1 - The Black Vault

More documents

Recommendations

Info

training for completion of the questionnaires is scheduled at Forrestal for January 12. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Kang Kun Wu, SO-222, (301) 903-4870 Ron Sentell, SO-2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-4255 Joint DOE-DOD Nuclear Weapons Classification Guide, CG-W-4: The Technical Guidance Division, Office ofNuclear and National Securiry Infonnation has reviewed field comments concerning tbe rescission ofCG-W-4. Comments received recommended that 57 topics be carried forward from CG-W-4 to 12 existing or proposed new guides. Ofthese 57. a total of41 were recommended for inclusion in CG-W-5, TCG-WPMU- l, or TCG-NAS-2. Of these 57, 22 were unc1assified topics and eight were Fonnerly Restricted Data (FRD). With the exception of one accident-related FRD topic, the remaining seven are concerned with nuclear storage sites. In two cases, apparently, conflicting guidance was identified. Only three topics were identified more than once. Only one topic identified was recommended for declassification. A letter will be drafted to rescind CG-W -4 and list topics which will be conrinued to be used until such time that changes to existing guides, or new guides, which incorporate these topics or their content. are published. Media Inlerest: No DOE Contact: Edith A. Chalk, SO-222, (30 1) 903-1 185 Walter J. Chrobak, SO-222, (301) 903-8638 Classification Review Support: The Technical Guidance Division, Office of Nuclear and National Security Infonnation received a document from the Lawrence Livennore National Laboratory (LLNL) concerning Halite/Centurion (HIe) targets. It addresses issues concerning four HlC capsules that have recently been proposed for declassification. The Technical Evaluation Panel reviewed the LLNL proposal and recommended that the four capsules could be declassified. The paper discusses the funue of the inertial confmement fusion program using the results ofthe HlC tests as the basis for discussion. Review ofthe document should be completed by January 19. The document itself cannot be released until the declassification is complete. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: EdithA. Chalk, SO-222, (301) 903-1 185 James A. Stone, SO-222, (301) 903-4406 CG-NEM-l: The Technical Guidance Division, Office ofNuc1ear and National Security Infonnation is currently distributing the latest draft of CG-NEM-l , "Joint ClAIDoDIDOEIDOVDOS Classification Guide for Nuclear Explosion Monitoring," to all the signatory agencies and those individuals who provided comments on the last draft. Comments on the revised draft are due 45 days after receipt of the revised guide. At the request of the program office (the Office of Nonproliferation Research and Engineering), the Weapons Program, Technical
Guidance Division, Office ofNuclear and National Security Information is reviewing a draft guide published by the Office ofthe Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Maners covering the same subject matter as CG-NEM-I . Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Edith A. Chalk, SO·222, (301) 903·1185 John H. Campbell, SO·222, (301) 903-0231 Johnnie W. Grant, SO·2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-4867 U.S./Russia Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement (puMDA) Advisory Group: The Weapons Program. Technical Guidance Division, Office ofNuclear and National Security Information participated in development ofa potential method for providing plutonium oxide at the unclassified level for international inspection. The PuMDA Advisory Group met for the first time on December 12, 2000, at the Sandia National Laboratories, Washington, D.C. The group's task is to advise U.S. negotiators on a monitoring and inspection regime which is required by the agreement. The intent is to discuss monitoring and inspection objectives and their priority; to develop a high-level architecture, including desired measurements; and also. to determine what equipment would be needed. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Edith A. Chalk, SO·222, (301) 903·1185 John H. Campbell, SO·222, (301) 903· 8638 Richard Comerford, S0-2221DynMeridian, (301) 903-0231 Document Declassification Division (DDD) Continues the Examination of Other Government Agency Open Stack Records at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA): The chart below portrays the status to date ofDOD's characterization ofthe open stack records at NARA. The totals do not include the surveys ofmicrofilm records being conducted at Germantown. Week of Dec 28 • Jan 3 Cumulative Type or Cb.n~feriZlltioD Numbuor EOPLAN CoUrrdoDJI (compJeft'd) ",n (In ."'..... millionl) Total Pain ID EOPl.A.NS (lD lllliWons) Numbero! EOPLAI'( CoUKtion. (tompl~ Palel .....~d (lD m1Woru) Total Plln In EOPLANS(ln milUonl) Survey 24 0.25 1.00 6228 63.2 134.0 Audit 0 0 0 590 5.1 11.3 DOD's ability to complete surveys ofthe publicly available records by August 2001 is dependent upon NARA correcting its Executive Order 12958 database and locating misplaced I"C('ords. NARA has produced the revised database; DOD has examined the database and will be requesting clarification from NARA. Media Interest: No DOE Contact: Kenneth M. Stein, SO-223, (301) 903·9968 or (301) 713-6213
Page 2 and 3: Office of Nudcar and National Secur
Page 4 and 5: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 8 and 9: High Priority Review: The Document
Page 10 and 11: ...... ~ .. Office of Nuclear an
Page 14 and 15: I transmittal package for the addit
