29.06.2014 Views

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

Evaluation - Scottish Screen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Initial reaction to <strong>Scottish</strong> <strong>Screen</strong>’s input<br />

Teachers had different levels of ICT skills to bring to the project but, while some approached<br />

the project with anxieties about the technical demands, all were ultimately positive about the<br />

support they received from <strong>Scottish</strong> <strong>Screen</strong> staff, often describing it as ‘excellent.’ The<br />

support from the CPD centre had been appreciated and, where it had been received, teachers<br />

commented on the high quality of the lead practitioner’s training inputs. Most teachers<br />

reported very positively on the follow-up support and accessibility of the lead practitioner,<br />

when further support was required. A small number of teachers, however, felt that access to<br />

the lead practitioner was less than they would have liked. A number of teachers highlighted<br />

the focus on analysis as being highly interesting and supportive of their MIE work and the bfi<br />

pack was also pointed up as being an excellent source of good ideas. One headteacher<br />

commented that, on return from the training, ‘…staff were all fired up’.<br />

All (who had received inputs in school) spoke highly of the lead practitioner’s input and the<br />

children’s responses, which were universally positive. The teachers spoke of the high level of<br />

motivation and enjoyment engendered in the pupils by the lead practitioner sessions and his<br />

enthusiasm was reported to have ‘caught on’ in both teachers’ and pupils’ strong<br />

embracement of MIE. Confidence and self-esteem were again stressed as being clearly<br />

evident during, and beyond, MIE sessions:<br />

I could see a big difference in confidence and self-esteem…<br />

the children could take different parts – director, actor, editor –<br />

and they were so proud of their achievements.’<br />

Teachers saw clear links between MIE and the potential to develop the four capacities of A<br />

Curriculum for Excellence through this medium of learning. All were able to talk about<br />

specific capacities and illustrate, through their MIE experience so far, how they saw the<br />

growth of particular capacities in their pupils. One teacher spoke of the MIE primarysecondary<br />

transition project and the specific development of the pupils’ capacity to be<br />

effective contributors; this was realised through the pupils being able to express ‘their own<br />

voices’ and lead the responses to the primary children’s concerns through creating their own<br />

transition films. Another teacher went further on MIE - ACfE links, expressing the belief that<br />

the four capacities were clearly embedded in MIE:<br />

It just says it all – A Curriculum for Excellence was made for MIE,<br />

not the other way round!<br />

Impact of the programme on teaching<br />

Involvement in the project had caused some teachers to reflect on the impact of MIE on their<br />

own pedagogy. The majority of teachers reported increased motivation when teaching MIE -<br />

even amongst those who had been unclear about the project aims and/or those who had been<br />

initially daunted by the technical aspects. Some teachers had paused on this issue of<br />

motivation and were thinking how this sense of enthusiasm might be injected into their<br />

general teaching across the curriculum. Most had a sense of how MIE could be incorporated<br />

into any curricular area – and across the subject areas.<br />

One member of the secondary school staff had set up an MIE development group (with<br />

colleagues drawn from a range of subject areas) with the specific goal of looking at how<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!