Hosted by www.ijjo.org

Chapter 10 | The Determination Process
41 Ibid, Endnote 38, 2004.
42 IAS. Submission to the APCI: An Analysis of Home Office
Country Reports. August 2005.
51 Ibid, Endnote 21, para 8.7.
52 UNHCR. Refugee Children: Guidelines on Protection
and Care. 1997. P46.
43 A body established by s182 of the Nationality, Immigration
and Asylum Act 2002 as an independent body
to consider and make recommendations to the Secretary
of State for the Home Department about the
content of country information.
44 Amnesty International. Get It Right: How Home Office
Decision Making Fails Refugees. February 2004.
45 For example, see interview with Melissa Canavan,
Senior Case Worker, Refugee Legal Centre (2004).
46 For example, comments by Ken Sutton and Jeremy
Oppenheim at the November 2004 meeting of the
National Asylum Support Forum.
47 House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts.
Fourth Report of Session 2004–2005 HC 238.
48 Ibid, Endnote 47, para 25.
49 The Queen on the Application of Mlloja v. Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC
2833 (Admin).
50 Ibid, Endnote 21, para 8.6.
53 Ibid, Endnote 52, p 47.
54 Ibid, Endnote 5.
55 This is also a recommendation made by UNHCR in
London as a result of its Quality Initiative Project, in
which it reviewed 2% of all initial decisions made by
the IND between May 2004 and January 2005.
56 UNHCR. Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for
Determining Refugee Status.
57 Ibid, Endnote 5.
58 ILPA. Working with Children and Young People Subject
to Immigration Control: Guidelines for Best Practice.
November 2004.
Hosted by www.ijjo.org
125