Hosted by www.ijjo.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 13 | Appeals: Processes and Outcomes Basis Upon Which Appeals Were Allowed: May 2004 See footnotes on page 172 NUMBER ALLOWED COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN NUMBER HEARD Male Female Total REFUGEE CONVENTION/ECHR REASON Iraq 21 1 0 1 imputed political opinion Somalia 19 4 7 11 ethnic origin (10); religion (1) Afghanistan 12 1 0 1 imputed political opinion Iran 11 1 1 2 political opinion Serbia 10 7 1 0 1 ethnic origin Angola 4 1 0 1 human rights DRC 11 3 0 0 0 Vietnam 3 0 0 0 Algeria 2 1 0 1 political opinion Cameroon 2 0 0 0 Eritrea 2 1 0 1 imputed political opinion Ethiopia 2 0 0 0 Guinea 2 0 0 India 2 0 0 0 Liberia 2 0 1 1 social group (trafficked) Sierra Leone 2 0 0 0 Uganda 2 1 0 1 religion/political opinion Albania 1 0 0 0 Belarus 1 0 0 0 Bhutan 1 1 0 1 political opinion Burundi 1 0 0 0 Chad 1 0 0 0 Colombia 1 0 0 0 Côte d’Ivoire 1 0 0 0 Georgia 1 0 0 0 Nigeria 1 0 0 0 Pakistan 1 0 0 0 Rwanda 1 1 0 1 ethnic origin Stateless (Bidoon) 1 1 0 1 ethnic origin Turkey 1 1 0 1 political opinion Zimbabwe 1 0 0 0 Unknown 1 0 0 0 TOTALS 113 16 9 25 Hosted by www.ijjo.org 171
Basis Upon Which Appeals Were Allowed: October 2004 See footnotes below NUMBER ALLOWED COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN NUMBER HEARD Male Female Total REFUGEE CONVENTION/ECHR REASON SEEKING ASYLUM ALONE | UNITED KINGDOM 172 Afghanistan 15 0 0 0 Serbia 12 13 0 0 0 Iraq 8 0 0 0 Somalia 8 3 2 5 ethnic origin; human rights (1f) Ethiopia 7 0 0 0 Eritrea 4 2 0 2 ethnic origin (1); imputed political opinion (1) Turkey 4 1 0 1 imputed political opinion Guinea 3 0 0 0 Sri Lanka 3 0 0 0 China 2 0 0 0 DRC 13 2 0 1 1 imputed political opinion Iran 2 0 0 0 Sierra Leone 2 0 0 0 Sudan 2 0 0 0 Albania 1 0 0 0 Angola 1 0 0 0 Lebanon 1 0 0 0 Liberia 1 0 0 0 Nigeria 1 0 0 0 Pakistan 1 0 0 0 Vietnam 1 0 0 0 Zimbabwe 1 0 0 0 TOTALS 83 6 3 9 Footnotes for Preceding Charts: Basis Upon Which Appeals Were Allowed: February, May and October 2004 1 Serbia and Montenegro (including Kosovo). 2 Jehovah’s Witness. 3 Democratic Republic of Congo. 4 One parent from Ethiopia and one from Eritrea. 5 Young woman; trafficking the manifestation of persecution. 6 Member of Bakongo tribe. 7 Where family were political and he was perceived as being political. 8 FGM and forced marriage. 9 Persecution of Mungki sect. 10 Serbia and Montenegro (including Kosovo). 11 Democratic Republic of Congo. 12 Serbia and Montenegro (including Kosovo). 13 Democratic Republic of Congo. Hosted by www.ijjo.org
Page 1 and 2:
Unaccompanied and Separated Childre
Page 3 and 4:
ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jacqueline Bhabha
Page 5 and 6:
Manchester City Council; Sue Fisher
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Chapter 1 | 9 Chapter 5 |
Page 9 and 10:
SEEKING ASYLUM ALONE | UNITED KINGD
Page 11 and 12:
Arriving in the U.K. 6 The Immigrat
Page 13 and 14:
ers often believe that although a p
Page 15 and 16:
fear of certain groups in society t
Page 17 and 18:
that unaccompanied minor children f
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
It then added that “although chil
Page 23 and 24:
2004 it rose to 8.8%. This was at a
Page 25 and 26:
2.3 Countries of Origin Unaccompani
Page 27 and 28:
Recommendations ■ 1. If the U.K.
