30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was asked to step away from the boarding area at an airport, his<br />

travel documents were taken, <strong>and</strong> he was surrounded by seven<br />

officers with visible h<strong>and</strong>guns; <strong>and</strong> Kaupp v. Texas (2003) 538<br />

U.S. 626, 628-630 [155 L.Ed.2 nd 814, 819-820], three officers,<br />

with three more in the next room, comm<strong>and</strong>ed the 17-year-old<br />

defendant to get out of bed at 3:00 a.m., <strong>and</strong> took him to the police<br />

station for questioning.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Physical Touching of the person of the suspect. (Kaupp v.<br />

Texas, supra, at p. 630 [155 L.Ed.2 nd at p. 820.)<br />

Transporting a Detainee. (Dunaway v. New York (1979) 442 U.S.<br />

200, 206-216 [60 L.Ed.2 nd 824, 832-838]; Taylor v. Alabama<br />

(1982) 457 U.S. 687 [73 L.Ed.2 nd 314].)<br />

As a general rule:<br />

Detention<br />

+ nonconsensual transportation<br />

= arrest.<br />

See also People v. Harris (1975) 15 Cal.3 rd 384, 390-392;<br />

transporting a subject from the site of a traffic stop back to<br />

the scene of the crime for a victim identification, absent<br />

one of the recognized exceptions, was an arrest.<br />

“(W)e have never ‘sustained against <strong>Fourth</strong> <strong>Amendment</strong><br />

challenge the involuntary removal of a suspect from his<br />

home to a police station <strong>and</strong> his detention there for<br />

investigative purposes . . . absent probable cause or judicial<br />

authorization.’ [Citation]” Kaupp v. Texas (2003) 538 U.S.<br />

626, 630 [155 L.Ed.2 nd 814, 820].<br />

But See “Exceptions,” below.<br />

Exceptions: <strong>The</strong> use of firearms, h<strong>and</strong>cuffing, a non-consensual<br />

transportation, <strong>and</strong>/or putting a subject into a patrol car, if necessary under<br />

the circumstances, particularly if precautions are taken to make sure that<br />

the person knows he is only being detained as opposed to being arrested,<br />

or when the use of force is necessitated by the potential danger to the<br />

officers, may be found to be appropriate <strong>and</strong> does not necessarily elevate<br />

the contact into an arrest. (See People v. Celis (2004) 33 Cal.4 th 667, 673-<br />

676.)<br />

© 2012 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

In general, the investigative methods used should be the least<br />

intrusive means reasonably available. Although the use of some<br />

force does not automatically transform an investigatory detention<br />

into an arrest, any overt show of force or authority should be<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!