June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Roundtable<br />
“PB’s approach to<br />
engaging many<br />
perspectives in<br />
developing solutions<br />
is a key aspect<br />
to promoting<br />
sustainability.”<br />
“It is my sense<br />
that most people<br />
simply don’t really<br />
understand what<br />
sustainability is.”<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
Michael Meyer<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
Evaluating the tradeoffs is tough to do without some common metric, especially<br />
when you’ve got different experts all talking different languages. Layer that on<br />
top of a citizenry, which is growing ever more skeptical of their government and it<br />
makes it tough to get things built. So PB’s approach to engaging many perspectives in<br />
developing solutions is a key aspect to promoting sustainability.<br />
Gary McVoy: PB is currently developing a tool called PRISM that will provide<br />
common, measurable metrics to better understand a project’s economic,<br />
environmental, and societal value.<br />
Moderator<br />
It would appear that designing construction infrastructure to meet sustainable guidelines<br />
would only be in society’s best interest. However, sustainable design remains a tough sell.<br />
Why?<br />
Michael Meyer<br />
It is my sense that most people simply don’t really understand what sustainability is;<br />
that there is a large percentage of the population who are viewing sustainability as<br />
a component of a liberal or “environmental” agenda; and finally many professionals<br />
have the perception that whenever you talk about sustainability, you are talking about<br />
adding expense to a project. Many professional groups and transportation officials<br />
balk at considering sustainability because they believe that sustainability means you<br />
are going to use scarce dollars to “sugar coat” existing projects to the detriment of<br />
project functionality. These are the reasons why the sustainability bandwagon is not<br />
one that a lot of people have jumped on.<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
There is serious skepticism about anything promoted as being in “society’s interest.”<br />
The whole environmental movement was basically a negative reaction to things that<br />
engineers have been linked with over time, like interstates going directly through<br />
communities, rivers that caught fire, etc. Who wants to spend very scarce money on<br />
more projects that lead to failure? So we need to get more people to believe what we<br />
have to say about costs and benefits of a project which analysis can show.<br />
Gary McVoy<br />
I should add that it would be wise for professionals to integrate asset management<br />
into the sustainability discussion.<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
I agree. And we should use language that connects to the politicians. In Canada,<br />
the politicians had made “deficit” a dirty word. So we started talking about the<br />
“infrastructure deficit.” That has led to the asset management kind of thinking that’s<br />
going on.<br />
Moderator<br />
I’m hearing that there is the need to build a belief in the predictions presented by the PBs of the<br />
world. There’s a need for contributing to the education in a rational, pragmatic or unbiased<br />
way. How do you build trust that the predictions made by a PB represent an unbiased<br />
presentation of facts in a fractured, agenda-driven society?<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
A lot of infrastructure is fundamental to the society as we know it and yet it’s hidden;<br />
people don’t realize its benefits and they take it for granted. I would say that people<br />
EFR Discourse on the Global Sustainability Initiative | 3