Page 29 and 30:
There was no comparable age differe
Page 31 and 32:
2.7 Private Fostering Arrangements
Page 33 and 34:
Endnotes 9 Statistics published by
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
unfounded, thus depriving this subs
Page 39 and 40:
Bill in Parliament which would have
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
of someone who might be an unaccomp
Page 45 and 46:
It is clear that the Rules are a po
Page 47 and 48:
subsequently abducted by their form
Page 49 and 50:
“G” was a 16-year-old Christian
Page 51 and 52:
■ 4. Article 4 of the European Co
Page 53 and 54:
17 A multi-agency task force establ
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
of the asylum determination process
Page 59 and 60:
as a group around the claimant laug
Page 61 and 62:
with as being hostile. Nor did they
Page 63 and 64:
purposes. 38 The Immigration and Na
Page 65 and 66:
or local authority social services
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
als from age disputed children deta
Page 71 and 72:
and February 2005 when 75% of those
Page 73 and 74:
accommodation which is separated fr
Page 75 and 76:
e safe to let the child go and live
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
case, that adult is advised to info
Page 81 and 82:
The official justification for thes
Page 83 and 84:
Asylum Support Team has a case load
Page 85 and 86:
days and a second review after thre
Page 87 and 88:
provides access to rehabilitation a
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
who the child must try to relate to
Page 93 and 94:
adult in their life to speak on the
Page 95 and 96:
8.3 Role of a Legal Guardian rights
Page 97 and 98:
asylum application and monitor the
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
do once I got to London. The pictur
Page 103 and 104:
Some social services departments do
Page 105 and 106:
■ 5. The screening interview shou
Page 107 and 108:
eturn to a country requiring servic
Page 109 and 110:
■ 6. The syllabus for the Accredi
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
this research believe that it is no
Page 115 and 116:
A recent White Paper 13 states that
Page 117 and 118:
an important and distinct role to p
Page 119 and 120:
for Determining Refugee Status. 30
Page 121 and 122: draws on a small number of other re
Page 123 and 124: ■ 3. UNHCR also states that the q
Page 125 and 126: SEEKING ASYLUM ALONE | UNITED KINGD
Page 131 and 132: contact the child via social servic
Page 133 and 134: It is not possible to ascertain the
Page 135 and 136: leave to remain if it was unlikely
Page 139 and 140: “Unaccompanied children are not g
Page 141 and 142: 5 IND. Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking
Page 147 and 148: until they turn 18, whichever is th
Page 151 and 152: “There are some exceptionally goo
Page 153 and 154: could have been allowed. In one of
Page 155 and 156: esisting removal to their countries
Page 157 and 158: ■ 3. The Law Society and the Lega
Page 159 and 160: determinations we analyzed this did
Page 161 and 162: 42 Interview with Laura Brownlees,
Page 165 and 166: should resolve this difficulty. The
Page 167 and 168: A number of legal representatives b
Page 169 and 170: Department at appeals by unaccompan
Page 171: Basis Upon Which Appeals Were Allow
Page 175 and 176: Recommendations 14 Immigration Rule
Page 179 and 180: concern the plethora of evidence of
Page 181 and 182: As a consequence of these restricti
Page 183 and 184: ■ ■ accommodate unaccompanied o
Page 185 and 186: that the vast majority of referrals
Page 187 and 188: ecause of long waiting lists and be
Page 189 and 190: which would have provided for a leg
Page 191 and 192: screening interview and do not real
Page 193 and 194: ■ 9.9 The interviewer should alwa
Page 195 and 196: excessive delay in reaching a decis
Page 199 and 200: children, or anyone who had been re
Page 201 and 202: appeal. The Asylum Policy Unit has
Page 203 and 204: and adjudicators rarely prevented t
Page 205 and 206: 22 Information provided by Ailish K
Page 207 and 208: A P P E N D I X 1 Glossary of Terms
Page 209 and 210: Bibliography Amnesty International.
Page 211 and 212: Immigration Advisory Service. Submi
Page 213 and 214: FOR MORE INFORMATION PHOTOGRAPHY CR
show all

Hosted by www.ijjo.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?