15.04.2014 Views

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annual Cutting Permits<br />

Under the terms of Article 72, paragraph 2 of Decree <strong>No</strong>. 2002-437, ACPs are delivered by<br />

the DDEFs before 15 December, after a mission to verify systematic inventories (verification<br />

of a minimum of 5% of the number of plots in the annual logging area). The purpose of the<br />

verification mission is to determine whether the inventories done by the company were<br />

accurate.<br />

In this specific case, frequent granting of ACPs after the legal deadline was seen.<br />

First, this situation involves companies’ late submission of the permit requests, after 15<br />

October (cf. Section 1.3.1). In such cases, MEF agents usually accept the application on the<br />

condition that they obtain the DGEF’s prior approval, with official statements of offence only<br />

rarely being issued.<br />

Second, it is appropriate to note that some DDEFs are constrained when conducting<br />

verification missions. Indeed, even though the financial cost of these missions is covered by<br />

the logging companies and can include logging site employees, the DDEFs’ insufficient<br />

human and/or logistical resources hinders their accomplishment in the two and a half months<br />

scheduled, particularly in areas with a large number of forest concessions.<br />

<strong>REM</strong> recommends that the Forest Administration:<br />

- Apply the legal and regulatory provisions by issuing an official statement of offence for<br />

“failure to follow logging rules” when an ACP request is submitted after the deadline<br />

without adequate reason.<br />

- Discuss the DDEFs’ difficulties to follow the legal timeframe for ACP allocation and<br />

assess the means needed to comply with the provisions (modifying the deadline /<br />

appropriate resources).<br />

Annual Cutting Permit Extension<br />

In regard to annual cutting permit extensions 78 , two law enforcement problems were<br />

observed:<br />

• Allocation after the legal deadline (2 January); and<br />

• Allocation for the entire annual felling area (plots already logged and not yet logged)<br />

instead of for only those plots not yet logged.<br />

For the first problem, it was noted that compliance with the legal deadline is perceived to be<br />

difficult by certain authorities. This was discussed during the Conference of Departmental<br />

Directors of Forest Economy in March 2008, following which recommendations were<br />

formulated that aimed to modify the scheduled allocation date of 2 January to 31 January at<br />

the latest, and redefine the notion of fulfilment of the ACP to include the hauling of felled<br />

timber. This aspect was discussed during a reading committee meeting where the MEF<br />

mentioned that the 2 January deadline was not realistic given difficulties in the field and<br />

78 Article 74 al 2 of decree n° 2002‐437 stipulating conditions of management and use of forests<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!