19.04.2014 Views

Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids

Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids

Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines - unaids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Recommendations</strong> on ensuring quality of care<br />

Recommendation 12<br />

Countries should ensure that the performance of all cadres<br />

of health workers can be assessed against clearly defined<br />

roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Comment: Assessment provides the means to ensure that agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards for quality of<br />

care <strong>and</strong> for the recruitment, training <strong>and</strong> retention of health workers are met. Roles,<br />

competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards must be clearly defined <strong>and</strong> communicated so that the<br />

performance of health workers under the task shifting approach can be properly evaluated.<br />

However, achieving health outcomes is dependent on the contribution of many workers <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore any assessment process should be undertaken within the context of health-care<br />

teams.<br />

Summary of Findings<br />

Setting st<strong>and</strong>ards against which desired outcomes can be assessed is essential to the success<br />

of the task shifting approach. If quality of care is to be ensured, health workers must perform their<br />

tasks in a way that meets agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards or technical expectations. The assessment process<br />

provides the means by which to verify that st<strong>and</strong>ards are being delivered <strong>and</strong> maintained 145 .<br />

Performance st<strong>and</strong>ards have been shown to provide a way to monitor the quality <strong>and</strong> the<br />

effectiveness of care. Studies have also found that performance st<strong>and</strong>ards can help to create an<br />

environment supportive of continuous quality improvement 146 147 .<br />

Competency-based st<strong>and</strong>ards serve a different purpose. These provide health workers <strong>and</strong> their<br />

supervisors with a clear underst<strong>and</strong>ing of what indicators will be used to measure their job<br />

performance. Competency-based st<strong>and</strong>ards can also contribute to improving the technical<br />

quality of care delivery by individual health workers, health-care teams <strong>and</strong> health facilities.<br />

However, if such st<strong>and</strong>ards are to be effective, they must be fully communicated <strong>and</strong> promoted<br />

so that all parties know what is expected of them 148-150 .<br />

In general, assessment makes it possible to collect <strong>and</strong> compare data that will help to identify<br />

<strong>and</strong> then apply “best practices” in the delivery of health services 150 151 . Assessment also has the<br />

potential to create a work climate that motivates health workers <strong>and</strong> improves their performance.<br />

However, these outcomes are only likely to be achieved if assessment processes are constructive<br />

<strong>and</strong> are linked to recognition <strong>and</strong> career progression 152 .<br />

Advantages:<br />

• Assessment supports the delivery of agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> highlights the need to take<br />

corrective action if necessary. This may involve the redefinition of roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong><br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

• Well-defined roles, competency levels <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards that are fully communicated make<br />

assessment an effective continuing quality improvement mechanism.<br />

Uncertainties:<br />

• Existing data collection <strong>and</strong> monitoring systems in resource-constrained countries are, in<br />

many cases, not geared toward tracking quality assurance indicators.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!