June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Roundtable<br />
“It’s going to take a<br />
little while before the<br />
public sector in the<br />
infrastructure space<br />
starts to realize that<br />
they could achieve the<br />
same benefits [as the<br />
private sector].”<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
what they’re doing about climate change. That wasn’t a government initiative at all<br />
that has motivated public companies to start doing something about it.<br />
There are also private sector success stories that have been pretty remarkable. DuPont<br />
talks about the hundreds of millions of dollars they’ve saved because of sustainability<br />
measures. GE talks about the business success of their Ecomagination business.<br />
Interface Carpets has grown remarkably and changed the entire industry. So the<br />
private sector is starting to prove the triple bottom line benefits. It’s going to take a<br />
little while before the public sector in the infrastructure space starts to realize that<br />
they could achieve the same benefits.<br />
Gary McVoy<br />
It’s that alignment of the market with our long-term interests that we need. If we can<br />
help the markets send the right signals it would be huge. I think some companies are<br />
leading the way because they have a longer perspective than our election cycles.<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
That’s a good point. Shifting a longer-term perspective to the election process is a<br />
critical point.<br />
Gary McVoy<br />
If you start the conversation with dollars and cents, it leads to further discussion<br />
where the pieces can come together. And by dollars, I mean the net present values, it’s<br />
not just what gets spent today.<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
The net present value idea is a complex concept for most people. There’s a discount<br />
value on anything said about the future, and it’s a really high discount rate. That’s<br />
because nobody wants to believe the true cost.<br />
Moderator<br />
In today’s environment, what’s hindering the growth of sustainability? Is current federal<br />
legislation, including the NEPA process, adequate to support growth of sustainable<br />
transportation? Is there legislation on the horizon that’ll better promote sustainability?<br />
Peter Halsall<br />
Let’s look at British government carbon regulations for example. They have a really<br />
clear message to the market. A firm’s cost for carbon in the UK is therefore significant.<br />
And that regulatory regime is starting to appear around the world and, even if a<br />
company is operating in a market where it doesn’t exist, they will be operating in<br />
markets where it does, and it will change their operational practices.<br />
Michael Meyer<br />
I agree that the most effective way of fostering sustainability is through market<br />
mechanisms, such as carbon pricing. My suspicion, however, is that it is going to<br />
take some time in the U.S. before we ever see any significant form of carbon pricing. I<br />
have no doubt that pricing—in whatever form but certainly on carbon—would have<br />
a long-term effect in terms of decisions and product selection. However, I do not<br />
foresee in the near future any national legislation that causes this to happen. We have<br />
the USDOT’s Livable Communities initiative, which this administration has been<br />
pushing for some time, but this is not sustainability per se although it represents a<br />
strong element of sustainability.<br />
EFR Discourse on the Global Sustainability Initiative | 5