A reproductive health needs assessment in Myanmar
A reproductive health needs assessment in Myanmar
A reproductive health needs assessment in Myanmar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Reproductive Health Needs Assessment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Myanmar</strong><br />
importance <strong>in</strong> <strong>Myanmar</strong> were <strong>in</strong>fertility, <strong>reproductive</strong> cancers and violence aga<strong>in</strong>st women.<br />
The discussions and presentations at this workshop provided <strong>in</strong>put to the preparation of<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es and the fieldwork.<br />
Development of guidel<strong>in</strong>es for field observations<br />
In view of the terms of reference, and feedback from the workshop, the team members<br />
developed guidel<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>in</strong>terviews and group discussions with men, women and young<br />
persons, community leaders, NGOs, and service providers at various levels and for<br />
observation of service provision.<br />
Site selection<br />
The fieldwork was conducted <strong>in</strong> six townships <strong>in</strong> three States/Divisions. These were selected<br />
to <strong>in</strong>clude a range of the more predom<strong>in</strong>ant socio-economic and cultural environments that<br />
exist <strong>in</strong> <strong>Myanmar</strong>. The <strong>assessment</strong> team does not suggest that these townships are<br />
representative of <strong>Myanmar</strong> on a national level, but by identify<strong>in</strong>g the similarities and<br />
differences between the selected sites, a sense of the current <strong>reproductive</strong> <strong>health</strong> <strong>needs</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Myanmar</strong> can be achieved. The six townships visited were: Mawlamy<strong>in</strong>e and Thaton (Mon<br />
State) Myittha and My<strong>in</strong>gyan (Mandalay Division); Taunggyi and Tachileik (Shan State).<br />
Figure 1 identifies these sites.<br />
Field <strong>assessment</strong><br />
The <strong>assessment</strong> team was split <strong>in</strong>to two sub-teams for the field <strong>assessment</strong>. In select<strong>in</strong>g each<br />
of the sub-teams, careful attention was paid to ensur<strong>in</strong>g the representativeness of a range of<br />
perspectives and expertise. Each sub-team visited one township <strong>in</strong> each of the<br />
States/Divisions.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> each township, a number of urban and rural service provision facilities were visited.<br />
These generally <strong>in</strong>cluded the township hospital, the MCH centre, and a number of rural<br />
<strong>health</strong> centres and sub-centres. Interviews, focus group discussions and observations were<br />
conducted at each of these sites. Interviews and focus group discussions were conducted<br />
with a range of service providers and community members. Public sector service providers<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong>cluded township medical staff, lady <strong>health</strong> visitors, midwives and voluntary<br />
<strong>health</strong> staff. Interviews were also conducted with private general practitioners and drug shop<br />
vendors. Community <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus group discussions covered as broad a crosssection<br />
of society as possible. Women and men were <strong>in</strong>terviewed across a range of different<br />
ages, of different marital status, and with different <strong>reproductive</strong> experiences. In order to elicit<br />
a broader community perspective, <strong>in</strong>terviews were conducted with community leaders, and<br />
leaders and members of a number of grass-roots organizations such as the MCWA, the<br />
MMA, the MRCS and the USDA.<br />
13