53. Volume 13- Number 1 - IP Australia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000 VOL 13 NO. 1 number of flowers medium to many. Flower pedicel: hairs or thorns few. Flower bud: shape broad ovate to ovate. Flower: type double borne both singly and in well spaced clusters, petal number many, colour peachy apricot, diameter large (mean 91.3mm), viewed from above irregularly rounded, upper and lower profile flat, fragrance medium. Sepal: extensions weak to medium (length mean 32.9mm). Petal: size large, colour of inner and outer side of midzone RHS 23C and 23D, colour of inner and outer side of margin RHS 26D and 27A, basal spot present on inner side (RHS 14B) and outer side (RHS 13B), size small to medium, reflexing of margin weak to medium, undulation of margin medium; stamen filament colour yellow; seed vessel size large, pitcher shaped; flowering habit almost continuous, time of beginning of flowering medium. (Note All RHS chart numbers refer to 1986 edition). Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent unnamed seedling x pollen parent ‘Pot-O-Gold’ in a planned breeding program at the applicant’s nursery in Knutsford, England. The seed parent was characterised by very fragrant, pale peachy pink flowers tinged with salmon and gold borne both singly and in clusters, prolific flowering, bushy and vigorous habit, and disease resistance. The pollen parent was characterised by medium fragrance, golden yellow flowers borne both singly and in clusters of several together, medium flowering and disease resistance. Hybridisation took place in Knutsford, England in 1987. Selection criteria: seedlings from the cross were grown and selection was made on the basis of medium fragrant, beautifully formed large peachy apricot flowers that are borne both singly and in well spaced clusters of several together, bushy and vigorous growth, and prolific flowering. Propagation: vegetative through many generations. Breeder: Gareth Fryer, Knutsford, Cheshire, England. Choice of Comparators ‘Sunauck’ A syn Barossa Dream A and ‘Just Joey’ were chosen as comparators as these are the most similar varieties of common knowledge based on flower colour. The parents were not considered for the trial as ‘Fryxotic’ syn Warm Wishes is clearly distinguishable from both parents on the basis of flower colour and growth habit as stated above. Comparative Trial Comparator(s): ‘Sunauck’ A syn Barossa Dream A , ‘Just Joey’. Location: Waterloo Corner, St Kilda, SA 1997/98 – 1999/2000. Conditions: virus indexed Dr Huey rootstock; plant spacing 1m by 0.9m; preripped, raised open beds, red loam soil; drip irrigated, complete fertiliser as required, chemical and mechanical weed control. Trial design: 10 plants of each variety arranged in two rows in unreplicated blocks. Measurements: twenty random samples from each variety. Prior Applications and Sales Country Year Current Status Name Applied UK 1992 Granted ‘Fryxotic’ Canada 1995 Granted ‘Fryxotic’ USA 1995 Granted ‘Fryxotic’ EU 1996 Granted ‘Fryxotic’ South Africa 1996 Granted ‘Fryxotic’ First sold in England in 1994. First Australian sale nil. Description: Peter Scholefield, Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd, Adelaide, SA. Table 36 Rosa varieties ‘Fryxotic’ syn *‘Sunauck’ A syn *‘Just Joey’ Warm Wishes Barossa Dream A ____________________________________________________ PLANT: GROWTH HABIT bushy broad bushy bushy ____________________________________________________ PLANT: HEIGHT medium short to medium medium ____________________________________________________ PLANT: WIDTH narrow to medium medium medium ____________________________________________________ YOUNG SHOOT: ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION medium to strong strong strong ____________________________________________________ YOUNG SHOOT: HUE OF ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION reddish brown purple reddish brown to purple to purple ____________________________________________________ THORN LENGTH (mm) mean 7.3 5.2 5.2 std deviation 1.6 1.6 1.1 LSD/sig 1.4 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ____________________________________________________ LEAF: SIZE medium to large medium large ____________________________________________________ LEAFLET: CROSS SECTION slight concave concave concave ____________________________________________________ TERMINAL LEAFLET: LENGTH (mm) mean 53.5 45.9 60.6 std deviation 6.2 7.2 6.1 LSD/sig 6.3 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ____________________________________________________ TERMINAL LEAFLET: WIDTH (mm) mean 34.9 30.2 40.6 std deviation 5.7 4.8 4.6 LSD/sig 4.9 ns P≤0.01 ____________________________________________________ FLOWERING SHOOT: NUMBERS OF FLOWERS medium to many many many ____________________________________________________ FLOWER BUD: SHAPE OF LONGITUDINAL SECTION broad ovate round ovate to ovate ____________________________________________________ PETAL: NUMBER many (54) many (80) many (44) ____________________________________________________ FLOWER: DIAMETER (mm) mean 91.3 97.3 104 std deviation 7.4 6.2 11.5 LSD/sig 8.3 ns P≤0.01 ____________________________________________________ FLOWER FRAGRANCE medium weak medium ____________________________________________________ 56
