13.07.2014 Views

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The overall appraisal <strong>of</strong> coastal <strong>an</strong>d mar<strong>in</strong>e priority habitats is divergent (positive <strong>an</strong>d<br />

negative elements).<br />

A more complete account, although not comparable between years, is based on eight<br />

<strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08 (Table 5.2). Those stable <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08 (51%) exceeded<br />

those decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (38%):<br />

Table 5.2<br />

Status <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e <strong>an</strong>d coastal priority habitats <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Source: Biodiversity Action Report<strong>in</strong>g System<br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>e <strong>an</strong>d coastal habitats <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Assessed <strong>in</strong> either year count % count %<br />

Trend unknown 2 25<br />

Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g/accelerat<strong>in</strong>g) 1 13<br />

Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (slow<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1 13 2 25<br />

No clear trend 2 25 1 13<br />

Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably stable 1 13<br />

Stable 3 38 3 38<br />

Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Priority species<br />

Some 136 <strong>biodiversity</strong> priority species (e.g. lower pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d algae; <strong>in</strong>vertebrates,<br />

molluscs <strong>an</strong>d fish; mammals, cetace<strong>an</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d birds) occur <strong>in</strong> coastal <strong>an</strong>d mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

ecosystems <strong>in</strong> Scotl<strong>an</strong>d.<br />

Twelve species which were assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 were re-assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08 (Table 5.3):<br />

dune genti<strong>an</strong>, Genti<strong>an</strong>ella ulig<strong>in</strong>osa; slender scotch burnet moth, Zygaena loti subsp.<br />

Scotica; new forest burnet moth, Zygaena viciae subsp. Argyllensis; lunar yellow<br />

underw<strong>in</strong>g moth, Noctua orbona; natterjack toad, Epidalea calamita; s<strong>an</strong>d lizard,<br />

Lacerta agilis; otter, Lutra lutra; corncrake, Crex crex; roseate tern, Sterna dougallii;<br />

common skate, Dipturus batis; bask<strong>in</strong>g shark, Cetorh<strong>in</strong>us maximus; <strong>an</strong>d bottle-nosed<br />

dolph<strong>in</strong>, Tursiops truncates.<br />

A third <strong>of</strong> those assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 (33%) were decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, compared with a quarter (24%)<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08; the proportion that were stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rose from 59% to 66%.<br />

Table 5.3<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!