Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea ... - Naturvårdsverket
Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea ... - Naturvårdsverket
Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea ... - Naturvårdsverket
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY<br />
Report 5873 • <strong>Ecosystem</strong> <strong>services</strong> <strong>provided</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> and Skagerrak<br />
Economic Marine Information<br />
Cultural ecosystem <strong>services</strong><br />
C6: The legacy of <strong>the</strong> sea<br />
Definition<br />
The legacy of nature is a non-use benefit. The service refers to an appreciation of<br />
nature for ethical reasons (existence value), which is often accompanied <strong>by</strong> a willingness<br />
to preserve <strong>the</strong> intrinsic value of nature for future generations (bequest<br />
value). In this context, <strong>the</strong> legacy of nature is replaced <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> legacy of <strong>the</strong> sea,<br />
referring to all aspects of <strong>the</strong> coastal and marine environment.<br />
Extent of appreciation and importance to<br />
society<br />
The legacy of nature cannot be quantified, nor can <strong>the</strong> legacy of <strong>the</strong> sea. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
its importance to humans can be evaluated, even in monetary terms (24). The<br />
beneficiaries of this service are believed to be numerous. They are limited nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
to coastal residents, nor to recreational users or visitors to seaside communities.<br />
The legacy of <strong>the</strong> sea may be equally important to an inland resident who has never<br />
visited <strong>the</strong> coast. To many people, nature does not need to be generating measurable<br />
<strong>services</strong> or providing goods; it just needs to be, in order to deserve concern<br />
and good management. Take for example <strong>the</strong> harbour porpoise or <strong>the</strong> white-tailed<br />
sea eagle. The number of people that have seen <strong>the</strong>se animals is minimal, yet many<br />
of us are prepared to invest in <strong>the</strong>ir conservation, and many of us would even experience<br />
a sense of loss were <strong>the</strong>y to disappear. It would signal that our generation<br />
has failed to protect <strong>the</strong> legacy of sea for future generations. Although <strong>the</strong> ethical<br />
values responsible for our appreciation certain animals are typically considered less<br />
worth, <strong>the</strong>y may in fact constitute <strong>the</strong> foundation for our wish to maintain biodiversity<br />
and conserve our natural environment. Assurance that all components of nature<br />
will persist, for no o<strong>the</strong>r reasons than ethical, adds to <strong>the</strong> well-being of many people.<br />
The extent of appreciation and thus its importance are strictly individual. How<br />
this service is valued is never<strong>the</strong>less likely to vary with economic development and<br />
levels of welfare; <strong>the</strong> value of participation in <strong>the</strong> conservation of nature for ethical<br />
purposes is, after all, a luxury. If one is poor, <strong>the</strong> main incentive for conservation is<br />
likely to be related to nature’s capacity of producing food or generating income.<br />
Interaction with o<strong>the</strong>r ecosystem <strong>services</strong><br />
The more nature is degraded, <strong>the</strong> less value does this service provide. The extent to<br />
which individuals recognise this legacy of <strong>the</strong> sea is, however, strictly individual<br />
and <strong>the</strong> factors affecting it remain unknown. However, <strong>the</strong> appreciation of <strong>the</strong> sea<br />
159