REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MPA and IPA allocation process for an FMU/FEU after reaching the Forestry Commission Legal text Pre award Process prior to reaching the Forestry Commission Art 161, décret Examination of accepted dossiers focusing on administrative, financial and professional competency of applicant Art 161 (2 et 3), décret Cancellation of permit Selection of successful candidate and runner up Forestry Commission Art 165, décret Art 166(1), decree Art 153, 166, 167, decree No Consultation of runner up Notification by letter of approved and rejected bidders Applicant confirms on schedule? Yes Opening of negotiations on terms of agreement and financial deposit 4 weeks to pay the deposit: 5 million if investments < 1 billion 1% of investments if > 5 billion Deposit reimbursable (50%/year) if clauses are respected The negotiations are between the DGEF, DDEF the sector concerned and candidates approved Art 169, decree Art 153, 154, 167, 170, decree Art 166(2), decree Confirmed on schedule? No New invitation to tender announced Yes Deposit reimbursed No signature No Completion of terms of agreement OK? Yes Terms of agreement between applicant and government signed Terms of agreement signed (MPA/IPA) after DGEF approval Publication of terms of agreement 52
Appendix 5: List of the Principal Observations from REM in Regard to Logging Companies (source: validated OIF reports, 1 st half of 2008) REPORT 01/OIF/REM 02/OIF/REM 03/OIF/REM 04/OIF/REM 05/OIF/REM 06/OIF/REM COMPANY SOFIA MAMBILI WOOD SICOFOR FORALAC CITB QUATOR Nouvelle TRABEC FMU/FEU Abala FMU Mambili FMU Cotovindou FEU Nkola FEU Nanga FEU Boubissi FEU Department Plateaux Cuvette Centre Kouilou and Pointe Noire Kouilou and Pointe Noire Kouilou and Pointe Noire Kouilou and Pointe Noire Mission November 2007 February 2008 March 2008 March 2008 March 2008 March 2008 SYSTEMATIC REMARKS Felling request submitted after deadline Poor keeping of field documents Missing documents (field, sawmill) Felling outside limits Felling timber without a permit ● 2006 ACP ● 2007 installation permit ● Additional 2007 ACP ● 2007 ACP 88 ● Various permits from 2005 to 2008 ● Field documents = poorly kept, volume report missing ● Waybills = handwritten, crossed-out passages ● Field documents = poorly kept, volume report missing ● Waybills = not used at the time of the mission ● Waybills = too full ●Waybills = poorly kept ● Poor keeping of field documents ●Poor keeping of waybills (inscription contradicting timber marks) - - ● Last field documents for 2007 AL 89 - ●sawmill lumber entry register 90 - 91 - 92 - - - 93 94 - - - 95 - - 96 - - ● Poor keeping of field documents (not up-todate at the time of the mission) ●Poor keeping of waybills 88 OSO No. 107 dated 02.10.06 for failure to submit the 2007 annual felling request before the regulatory deadline. 89 OSO No. 025 dated 06.04.07 issued by the DDEFK for fanciful declaration of annual felling counts. 90 OSO No. 070 dated 22.11.07 issued by the DDEFK for refusal to submit field documents and waybills. 91 OSO No. 082 dated 20.12.06 issued by the DDEFK and the DDEFPN for failure to update sawmill entry registers. 92 OSO No. 002 dated 12.01.07 for transportation of timber without an administrative permit. 93 OSO No. 039 dated 23.07.07 for felling outside the limits of the 2007 AFP. 94 OSO No. 007 dated 30.01.08 issued by the DDEFK for felling beyond the annual cutting permit limits. 95 OSO No. 03 dated 02.08.07 issued by the DDEFCu for unauthorised felling. 53
Page 1 and 2: Resource Extraction Monitoring Obse
Page 3 and 4: Acronyms ACP CNIAF DDEF DF DFAP DGE
Page 5 and 6: submission of requests by companies
Page 7 and 8: 1. RESULTS 1.1. Observations on For
Page 9 and 10: (Table 1). Given the 60/40 2 ratio,
Page 11 and 12: The results of this exercise are th
Page 13 and 14: 1.1.6. Implementation of Surveillan
Page 15 and 16: It should be noted that appendices
Page 17 and 18: development of the FMU concerned.
Page 19 and 20: For the next Forest Commission meet
Page 21 and 22: Despite the progress announced by t
Page 23 and 24: The final outcome of the discussion
Page 25 and 26: Figure 3 : Location of the Cotovind
Page 27 and 28: them pay fines in full. Similar rem
Page 29 and 30: linked to the fluctuations in the d
Page 31 and 32: - All official statements of offenc
Page 33 and 34: In regard to forest taxes, the 3% p
Page 35 and 36: weather fluctuations that prevent l
Page 37 and 38: Figure 6: Forest Concessions Covere
Page 39 and 40: Table 1: IM Mission Dates and Repor
Page 41 and 42: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The
Page 43 and 44: CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS B. Proc
Page 45 and 46: CONCLUSIONS Examination of the cons
Page 47 and 48: General Organisation of the OIF Pro
Page 49 and 50: MEF SERVICES MISSIONS Number Type o
Page 51: Annexe 4 : Processes of forest conc
Page 55 and 56: REPORT 01/OIF/REM 02/OIF/REM 03/OIF
Page 57 and 58: FOLLOW UP OF LEGAL CASES (DDEF) OBS
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 7: Summary of the Unfulfil
Page 61 and 62: Type of Tax Total Amount (FCFA) Amo
Page 63: Appendix 9: Export blockages issued

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?