SUSTAINABILITY REPORT - Landcom
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT - Landcom
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT - Landcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CORPORATE<br />
INDICATORS<br />
CONTINUED<br />
IN JUNE 2004, LANDCOM SIGNED A CONTRACT<br />
WITH INTEGRAL ENERGY TO PURCHASE GREEN<br />
POWER FOR ITS HEAD OFFICE IN PARRAMATTA.<br />
GOOD PERFORMANCE WHERE<br />
A TARGET IS NOT APPLICABLE<br />
Materiality<br />
Respondents were asked to rate the adequacy of information<br />
provided in enabling them to make informed decisions. The<br />
majority of respondents rated the materiality of information<br />
as “average” to “very good”.<br />
On the whole, the report was deemed to be “the best<br />
around” and at the “high end” for the purpose of a reference<br />
document. <strong>Landcom</strong> was acknowledged to be a leader in<br />
sustainability and triple bottom line reporting within the<br />
property sector.<br />
The URS work revealed that the key strengths of the<br />
report were:<br />
– Clear presentation of objectives and rationale.<br />
– Inclusion of targets.<br />
– Practical and appropriate use of indicators (clear<br />
and transparent).<br />
– Forward thinking and strategic commitment to the<br />
triple bottom line.<br />
– Well presented and comprehensive.<br />
– High level of consultation with stakeholders to<br />
develop indicators.<br />
Key weaknesses of the report were:<br />
– Lack of absolute figures.<br />
– Not always a clear distinction as to which indicators apply<br />
to land or built product.<br />
– No reference to transport or access indicators.<br />
– Need for additional biodiversity and community<br />
development indicators.<br />
– Lack of information on land supply and addressing housing<br />
affordability issues.<br />
– Too much information in some instances.<br />
– Difficulty in measuring some indicators (as acknowledged<br />
by <strong>Landcom</strong>).<br />
INDICATOR 30 – ABORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This indicator monitors <strong>Landcom</strong>’s efforts in providing<br />
employment and training opportunities for people of<br />
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander background.<br />
TARGET<br />
<strong>Landcom</strong> is seeking to establish a cadetship program for<br />
tertiary students of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander<br />
background. The purpose of the cadetship is to support<br />
members of the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander<br />
communities by offering them a scholarship to finance their<br />
tertiary studies combining the skills gained from their studies<br />
with practical work experience offered by <strong>Landcom</strong>.<br />
RESULTS<br />
<strong>Landcom</strong> has been proactive in its attempts to recruit an<br />
Aboriginal cadet during the past year. Despite advertising the<br />
cadetship position on two occasions, <strong>Landcom</strong> was unable<br />
to find a suitable candidate in a property related field.<br />
<strong>Landcom</strong> intends to review the opportunity for recruiting<br />
an Aboriginal cadet during 2005.<br />
INDICATOR 31 – EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This indicator provides an assessment of the overall<br />
satisfaction of <strong>Landcom</strong>’s permanent and long-term contract<br />
employees. <strong>Landcom</strong> conducts regular staff surveys to<br />
measure the Corporation’s performance against many<br />
employee satisfaction indicators.<br />
TARGET<br />
<strong>Landcom</strong> aims to maintain a high level of employee<br />
satisfaction.<br />
RESULTS<br />
<strong>Landcom</strong> conducted a Staff Attitude Survey in June 2004.<br />
When asked: “Considering everything, <strong>Landcom</strong> is a good<br />
place to work”, the response was:<br />
– 83% agree.<br />
– 11% neither agree nor disagree.<br />
– 6% disagree.<br />
42