Page 16 and 17: Suoey/Audit of Air Force Historical
Page 18 and 19: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NA nONAL SECU
Page 20 and 21: Proposed Declassification of the Cu
Page 22 and 23: High Priority Investigation Review:
Page 24 and 25: Office ofNuclear and Na tional Secu
Page 28 and 29: Quarterly Report on Unclassified Co
Page 30 and 31: Patent Reviews: The Document Declas
Page 32 and 33: · r .' Office of Nuclear and Nat
Page 34 and 35: VII. Climate Change Nothing to Repo
Page 36 and 37: 4. Ro1Jout a beta/prototype system
Page 38 and 39: had any problems with what will be
Page 40 and 41: Office or Nuclear and Nation:1I Sec
Page 44 and 45: ' Classification Office to replace
Page 46 and 47: Office of Nuclear and National Secu
Page 48 and 49: Executive High Priority Document Re
Page 50 and 51: VIII. Disaster Assistance Nothing t
Page 52 and 53: . - , This particular document has
Page 54 and 55: VIII. Climate Change Nothing to Rep
Page 56 and 57:
Document Declassification Division
Page 58 and 59:
Office of Nuclear and National Secu
Page 60 and 61:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 62 and 63:
identified as correspondence files
Page 64 and 65:
VI. FOlA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 66 and 67:
Document Declassification Division
Page 68 and 69:
Inrrastructure Asset Evaluation (lA
Page 70 and 71:
the Union Carbide Corporation. DOD
Page 72 and 73:
public of 100,000 pages ofNational
Page 74 and 75:
initiative so lution to improve the
Page 76 and 77:
version ofthe hearing records is un
Page 78 and 79:
Office of Nuclear and NaHonal Secur
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Typo or Charatltrludon Week ofMar 2
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND N~TIONAL SECU
Page 88 and 89:
epresentatives to expedite task com
Page 90 and 91:
RD findings from the Pre-Executive
Page 92 and 93:
ofthe meeting will be an in-depth a
Page 94 and 95:
eported that AFOTEC has 6 cubic fee
Page 96 and 97:
IV. Work on Secretarial Initiatives
Page 98 and 99:
'.' .. Reviews Program has received
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
time, DDD reviewers reviewed the re
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
October. The report will include th
Page 112 and 113:
Typo or Cbludtmado • Survey Audit
Page 114 and 115:
VI. FOIA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 116 and 117:
Security Administration budgetary i
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
OFFICE OF NuCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECU
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
OFFICE OF NUCLE AR AND NATIONAL SEC
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
ofNuc1ear and National Security Inf
Page 132 and 133:
Beryllium Registry: The Document De
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
potentially compromised portions of
Page 138 and 139:
V. Press Inquiries Nothing to Repor
Page 140 and 141:
test-based confidence to simulation
Page 142 and 143:
Office ofNuclear and National Secur
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
change in its June 25 reply to Gabe
Page 148 and 149:
Week ofJun 21-27 Cumulative Type or
Page 150 and 151:
Media Interest: No. Program Contac
Page 152 and 153:
Draft of Fourth Report to Congress
Page 154 and 155:
Review of Draft Unclassified Contro
Page 156 and 157:
postponed due to technical problems
Page 158 and 159:
of developing specific bracketing g
Page 160 and 161:
Type or OaBdlHizatio • Numkro( £
Page 162 and 163:
ofdeveloping specific bracketing gu
Page 164 and 165:
postponed due to technical problems
Page 166 and 167:
. Office of Nuclear and National Se
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
eview to support a damage assessmen
Page 172 and 173:
closeout. The Category mFindings co
Page 174 and 175:
Nothing to Report.
Page 176 and 177:
Week ofJuly 19-25 Cumulative Type o
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
vm.. Climate Change NOlhing 10 Repo
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
• OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL
Page 186 and 187:
for TEP consideration on potential
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
VI. FOlA Requests Nothing to Report
Page 192 and 193:
Project Matrix Step One Report Susp
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Hazardous Material Exposure Data Co
Page 200 and 201:
on the discussions in the meeting,
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Assistant General Counsel for Techn
Page 206 and 207:
m. Upcoming Events or Matters of Se
Page 208 and 209:
ornCE OF NUCLEAR AND NATIONAL SECUR
Page 210 and 211:
Additionally, E.O. Program per.;onn
Page 212 and 213:
Nothing to Report. V. Press Inquiri
Page 214 and 215:
Glossary for the Streamlining Guida
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
VIll. Climate Change Nothing to Rep
Page 220 and 221:
Support to tbe Department ofJustice
Page 222 and 223:
Protocol's potential impact on nati
Page 224 and 225:
Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR) Me
Page 226 and 227:
implement Public Law 106-398, which
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR Al'ID NATIONAL SE
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Additionally. we have recommended f
Page 238 and 239:
NARA Surveys! Audits Declassified N
Page 240 and 241:
Savannah River Site (SRS) at 50 Yea
Page 242 and 243:
IX. Disaster Assistance Nothing to
Page 244 and 245:
Fourth Report to Congress on Inadve
show all

1 - The Black Vault

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?