23.04.2014 Views

International Financial Reporting Standards_guide.pdf

International Financial Reporting Standards_guide.pdf

International Financial Reporting Standards_guide.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 Chapter 1 Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of <strong>Financial</strong> Statements<br />

for imposing market discipline. For a risk-based approach to bank management and supervision<br />

to be effective, useful information must be provided to each key player: supervisors,<br />

current and prospective shareholders and bondholders, depositors and other creditors, correspondent<br />

and other banks, counterparties, and the general public. Left alone, markets may<br />

not generate sufficient levels of disclosure. Although market forces normally balance the<br />

marginal benefits and costs of disclosing additional information, the end result may not be<br />

what players really need.<br />

1.5.5 The public disclosure of information is predicated on the existence of quality accounting<br />

standards and adequate disclosure methodology. The process normally involves publication<br />

of relevant qualitative and quantitative information in annual financial reports, which<br />

are often supplemented by biannual or quarterly financial statements and other important<br />

information. Because the provision of information can be expensive, disclosure requirements<br />

should weigh the usefulness of information for the public against the costs of providing it.<br />

1.5.6 It is also important to time the introduction of information well. Disclosure of negative<br />

information to a public that is not sufficiently sophisticated to interpret it could damage an<br />

entity (especially if it is a financial institution). In situations where low-quality information<br />

is put forth or users are not deemed capable of properly interpreting what is disclosed, public<br />

requirements should be phased in carefully and tightened progressively. In the long run,<br />

a full-disclosure regime is beneficial, even if some immediate problems are experienced,<br />

because the cost to the financial system of not being transparent is ultimately higher than the<br />

cost of revealing information.<br />

1.5.7 The financial and capital market liberalization of the past decades brought increasing<br />

volatility to financial markets and, consequently, increased the information needed to ensure<br />

financial stability. With the advance of financial and capital market liberalization, pressure<br />

has increased to improve the usefulness of available financial sector information through the<br />

formulation of minimum disclosure requirements. These requirements address the quality<br />

and quantity of information that must be provided to market participants and the general<br />

public.<br />

1.5.8 Transparency and accountability are not ends in and of themselves; nor are they<br />

panaceas to solve all problems. They are designed to improve economic performance and the<br />

working of international financial markets by enhancing the quality of decision making and<br />

risk management among market participants. In particular, transparency does not change the<br />

nature of banking or the risks inherent in financial systems. Although it cannot prevent financial<br />

crises, transparency may moderate the responses of market participants to bad news by<br />

helping them to anticipate and assess negative information. In this way, transparency helps<br />

to mitigate panic and contagion.<br />

1.5.9 A dichotomy exists between transparency and confidentiality. The release of proprietary<br />

information may enable competitors to take advantage of a particular situation, a fact<br />

that often deters market participants from full disclosure. Similarly, monitoring bodies frequently<br />

obtain confidential information from financial institutions, which can have significant<br />

market implications. Under such circumstances, financial institutions may be reluctant<br />

to provide sensitive information without the guarantee of client confidentiality. However,<br />

both unilateral transparency and full disclosure contribute to a regime of transparency. If<br />

such a regime were to become the norm, it would ultimately benefit all market participants,<br />

even if in the short term it would create discomfort for individual entities.<br />

1.5.10 In the context of public disclosure, financial statements should be easy to interpret.<br />

Widely available and affordable financial information supports official and private monitor-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!