04.06.2014 Views

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

compelled to assist them because <strong>of</strong> their commitments to the MDGs.<br />

Calling attention to the issue <strong>of</strong> maternal death as a human rights<br />

issue gives impetus to international efforts to help states meet their duty to<br />

provide pregnant women with maternal health care. A recent example<br />

illustrates this point. In April 2010, the British medical journal Lancet<br />

published a paper that found the number <strong>of</strong> women who die in pregnancy or<br />

childbirth had dropped by more than 35% over 28 years. 151 Lancet’s editor,<br />

Dr. Richard Horton, wrote in an accompanying comment “that he was<br />

pressured to delay publishing the report because <strong>of</strong> the potential damage to<br />

maternal advocacy campaigns.” 152 While the Lancet article found that<br />

maternal deaths had fallen to about 343,000 in 2008, another report issued<br />

only days later by a global alliance hosted by the World Health Organization<br />

“claimed progress in maternal health was at a standstill” and that up to<br />

500,000 women still die in childbirth every year. 153 The WHO alliance<br />

findings did not explain where their data came from, but in the same report<br />

U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials claimed they needed $20 billion every year to “save women and<br />

children in developing countries.” 154 Paradoxically, good news can be bad<br />

news when it comes to motivating states to address human rights issues; “the<br />

more people who are dying, the more money U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials can raise, making<br />

some experts not keen to announce success or acknowledge that a problem is<br />

not as bad as they once thought.” 155 Advocates are concerned that progress in<br />

reducing maternal mortality – progress in meeting the duty to provide<br />

maternal health care – “will detract from the urgency <strong>of</strong> their cause.” 156<br />

The Lancet study cited a number <strong>of</strong> reasons for the improvement,<br />

including “the increasing ability <strong>of</strong> ‘skilled attendants’ – people with some<br />

medical training – to help women give birth.” 157 Dr. Horton argued that the<br />

study’s finding would not conflict with advocacy goals, stating in a telephone<br />

interview with the New York Times:<br />

People who have spent many years committed to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal health were understandably worried that these figures<br />

could divert attention from an issue that they care passionately<br />

about. But my feeling is that they are misguided in their view that it<br />

151 M. Cheng, Politics <strong>of</strong> aid seen in clash over maternal deaths, ASSOCIATED PRESS (14 April, 2010),<br />

available at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j-phKb8xCQcxd8xanFFF<br />

7f1IN3oAD9F2R4H00.<br />

152 Id.<br />

153 Id.<br />

154 Id.<br />

155 Id.<br />

156 D. Grady, Maternal Deaths Decline Sharply Across the Globe, NY TIMES (13 April, 2010), available at<br />

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/health/14births.html.<br />

157 Id.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!