Network Coding and Wireless Physical-layer ... - Jacobs University
Network Coding and Wireless Physical-layer ... - Jacobs University
Network Coding and Wireless Physical-layer ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 8<br />
Summary, Conclusion, <strong>and</strong> Future<br />
Works<br />
8.1 Summary <strong>and</strong> Conclusion<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> key encoding has been presented in Chapter 7 as a means to protect security in<br />
the presence of vulnerable key symbols. The encoded output key is shorter than the input,<br />
thus sacrificing some key length for the sake of security. The counterpart of physical key<br />
encoding is Slepian-Wolf coding, which adds some redundancy to the quantized key such<br />
that legitimate receivers are protected against key mismatch due to channel estimation<br />
error.<br />
The relationship between physical key encoding <strong>and</strong> Slepian-Wolf coding in WPSG is<br />
similar to source coding <strong>and</strong> channel coding in a communication system in such a way that<br />
the latter exp<strong>and</strong>s what the former contracts. It is proved that optimality can be achieved<br />
when the source coding <strong>and</strong> the channel coding in a communication perform their tasks<br />
separately. It is yet to be proved whether such optimality holds with the separation of<br />
physical key encoding <strong>and</strong> Slepian-Wolf coding in WPSG.<br />
Just as channel coding has an unequal-error-protection (UEP) capability, physical key<br />
encoding has an unequal-security-protection (USP) capability. The concept of USP or<br />
scalable security has been previously discussed [22, 27, 32, 72], but it is more precisely<br />
110