1 - The Black Vault

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Quarterly Report on Unclassified ControUed Nuclear Info rmation (UCNI): The Technical Guidance Division, Office ofNuclear and National Security Information, has distributed the quarterly repon on UCNI activities for the quarter October 1 through December 31, 2000. The Technical Guidance Division's UCNl Program Coordinator prepares this report based on the requirements of section 148e oftbe Atomic Energy Act, 10 CFR 1017. 11 , and DOE Order 471.1, for report preparation to identify and justify precedent-setting UCNI detenninations made during each quarter. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Kang Kun Wu, SO-222, (301) 903-4870 Sonya Bamene, SO-222, (301) 903-2068 CG-SlLEX-I, Joint Australian-United States Classification Guide for Enrichment of Uranium by the SILEX Process: The Technology Program, Technical Guidance Division, Office of Nuclear and National Security Information, continued to resolve comments on the guide and to provide accepted changes to the Classification Analysis and Production Team for inclusion in the guide. In addition, the Technology Program began revising tbe SILEX decision memorandum to Secretary Abraham; the decision memorandum will advise the Secretary that elements of SILEX technology are Restricted Data and request an official detennination of same. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Kang Kun Wu, SO-222, (30 1) 903-4870 Mort Kay, SO-2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-4861 Louis Willett, SO-2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-132 1 Support to tbe Strengthened Safeguards Working Group: The Weapons Program, Technical Guidance Division, Office of Nuclear and National Security Information, participated in a meeting of the DOE Strengthened Safeguards Working Group on January 24 in Washington, D.C. The group discussed the additional protocol to the U.S. International Atomic Energy Agency Safeguards Agreement and associated draft Presidential Decision Directive (POD). The group recommended that the protocol and POD not be sent to the U.S. Senate for advice and consent at this time because interagency roles and responsibilities regarding inspection notification and application ofthe national security exclusion have not yet been codified. Similarly, internal departmental roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined. The group will meet in a special session on February 1 to prepare initial recommendations on these issues. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Edith A. Chalk, SO-222, (301) 903 -1 185 John H. Campbell, SO-222, (30 I) 903-0231 Richard Comerford, SO-2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-1319
Good Press: An employee ofthe Office ofNuclear and National Security Information (ONNSI) was mentioned in the acknowledgments ofa book titled, The Plutonium Files by EiJeen Weisome. for assisting in the Department of Energy's declassification and coordination with the Department ofDefense of a document requested under the Freedom ofInformation Act. The document requested by Mrs. Welsome, Major Aircraft Accidenb F-84G, Eniw.tok, dated April 12, 1952, contained infonnation of the fatal accident of Air Force pilot. Captain Jimmy Robinson, during the Operation Ivy, Mike detonation. cloud sampling mission on November I, 1952. In addition, the Document Declassification Division, ONNSL received a personal thank you telephone can from Captain Robinson's widow and daughter for declassifying the document that provided the information for a chapter efMrs. Welsomc's book., which brought attention to the ultimate sacrifice of Captain Robinson. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Jeffrey A. Zarkin, SO-223, (301) 903-4199 Document Declassification Division (DDD) Continues the Examination of Other Government Agency Open Stack Records at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA): The cbart below portrays the status to date of DDD's characterization of the open stack records at NARA. The totals do not include the surveys of microfilm records being conducted at Germantown. Typt or Chancttrindoll Numbuor EOPLAN COIiKdolll (completed) Week of Jan 18 - 24 P.,es ......... Q. mWlou) .. TotalP.,ft EOPLANS (10 mIWou) Numbtror [OPLAN C.Uecdou (compltUd) Cumulative r ,
Page 2 and 3: Office of Nudcar and National Secur
Page 4 and 5: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 6 and 7: training for completion of the ques
Page 8 and 9: High Priority Review: The Document
Page 10 and 11: ...... ~ .. Office of Nuclear an
Page 14 and 15: I transmittal package for the addit
Page 16 and 17: Suoey/Audit of Air Force Historical
Page 18 and 19: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NA nONAL SECU
Page 20 and 21: Proposed Declassification of the Cu
Page 22 and 23: High Priority Investigation Review:
Page 24 and 25: Office ofNuclear and Na tional Secu
Page 30 and 31: Patent Reviews: The Document Declas
Page 32 and 33: · r .' Office of Nuclear and Nat
Page 34 and 35: VII. Climate Change Nothing to Repo
