29.06.2014 Views

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The lead practitioner employed a range of pedagogical techniques from writing vocabulary<br />

on the board as pupils generated it, to encouraging pupils to make connections with rhythm in<br />

the real world and worlds of music and film during the music section of some lessons.<br />

Throughout lessons, the lead practitioner demanded close observation from pupils, including<br />

the 3Cs and 3Ss, and the pattern of footfall when stamping out various rhythms.<br />

Observation of teachers<br />

During lessons in the first phase of the evaluation, teachers acted mostly as observers, taking<br />

notes for future reference. They also assisted by undertaking practical tasks such as writing<br />

vocabulary on the board and supporting pupils during storyboarding. At the second round of<br />

observations, this situation had completely changed and teachers undertook all classes on<br />

their own. Typically, after initial explanations by the teacher of the context and recall of<br />

roles, classes were generally pupil-directed.<br />

Teachers allowed pupils to generate the knowledge required to take forward the lessons,<br />

sometimes through ‘sitting back’ but taking careful note of where the lesson was going and<br />

by active intervention at other times. For example, one teacher started a DVD and stopped it<br />

immediately at the title, asking pupils to predict what happens, thereby capturing close<br />

reading of the film from the outset.<br />

Throughout all lessons, the teachers did not accept unsupported answers or first answers.<br />

Instead, they probed using process questions in order to elicit accuracy and justification from<br />

pupils. Mostly, teachers questioned for exploration of ideas on feelings and meaning and<br />

pupils’ suggestions on the content. All answers, suggestions, ideas and other contributions<br />

were challenged and probed for justification.<br />

When the pupils were working individually, in pairs or small groups, teachers supported<br />

those who were slow to get started or who became stuck. One teacher rounded off her lesson<br />

by pointing out that the focus group (which was to follow and would involve the entire class)<br />

was a related activity.<br />

Teachers also used MIE lessons as opportunities to foreground the social aspects of learning.<br />

For example, one teacher began a lesson by recounting previous work on MIE and roles<br />

within this project in detail. She made a point of stressing how criticism had been<br />

constructive and any laughter had been friendly rather than derisory. During filming, she<br />

allowed the class to solve problems that arose without intervening. When asked questions by<br />

pupils, she referred them to the director or camera crew as appropriate. She only intervened<br />

when one pupil appeared to become a little upset. In addition, she ensured that the end<br />

discussion was pupil led and set up a re-run of the film at the pupils’ request. Finally, she led<br />

the discussion toward which parts of the film required more work, what that work was and<br />

when it would be addressed. The pedagogical approach described here was typical of<br />

teachers’ approaches throughout our second round of observations in cluster A.<br />

Observation of pupils<br />

Pupils were attentive and engaged throughout all observed lessons. They were enthusiastic in<br />

their answers to lead practitioner’s and teachers’ questions. Factual recall questions were<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!