Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC
Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC
Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Financial reporting<br />
4<br />
• Reinsurance assets would need to include a discount to allow for the probability<br />
of losses from default or disputes.<br />
• The IASB is undecided as to whether an insurer should present premiums as revenue<br />
or as deposit receipts.<br />
• The IASB is undecided as to whether it should address any accounting mismatches<br />
between the fair value through profit or loss value of assets backing unit-linked<br />
contract liabilities <strong>and</strong> the liabilities which are measured using a current exit value<br />
basis (the current exit value basis is the estimated valued for which the risk <strong>and</strong><br />
obligations of the portfolio would be transferred to another entity).<br />
• The impacts above will present some disclosure challenges to insurers.<br />
The discussion paper will be the subject of a presentation by the IASB <strong>and</strong> an education<br />
session by the FSAA during June <strong>2007</strong>. Given that Australian insurers have been fair<br />
value accounting for insurance assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities for a while, players in the industry<br />
are well placed to make submissions to the IASB should they desire.<br />
Phase II: Convergence<br />
The IASB has stated that an important priority of the insurance project is convergence<br />
with US st<strong>and</strong>ards, wherever possible <strong>and</strong> when feasible under the IASB conceptual<br />
framework, <strong>and</strong> consistency with other IASB projects (such as the Revenue Project).<br />
The US st<strong>and</strong>ard setter, the Financial Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Board (FASB) has<br />
expressed an interest in participating in a “modified joint project” in respect of<br />
insurance. This would mean that, following analysis of the comments received on the<br />
phase II discussion paper, the IASB <strong>and</strong> the FASB would undertake a joint project with<br />
the objective of issuing identical or substantially similar st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
THE FAIR VALUE OPTION AND ASSETS BACKING INSURANCE LIABILITIES<br />
The initial AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition <strong>and</strong> Measurement (issued<br />
July 2004) included a free choice option to designate any reliably measurable financial<br />
asset at fair value through profit or loss.<br />
The July 2004 versions of AASB 1023 <strong>and</strong> AASB 1038 compelled insurers to take this<br />
option for financial assets they had determined as backing their insurance liabilities.<br />
However, in response to feedback from, amongst others, the European Central Bank<br />
<strong>and</strong> the European Commission, the IASB, <strong>and</strong> consequently the AASB, introduced<br />
restrictions on the ability to designate financial assets as fair value through profit or loss.<br />
Amendments made in June 2005 (<strong>and</strong> effective for accounting periods beginning on<br />
or after 1 January 2006) now only permit designation when doing so results in more<br />
relevant information because either:<br />
89