04.06.2014 Views

Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC

Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC

Insurance facts and figures 2007 - PwC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Financial reporting<br />

4<br />

• Reinsurance assets would need to include a discount to allow for the probability<br />

of losses from default or disputes.<br />

• The IASB is undecided as to whether an insurer should present premiums as revenue<br />

or as deposit receipts.<br />

• The IASB is undecided as to whether it should address any accounting mismatches<br />

between the fair value through profit or loss value of assets backing unit-linked<br />

contract liabilities <strong>and</strong> the liabilities which are measured using a current exit value<br />

basis (the current exit value basis is the estimated valued for which the risk <strong>and</strong><br />

obligations of the portfolio would be transferred to another entity).<br />

• The impacts above will present some disclosure challenges to insurers.<br />

The discussion paper will be the subject of a presentation by the IASB <strong>and</strong> an education<br />

session by the FSAA during June <strong>2007</strong>. Given that Australian insurers have been fair<br />

value accounting for insurance assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities for a while, players in the industry<br />

are well placed to make submissions to the IASB should they desire.<br />

Phase II: Convergence<br />

The IASB has stated that an important priority of the insurance project is convergence<br />

with US st<strong>and</strong>ards, wherever possible <strong>and</strong> when feasible under the IASB conceptual<br />

framework, <strong>and</strong> consistency with other IASB projects (such as the Revenue Project).<br />

The US st<strong>and</strong>ard setter, the Financial Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Board (FASB) has<br />

expressed an interest in participating in a “modified joint project” in respect of<br />

insurance. This would mean that, following analysis of the comments received on the<br />

phase II discussion paper, the IASB <strong>and</strong> the FASB would undertake a joint project with<br />

the objective of issuing identical or substantially similar st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

THE FAIR VALUE OPTION AND ASSETS BACKING INSURANCE LIABILITIES<br />

The initial AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition <strong>and</strong> Measurement (issued<br />

July 2004) included a free choice option to designate any reliably measurable financial<br />

asset at fair value through profit or loss.<br />

The July 2004 versions of AASB 1023 <strong>and</strong> AASB 1038 compelled insurers to take this<br />

option for financial assets they had determined as backing their insurance liabilities.<br />

However, in response to feedback from, amongst others, the European Central Bank<br />

<strong>and</strong> the European Commission, the IASB, <strong>and</strong> consequently the AASB, introduced<br />

restrictions on the ability to designate financial assets as fair value through profit or loss.<br />

Amendments made in June 2005 (<strong>and</strong> effective for accounting periods beginning on<br />

or after 1 January 2006) now only permit designation when doing so results in more<br />

relevant information because either:<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!