Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids
Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids
Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Recommendations</strong> on ensuring quality of care<br />
Recommendation 12<br />
Countries should ensure that the performance of all cadres<br />
of health workers can be assessed against clearly defined<br />
roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
Comment: Assessment provides the means to ensure that agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards for quality of<br />
care <strong>and</strong> for the recruitment, training <strong>and</strong> retention of health workers are met. Roles,<br />
competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards must be clearly defined <strong>and</strong> communicated so that the<br />
performance of health workers under the task shifting approach can be properly evaluated.<br />
However, achieving health outcomes is dependent on the contribution of many workers <strong>and</strong><br />
therefore any assessment process should be undertaken within the context of health-care<br />
teams.<br />
Summary of Findings<br />
Setting st<strong>and</strong>ards against which desired outcomes can be assessed is essential to the success<br />
of the task shifting approach. If quality of care is to be ensured, health workers must perform their<br />
tasks in a way that meets agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards or technical expectations. The assessment process<br />
provides the means by which to verify that st<strong>and</strong>ards are being delivered <strong>and</strong> maintained 145 .<br />
Performance st<strong>and</strong>ards have been shown to provide a way to monitor the quality <strong>and</strong> the<br />
effectiveness of care. Studies have also found that performance st<strong>and</strong>ards can help to create an<br />
environment supportive of continuous quality improvement 146 147 .<br />
Competency-based st<strong>and</strong>ards serve a different purpose. These provide health workers <strong>and</strong> their<br />
supervisors with a clear underst<strong>and</strong>ing of what indicators will be used to measure their job<br />
performance. Competency-based st<strong>and</strong>ards can also contribute to improving the technical<br />
quality of care delivery by individual health workers, health-care teams <strong>and</strong> health facilities.<br />
However, if such st<strong>and</strong>ards are to be effective, they must be fully communicated <strong>and</strong> promoted<br />
so that all parties know what is expected of them 148-150 .<br />
In general, assessment makes it possible to collect <strong>and</strong> compare data that will help to identify<br />
<strong>and</strong> then apply “best practices” in the delivery of health services 150 151 . Assessment also has the<br />
potential to create a work climate that motivates health workers <strong>and</strong> improves their performance.<br />
However, these outcomes are only likely to be achieved if assessment processes are constructive<br />
<strong>and</strong> are linked to recognition <strong>and</strong> career progression 152 .<br />
Advantages:<br />
• Assessment supports the delivery of agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> highlights the need to take<br />
corrective action if necessary. This may involve the redefinition of roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong><br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
• Well-defined roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards that are fully communicated make<br />
assessment an effective continuing quality improvement mechanism.<br />
Uncertainties:<br />
• Existing data collection <strong>and</strong> monitoring systems in resource-constrained countries are, in<br />
many cases, not geared toward tracking quality assurance indicators.<br />
33