16.05.2014 Views

June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff

June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff

June 2011 - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Roundtable<br />

“It’s going to take a<br />

little while before the<br />

public sector in the<br />

infrastructure space<br />

starts to realize that<br />

they could achieve the<br />

same benefits [as the<br />

private sector].”<br />

Peter Halsall<br />

what they’re doing about climate change. That wasn’t a government initiative at all<br />

that has motivated public companies to start doing something about it.<br />

There are also private sector success stories that have been pretty remarkable. DuPont<br />

talks about the hundreds of millions of dollars they’ve saved because of sustainability<br />

measures. GE talks about the business success of their Ecomagination business.<br />

Interface Carpets has grown remarkably and changed the entire industry. So the<br />

private sector is starting to prove the triple bottom line benefits. It’s going to take a<br />

little while before the public sector in the infrastructure space starts to realize that<br />

they could achieve the same benefits.<br />

Gary McVoy<br />

It’s that alignment of the market with our long-term interests that we need. If we can<br />

help the markets send the right signals it would be huge. I think some companies are<br />

leading the way because they have a longer perspective than our election cycles.<br />

Peter Halsall<br />

That’s a good point. Shifting a longer-term perspective to the election process is a<br />

critical point.<br />

Gary McVoy<br />

If you start the conversation with dollars and cents, it leads to further discussion<br />

where the pieces can come together. And by dollars, I mean the net present values, it’s<br />

not just what gets spent today.<br />

Peter Halsall<br />

The net present value idea is a complex concept for most people. There’s a discount<br />

value on anything said about the future, and it’s a really high discount rate. That’s<br />

because nobody wants to believe the true cost.<br />

Moderator<br />

In today’s environment, what’s hindering the growth of sustainability? Is current federal<br />

legislation, including the NEPA process, adequate to support growth of sustainable<br />

transportation? Is there legislation on the horizon that’ll better promote sustainability?<br />

Peter Halsall<br />

Let’s look at British government carbon regulations for example. They have a really<br />

clear message to the market. A firm’s cost for carbon in the UK is therefore significant.<br />

And that regulatory regime is starting to appear around the world and, even if a<br />

company is operating in a market where it doesn’t exist, they will be operating in<br />

markets where it does, and it will change their operational practices.<br />

Michael Meyer<br />

I agree that the most effective way of fostering sustainability is through market<br />

mechanisms, such as carbon pricing. My suspicion, however, is that it is going to<br />

take some time in the U.S. before we ever see any significant form of carbon pricing. I<br />

have no doubt that pricing—in whatever form but certainly on carbon—would have<br />

a long-term effect in terms of decisions and product selection. However, I do not<br />

foresee in the near future any national legislation that causes this to happen. We have<br />

the USDOT’s Livable Communities initiative, which this administration has been<br />

pushing for some time, but this is not sustainability per se although it represents a<br />

strong element of sustainability.<br />

EFR Discourse on the Global Sustainability Initiative | 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!