20.03.2014 Views

The Art of War - Khamkoo

The Art of War - Khamkoo

The Art of War - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

heaviness <strong>of</strong> the arms (armor) and the annoyance <strong>of</strong> having to carry<br />

them; which inconveniences they overcame by accustoming the body to<br />

hardships and inducing it to endure hard work. And you know we do<br />

not suffer from things to which we are accustomed. And you must understand<br />

this, that the infantry must be able to fight with infantry and<br />

cavalry, and those are always useless who cannot sustain the (attacks <strong>of</strong><br />

the) cavalry, or if they are able to sustain them, none the less have fear <strong>of</strong><br />

infantry who are better armed and organized than they. Now if you will<br />

consider the German and the Roman infantry, you will find in the German<br />

((as we have said)) the aptitude <strong>of</strong> overcoming cavalry, but great<br />

disadvantages when fighting with an infantry organized as they are, and<br />

armed as the Roman. So that there will be this advantage <strong>of</strong> the one over<br />

the other, that the Romans could overcome both the infantry and the<br />

cavalry, and the Germans only the cavalry.<br />

COSIMO<br />

I would desire that you give some more particular example, so that we<br />

might understand it better.<br />

FABRIZIO<br />

I say thusly, that in many places in our histories you will find the Roman<br />

infantry to have defeated numberless cavalry, but you will never<br />

find them to have been defeated by men on foot because <strong>of</strong> some defect<br />

they may have had in their arms or because <strong>of</strong> some advantage the enemy<br />

had in his. For if their manner <strong>of</strong> arming had been defective, it was<br />

necessary for them to follow one <strong>of</strong> two courses: either when they found<br />

one who was better armed than they, not to go on further with the conquest,<br />

or that they take up the manner <strong>of</strong> the foreigner, and leave <strong>of</strong>f<br />

theirs: and since neither ensued, there follows, what can be easily conjectured,<br />

that this method <strong>of</strong> arming was better than that <strong>of</strong> anyone else.<br />

This has not yet occurred with the German infantry; for it has been seen<br />

that anytime they have had to combat with men on foot organized and<br />

as obstinate as they, they have made a bad showing; which results from<br />

the disadvantage they have in trying themselves against the arms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enemy. When Filippo Visconti, Duke <strong>of</strong> Milan, was assaulted by eighteen<br />

thousand Swiss, he sent against them Count Carmingnuola, who was his<br />

Captain at that time. This man with six thousand cavalry and a few infantry<br />

went to encounter them, and, coming hand to hand with them,<br />

was repulsed with very great damage. Whence Carmingnuola as a<br />

prudent man quickly recognized the power <strong>of</strong> the enemy arms, and how<br />

much they prevailed against cavalry, and the weakness <strong>of</strong> cavalry<br />

against those on foot so organized; and regrouping his forces, again went<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!