />

they should do<br />

indicated from<br />

Clinical implit<br />

deep caries c,<br />

versus a dire<br />

investigated h<br />

performed at a<br />

The 'gap' bet1<br />

found in most J<br />

0<br />

0<br />

A highe.<br />

with a i<br />

contra/Ii<br />

A grea;<br />

mandat1<br />

treatme<br />

In the interplay between the dentist and the patient, the second most frequent<br />

malpractice claim category was endodontic treatment (Study VI). The most frequent<br />

reason for sub-optimal endodontic treatments was technical shortcomings and<br />

technical treatment complications. Male dentists and female patients were overrepresented<br />

in the material indicating a sex influence on aspects of the patient-dentist<br />

communication that are important for liability claims. No specific attention was paid to<br />

the importance of an aseptic technique during root canal treatment in the available<br />

reports from the complaint boards. Thus, the focus on endodontic infection control<br />

seems not yet entirely integrated between the education platforms found within the<br />

universities in Denmark.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!