DESCRIPTIONS PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000 VOL 13 NO. 1 SEPAL: EXTENSIONS weak to weak weak medium ____________________________________________________ PETAL: SIZE large medium large ____________________________________________________ PETAL COLOUR (RHS, 1986) midzone outside 23D 10D 25D midzone inside 23C 27A 24C margin outside 27A 29D 27A margin inside 26D 29D 24B ____________________________________________________ PETAL: SIZE OF SPOT AT BASE OF INNER SIDE small to medium small medium ____________________________________________________ PETAL: SIZE OF SPOT AT BASE OF OUTER SIDE small medium small ____________________________________________________ COLOUR OF SPOT AT BASE (RHS, 1986) outside 13B 13C 14B inside 14B 12A 14B ____________________________________________________ PETAL: REFLEXING OF MARGIN weak to weak weak medium ____________________________________________________ SEED VESSEL: SIZE large medium large ____________________________________________________ HIP: SHAPE OF LONGITUDINAL SECTION pitcher funnel pitcher ____________________________________________________ TIME OF BEGINNING OF FLOWERING medium medium late ____________________________________________________ ‘Interlene’ Application No: 1998/263 Accepted: 29 Jan 1999. Applicant: Interplant B.V., Ne Leersum, The Netherlands. Agent: Grandiflora Nurseries Pty Ltd, Cranbourne, VIC. Characteristics (Table 37, Figure 12) Plant: habit narrow bushy, width medium. Young vegetative shoot: anthocyanin colouration very strong, purple. Stem thorns: present, lower surface concave. Leaves: size small, medium green, glossiness of upper side medium. Terminal leaflet: size medium, cross section slight concave, margin undulation absent, leaf base rounded. Flower pedicel: medium prickles. Flower bud: profile ovate. Flower: size small, double, flat upper and lower profile, sepal extensions medium, fragrance weak. Petals: size small, colour inner and outer side white (RHS 155D), basal spot absent on both sides, margin reflexing strong, undulation weak, stamen filament white. Seed vessel: small, pitcher shaped. Flowering: remontant cut flower rose. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent ‘unnamed seedling’ x pollen parent ‘unnamed seedling’ in a planned breeding program at the applicant’s nursery in Leersum, The Netherlands, in 1992. Both parents are proprietary breeding stock plants within breeder’s private collection. Selection criteria: selected on the basis of vigorous growth, high production, pure white colour. Propagation: by vegetative methods through many generations. Breeder: Mr. G. P Ilsink, Interplant B.V., Leersum, The Netherlands. Choice of Comparator ‘Tineke’ was initially considered as a comparator, however it was not finally included in the trial as it significantly differs from the candidate in stamen filament colour, which is yellow-green in ‘Tineke’ but white in ‘Interlene’. ‘Prebian’ A syn Bianca A was finally chosen as the sole comparator as it is in the opinion of the qualified person the most similar cut flower variety of common knowledge on the basis of flower colour. Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Prebian’ A syn Bianca A . Location: Cranbourne, VIC, Jul – Dec 1999. Conditions: plants grown in the soil within environmentally controlled glasshouse. Measurements: 20 random samples of each variety collected over a five month period. Prior Applications and Sales Country Year Current Status Name Applied The Netherlands 1996 Granted ‘Interlene’ Zimbabwe 1996 Applied ‘Interlene’ First sold in The Netherlands Jan 1997. Description: Phil Elliott, Grandiflora Nurseries Pty Ltd, Cranbourne, VIC. Table 37 Rosa varieties ‘Interlene’ *‘Prebian’ A syn Bianca A ____________________________________________________ PLANT HEIGHT narrow bushy narrow bushy ____________________________________________________ YOUNG SHOOT: ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION very strong weak ____________________________________________________ YOUNG SHOOT: HUE OF ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION purple bronze ____________________________________________________ THORN LENGTH (mm) mean 9.0 8.0 std deviation 1.23 1.01 LSD/sig 0.86 P≤0.01 ____________________________________________________ LEAF SIZE medium medium ____________________________________________________ LEAF COLOUR medium medium ____________________________________________________ TERMINAL LEAFLET LENGTH (mm) mean 69.5 68.0 std deviation 7.07 10.69 LSD/sig 6.95 ns ____________________________________________________ TERMINAL LEAFLET WIDTH (mm) mean 43.0 43.0 std deviation 5.87 5.03 LSD/sig 4.19 ns ____________________________________________________ 57
Page 1 and 2:
Plant Varieties Journal Quarter One
Page 3 and 4:
PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000 VOL 13
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
ACCEPTANCES PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20: ACCEPTANCES PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL
Page 21 and 22: DESCRIPTIONS PLANT VARIETIES JOURNA
Page 35 and 36: PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000 VOL 13
Page 69: DESCRIPTIONS PLANT VARIETIES JOURNA
Page 97 and 98: GRANTS PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
VOLUNTARY CEREAL REGISTRATION PLANT
Page 127:
ADVERTISE YOUR NEW VARIETY OR SERVI
show all

53. Volume 13- Number 1 - IP Australia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?