20-05-2011 - State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

iii) iv) The entire cost of the environmental management plan (i.e. capital cost as well as recurring cost) will continue to be borne by the project proponent until the responsibility of environmental management plan is transferred to the occupier/residents society under proper MOU. The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data (both in hard copies as well as by mail) to the respective Regional office of MoEF, the Zonal Office of CPCB and the SPCB/SEIAA. v) Officials from the Regional Office of Ministry of Environment & Forests, Chandigarh / State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority / State Level Expert Appraisal Committee / Punjab Pollution Control Board who would be monitoring the implementation of environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents / data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to State Environment Impact Assessment Authority should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of Ministry of Environment & Forests, Chandigarh/State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority. vi) vii) viii) ix) In the case of any change(s) in the scope of the project, the project would require a fresh appraisal by State Environment Impact Assessment Authority. Separate distribution pipelines be laid down for use of treated effluent / raw water for horticultural/gardening purposes with different colour coding. All other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire Department, Civil Aviation Department, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be obtained, by project proponents from the competent authorities including Punjab Pollution Control Board and from other statutory bodies as applicable. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Punjab Pollution Control Board. The advertisement should be made within seven days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Chandigarh. x) These stipulations would be enforced among others under the provisions of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006. xi) xii) Environmental clearance is subject to final order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 460 of 2004 as may be applicable to this project and decisions of any competent court, to the extent applicable. A copy of the clearance letter shall be sent by the proponent to concerned Panchayat, Zilla Parishad/ Municipal Corporation, Urban local body and the local NGO, if any, from whom suggestions / representations, if any, were received while processing the proposal. The clearance letter shall also be put on the website of the Company by the proponent. 30
xiii) xiv) xv) xvi) The proponent shall upload the status of compliance of the stipulated EC conditions, including results of monitored data on their website and shall update the same periodically. It shall simultaneously be sent to the Regional Office of MoEF, the respective Zonal Office of CPCB and the SPCB. The criteria pollutant levels namely; PM 2.5 , PM 10 , SO 2 , NO x , CO, Pb, Ozone (ambient air as well as stack emissions) shall be monitored and displayed at a convenient location near the main gate of the company in the public domain. The project proponent shall comply with the conditions imposed by the Govt. of India, Central Ground Water Authority, Ministry of Water Resources in the permission granted vide the letter no. No. 21- 4(388)/NWR/CGWA/2010-153 dated 09 Feb, 2011 for abstraction of 909 KLD of ground water. The project proponent shall comply with the conditions imposed by the Department of Town and Country Planning, Punjab, in the permission for CLU granted vide the letter no. No. 161 CTP (Pb)/SP-432(m) dated 11.01.2010. Only IT/ITES industries shall be established in the Integrated Industrial Park and no other category of industries shall be established in the said Park. xvii) The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguards/ measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environmental clearance under the provisions of the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of the suggested safeguards/ measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. xviii) Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Environment Appellate Authority, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 11 of the National Environment Appellate Act, 1987. Item No. SEIAA/31.08 Application for Environmental Clearance for Hotel, Shopping Mall cum Multiplex to be developed by M/s Best City Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd. at Old Civil Hospital Site, Mall Road, Bathinda. The SEIAA observed that: 1. M/s Best City Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd has applied for obtaining environmental clearance for developing a Hotel, Shopping Mall-cum- Multiplex in an area of 18,211 sq. m at Old Civil Hospital Site, Mall Road, Bathinda as required under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. The project of the promoter is covered under category 8 (a) of the Schedule appended to the EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. 2. The case was considered by the SEAC in its 46 th meeting held on 24.4.2011 and the Committee observed that the project proponent has provided adequate and satisfactory clarifications of the observations raised by it, 31
Page 1: STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSE
Page 4 and 5: the project proponent, the Committe
Page 6 and 7: 2. Sh. Hardeep Singh, Deputy Chief
Page 8 and 9: and noise quality should be closely
Page 10 and 11: iii) iv) until the responsibility o
Page 12 and 13: 3. The case was again considered by
Page 14 and 15: m 3 /day of treated sewage will be
Page 16 and 17: group housing complexes having 283
Page 18 and 19: provide 15 m width green belt along
Page 20 and 21: 2013KLD and permission for abstract
Page 22 and 23: II. III. IV. Level Environment Impa
Page 24 and 25: II. shall be no discharge of treate
Page 26 and 27: X. These stipulations would be enfo
Page 28 and 29: XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XXVIII.
Page 32 and 33: therefore, the Committee awarded 'B
Page 34 and 35: e) The project proponent shall plac
Page 36 and 37: 5. The solid waste about 900 kg/day
Page 38 and 39: treat the wastewater. In one STP, o
Page 40 and 41: XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. XVII
Page 42 and 43: PART B - General Conditions : I. Th
Page 44 and 45: Secretary of the SEIAA for grant of
Page 46 and 47: vii) viii) ix) project proponent. P
Page 48 and 49: xiv) xv) xvi) xvii) and displayed a
Page 50 and 51: vi) vii) viii) ix) All the labourer
Page 52 and 53: xii) xiii) xiv) Traffic congestion
Page 54 and 55: The Authority observed that the cas
Page 56 and 57: viii) ix) The green belt design alo
Page 58 and 59: xvi) implementation of the suggeste
Page 60 and 61: the pollution control equipment, so
Page 62 and 63: xii) xiii) the stipulated condition

20-05-2011 - State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?