Page 36 and 37: 4. Ro1Jout a beta/prototype system
Page 38 and 39: had any problems with what will be
Page 40 and 41: Office or Nuclear and Nation:1I Sec
Page 44 and 45: ' Classification Office to replace
Page 46 and 47: Office of Nuclear and National Secu
Page 48 and 49: Executive High Priority Document Re
Page 50 and 51: VIII. Disaster Assistance Nothing t
Page 52 and 53: . - , This particular document has
Page 54 and 55: VIII. Climate Change Nothing to Rep
Page 56 and 57: Document Declassification Division
Page 58 and 59: Office of Nuclear and National Secu
Page 62 and 63: identified as correspondence files
Page 64 and 65: VI. FOlA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 66 and 67: Document Declassification Division
Page 68 and 69: Inrrastructure Asset Evaluation (lA
Page 70 and 71: the Union Carbide Corporation. DOD
Page 72 and 73: public of 100,000 pages ofNational
Page 74 and 75: initiative so lution to improve the
Page 76 and 77: version ofthe hearing records is un
Page 78 and 79:
Office of Nuclear and NaHonal Secur
Page 80 and 81:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 82 and 83:
Typo or Charatltrludon Week ofMar 2
Page 84 and 85:
Office of Nuclear and National Secu
Page 86 and 87:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND N~TIONAL SECU
Page 88 and 89:
epresentatives to expedite task com
Page 90 and 91:
RD findings from the Pre-Executive
Page 92 and 93:
ofthe meeting will be an in-depth a
Page 94 and 95:
eported that AFOTEC has 6 cubic fee
Page 96 and 97:
IV. Work on Secretarial Initiatives
Page 98 and 99:
'.' .. Reviews Program has received
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
time, DDD reviewers reviewed the re
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
October. The report will include th
Page 112 and 113:
Typo or Cbludtmado • Survey Audit
Page 114 and 115:
VI. FOIA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 116 and 117:
Security Administration budgetary i
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
OFFICE OF NuCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
OFFICE OF NUCLE AR AND NATIONAL SEC
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
ofNuc1ear and National Security Inf
Page 132 and 133:
Beryllium Registry: The Document De
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
potentially compromised portions of
Page 138 and 139:
V. Press Inquiries Nothing to Repor
Page 140 and 141:
test-based confidence to simulation
Page 142 and 143:
Office ofNuclear and National Secur
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
change in its June 25 reply to Gabe
Page 148 and 149:
Week ofJun 21-27 Cumulative Type or
Page 150 and 151:
Media Interest: No. Program Contac
Page 152 and 153:
Draft of Fourth Report to Congress
Page 154 and 155:
Review of Draft Unclassified Contro
Page 156 and 157:
postponed due to technical problems
Page 158 and 159:
of developing specific bracketing g
Page 160 and 161:
Type or OaBdlHizatio • Numkro( £
Page 162 and 163:
ofdeveloping specific bracketing gu
Page 164 and 165:
postponed due to technical problems
Page 166 and 167:
. Office of Nuclear and National Se
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
eview to support a damage assessmen
Page 172 and 173:
closeout. The Category mFindings co
Page 174 and 175:
Nothing to Report.
Page 176 and 177:
Week ofJuly 19-25 Cumulative Type o
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
vm.. Climate Change NOlhing 10 Repo
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
• OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL
Page 186 and 187:
for TEP consideration on potential
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
VI. FOlA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 192 and 193:
Project Matrix Step One Report Susp
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Hazardous Material Exposure Data Co
Page 200 and 201:
on the discussions in the meeting,
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Assistant General Counsel for Techn
Page 206 and 207:
m. Upcoming Events or Matters of Se
Page 208 and 209:
ornCE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECUR
Page 210 and 211:
Additionally, E.O. Program per.;onn
Page 212 and 213:
Nothing to Report. V. Press Inquiri
Page 214 and 215:
Glossary for the Streamlining Guida
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
VIll. Climate Change Nothing to Rep
Page 220 and 221:
Support to tbe Department ofJustice
Page 222 and 223:
Protocol's potential impact on nati
Page 224 and 225:
Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR) Me
Page 226 and 227:
implement Public Law 106-398, which
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR Al'ID NATIONAL SE
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Additionally. we have recommended f
Page 238 and 239:
NARA Surveys! Audits Declassified N
Page 240 and 241:
Savannah River Site (SRS) at 50 Yea
Page 242 and 243:
IX. Disaster Assistance Nothing to
Page 244 and 245:
Fourth Report to Congress on Inadve
show all

1 - The Black Vault

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?