30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note on the warrant that he has so informed<br />

defendant; <strong>and</strong><br />

Upon being requested by the defendant, take<br />

him before a magistrate in that county.<br />

© 2012 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

That magistrate is to admit the defendant to<br />

the bail specified on the warrant, if any.<br />

(P.C. §§ 821, 822) If the offense is a<br />

misdemeanor, <strong>and</strong> no bail is specified on the<br />

warrant, the magistrate may set the bail.<br />

(P.C. § 822)<br />

If the defendant does not bail out for any<br />

reason, law enforcement officers from the<br />

county where the warrant was issued have<br />

five (5) days (or five (5) court days if the<br />

offense is a felony <strong>and</strong> the law enforcement<br />

agency is more than 400 miles from the<br />

county where the defendant is being held) to<br />

take custody of the defendant. (P.C. §§ 821,<br />

822) (See 62 Op.Cal.Atty.Gen. 78, 2-16-79)<br />

Note: <strong>The</strong>re are no similar statutory<br />

requirements for an out-of-county arrest<br />

made without an arrest warrant (i.e., a<br />

“probable cause” arrest).<br />

Note: Arrests without a Warrant; P.C. § 849(a): An<br />

officer (or private person) making an arrest without<br />

a warrant shall, without unnecessary delay, take the<br />

prisoner not otherwise released before the nearest or<br />

most accessible magistrate in the county in which<br />

the offense is triable, <strong>and</strong> a complaint stating the<br />

charge against the arrested person shall be laid<br />

before such magistrate.<br />

Necessity of Having Probable Cause: Until recently, it has been<br />

held that before a police officer may enter a home, absent consent<br />

to enter, the officer must have “probable cause” to believe the<br />

person who is the subject of the arrest warrant is actually inside at<br />

the time. (See People v. Jacobs (1987) 43 Cal.3 rd 472; United<br />

States v. Gorman (9 th Cir. 2002) 314 F.3 rd 1105; United States v.<br />

Diaz (9 th Cir. 2007) 491 F.3 rd 1074; United States v. Phillips (9 th<br />

Cir. 1974) 497 F.2 nd 1131; (United States v. Gooch (9 th Cir. 2007)<br />

506 F.3 rd 1156, 1159, fn. 2; Cuevas v. De Roco (9 th Cir. 2008) 531<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!