Hosted by www.ijjo.org
Hosted by www.ijjo.org
Hosted by www.ijjo.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C H A P T E R 1 3<br />
Appeals: Processes<br />
and Outcomes<br />
13.1 Best Practice When Hearing Appeals<br />
<strong>by</strong> Unaccompanied or Separated Children<br />
In accordance with the Chief Adjudicator’s Guidance children’s appeals are<br />
generally listed at the start of an adjudicator or immigration judge’s list to ensure<br />
that a child does not have to wait at court all day. 1 Some adjudicators and<br />
immigration judges explain the proceedings to children in some detail and<br />
otherwise make the actual proceedings more child friendly. Others do not.<br />
Adjudicators take a somewhat different approach to<br />
children than adults if you make a fuss about it. If you<br />
talk to the child as a child, the adjudicator will often pick<br />
up on it. They will say things like “there’s no reason to<br />
feel afraid in my court.” Other adjudicators say “Yes, you<br />
are a child but I am dismissing this appeal...” 2<br />
It is of note that the Chief Adjudicator is a woman.<br />
When she does a child’s appeal, she comes down and<br />
sits at the same level but she is unique in that respect. 3<br />
The Guidance also states that unaccompanied<br />
children should be legally represented. 4 Previously<br />
there was a difficulty in implementing this guidance if<br />
the unaccompanied child had been refused representation<br />
<strong>by</strong> the Legal Services Commission or his or her<br />
own legal representative on the basis that his or her<br />
case had insufficient merits to succeed. However, the<br />
recent decision <strong>by</strong> the Legal Services Commission to<br />
fund all appeals brought <strong>by</strong> unaccompanied children<br />
<strong>Hosted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>www</strong>.<strong>ijjo</strong>.<strong>org</strong><br />
163