30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

enforcement officers where none exists. Thus, the<br />

determination of reasonable suspicion must be based on<br />

commonsense judgments <strong>and</strong> inferences about human<br />

behavior.” (Ibid., quoting Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) 528<br />

U.S. 119, 124–125 [145 L. Ed. 2 nd 570].)<br />

In People v. Letner <strong>and</strong> Tobin, supra, a majority of the<br />

Supreme Court found that the unexplained driving at 40<br />

mph in a 55 mph zone, indicating a possible DUI driver,<br />

particularly when combined with the officer’s suspicions<br />

that the car might be stolen when there were water beads on<br />

it from a storm some hours earlier, indicating that it had not<br />

been driven far, <strong>and</strong> when found in an area known for its<br />

many thefts from the nearby car lots, justified an<br />

investigative traffic stop.<br />

Detention of a Victim or Witness:<br />

While a victim or witness, as a general rule, may not be detained or<br />

forced to cooperate in a police investigation, it is argued by some<br />

that when the governmental need is strong <strong>and</strong> the intrusion upon<br />

the victim or witness is minimal, a temporary stop or detention of<br />

the victim or witness may be justifiable. (See Illinois v. Lidster<br />

(2004) 540 U.S. 419 [157 L.Ed.2 nd 843]; vehicle check point used<br />

to locate witnesses to a previous fatal hit <strong>and</strong> run.)<br />

See also Metzker v. State (Ak 1990) 797 P.2 nd 1219; “It<br />

appears the police are justified in stopping witnesses only<br />

where exigent circumstances are present, such as where a<br />

crime has recently been reported.”<br />

Note: No case law yet upholds the transportation of a victim or<br />

witness without that person’s consent.<br />

Articulable Objective Suspicion: A detention, even if brief, is a<br />

sufficiently significant restraint on personal liberty to require “objective<br />

justification.” (Florida v. Royer (1983) 460 U.S. 491, 498 [75 L.Ed.2 nd<br />

229, 236-237].)<br />

Note: Reasons which an officer feels give him or her reasonable<br />

suspicion to detain must be articulated, in detail, in an arrest report<br />

<strong>and</strong> later recounted in courtroom testimony.<br />

An officer’s inability to articulate those suspicious factors<br />

that give rise to the need to stop <strong>and</strong> detain a suspect is one<br />

© 2012 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!