REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor
REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor
REM Rapport Annuel No. 1 OIF Congo Brazzaville - Forests Monitor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
The semester presented in this report revealed a strong political commitment by the<br />
government to improve forest and fauna resource management and exploitation practices.<br />
This commitment is also illustrated by the opening of negotiations on a Voluntary Partnership<br />
Agreement between the Republic of the <strong>Congo</strong> and the EU as part of the FLEGT process.<br />
Nevertheless, several areas of improvement concerning the Forest Administration were<br />
identified::<br />
- Some of the processes dealing with the definition or allocation of Forest Units showed<br />
irregularities and a considerable lack of transparency;<br />
- The number of law enforcement missions conducted by MEF during the first half of 2008<br />
reveals a coverage rate that is insufficient compared to the quarterly missions planned by<br />
the Forest Administration<br />
- This, combined with the non-dissuasive nature of fine amounts and their low recovery<br />
rate, creates a situation in which certain types of infractions become recurrent;<br />
- <strong>No</strong>t updating the litigation registers and delays in transmitting the necessary documents to<br />
the DDEF and the DGEF were commonly observed during <strong>REM</strong>’s field missions; and<br />
- The DDEFs’ difficulty in applying certain provisions on logging permit allocation is<br />
known to the Ministry. Recommendations have already been formulated on this subject,<br />
but to date no concrete measures have been adopted.<br />
In regard to logging companies’ compliance with the law and regulations, the reoccurrence of<br />
certain situations was revealed, particularly:<br />
- tardy submission of annual logging permit application dossiers;<br />
- poor keeping of field documents, as well as failure to mark stumps, logs and abutments,<br />
apparently linked to the lack of regular inspection by MEF;<br />
- non-payment of taxes and, more severe, non-payment of fines with arrears of several<br />
years; and<br />
- failure to fulfil contractual obligations on time.<br />
In addition, project implementation from 1 January to 31 June 2008 was marked by:<br />
- the conducting of only independent missions (no joint missions), in part because of<br />
difficulties in communicating mission schedules of the various services to <strong>REM</strong>; and<br />
- a delay at the start of the six months in holding reading committee meetings, delays due<br />
to several successive reading committee meetings being held to amend the same reports,<br />
and delays in obtaining certain documents<br />
41