Evaluation - Scottish Screen
Evaluation - Scottish Screen
Evaluation - Scottish Screen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
taking responsibility for their own learning by making decisions about what they will do,<br />
when they will do it and with whom. In MIE pupils are required to plan and organise their<br />
own and each other’s learning leading to active and cooperative learning. Moreover, the<br />
metacognitive style exemplified by lead practitioners, in which there are no definitive right or<br />
wrong answers, and that each pupil contribution is pursued and probed until it is taken to the<br />
limits of the class’s knowledge, has been adopted by the majority of teachers, in some cases<br />
literally revitalising their enthusiasm for teaching. In those schools and nurseries where the<br />
headteachers, teachers and practitioners have recognised MIE as providing benefits rather<br />
than being something else that has to be done, both in terms of content and process, then the<br />
Professional Development Programme has had a significant impact on learning and teaching.<br />
The programme has had a greater impact in primary schools, especially those in which the<br />
headteacher was convinced of the efficacy of MIE. Over the course of the evaluation, neither<br />
of the two secondary schools managed to introduce MIE into the curriculum. In one case,<br />
this was attributable to staffing difficulties; the teacher who had taken part in the Professional<br />
Development Programme had been out of school for a considerable amount of time on leave<br />
of absence. In the other school, the member of staff who had initially led the initiative was<br />
out of school on long-term sickness leave but MIE had survived in the school in the form of<br />
an animation club that met once per week and was run by three members of staff.<br />
The experience of MIE in each of the three contexts has also provided information for<br />
consideration of the Professional Development Programme as a model for introducing MIE<br />
into schools and nurseries. Three aspects of the experience in particular contributed to the<br />
success or otherwise of the programme: the lead practitioner, the headteacher and the local<br />
authority.<br />
The lead practitioners<br />
The quality of the lead practitioner is crucial to the success of the programme. In this model,<br />
it is through the lead practitioner that teachers and pupils gain their first experience of MIE. It<br />
is essential, therefore, that from the outset, the relationship between lead practitioners and<br />
teachers is based on collegiality and trust. Throughout the evaluation, teachers commented<br />
on how much they appreciated that lead practitioners understood children, teachers, and how<br />
classrooms functioned. They also commented favourably on the opportunity to observe lead<br />
practitioners working with pupils and the contribution this had made to building their own<br />
confidence and how they had come to teach MIE. This places a considerable responsibility<br />
on the lead practitioners. First, they have to be seen to know what they are about and the<br />
detailed planning each had undertaken in preparation of MIE lessons was impressive and<br />
appreciated by staff. Secondly, there is a delicate judgement to be made regarding when a<br />
teacher has had adequate support and when and how the lead practitioner reduces their role<br />
and increases that of the teacher. As the lead practitioner in cluster A suggested, it might be<br />
helpful for lead practitioners if best practice could be identified and guidelines produced.<br />
The headteachers<br />
In all of the schools and nurseries involved, the attitude and general approach of the<br />
headteacher to MIE played a major role in the progress or otherwise of the programme. In<br />
those schools where the headteacher or other responsible school manager, was an MIE<br />
51