15.04.2014 Views

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

The semester presented in this report revealed a strong political commitment by the<br />

government to improve forest and fauna resource management and exploitation practices.<br />

This commitment is also illustrated by the opening of negotiations on a Voluntary Partnership<br />

Agreement between the Republic of the <strong>Congo</strong> and the EU as part of the FLEGT process.<br />

Nevertheless, several areas of improvement concerning the Forest Administration were<br />

identified::<br />

- Some of the processes dealing with the definition or allocation of Forest Units showed<br />

irregularities and a considerable lack of transparency;<br />

- The number of law enforcement missions conducted by MEF during the first half of 2008<br />

reveals a coverage rate that is insufficient compared to the quarterly missions planned by<br />

the Forest Administration<br />

- This, combined with the non-dissuasive nature of fine amounts and their low recovery<br />

rate, creates a situation in which certain types of infractions become recurrent;<br />

- <strong>No</strong>t updating the litigation registers and delays in transmitting the necessary documents to<br />

the DDEF and the DGEF were commonly observed during <strong>REM</strong>’s field missions; and<br />

- The DDEFs’ difficulty in applying certain provisions on logging permit allocation is<br />

known to the Ministry. Recommendations have already been formulated on this subject,<br />

but to date no concrete measures have been adopted.<br />

In regard to logging companies’ compliance with the law and regulations, the reoccurrence of<br />

certain situations was revealed, particularly:<br />

- tardy submission of annual logging permit application dossiers;<br />

- poor keeping of field documents, as well as failure to mark stumps, logs and abutments,<br />

apparently linked to the lack of regular inspection by MEF;<br />

- non-payment of taxes and, more severe, non-payment of fines with arrears of several<br />

years; and<br />

- failure to fulfil contractual obligations on time.<br />

In addition, project implementation from 1 January to 31 June 2008 was marked by:<br />

- the conducting of only independent missions (no joint missions), in part because of<br />

difficulties in communicating mission schedules of the various services to <strong>REM</strong>; and<br />

- a delay at the start of the six months in holding reading committee meetings, delays due<br />

to several successive reading committee meetings being held to amend the same reports,<br />

and delays in obtaining certain documents<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!