13.07.2014 Views

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

Scotland's Wildlife – an assessment of biodiversity in 20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- The appraisal <strong>of</strong> 75 priority species (based on 19 match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08) is unch<strong>an</strong>ged. Of 32 species assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08, the number that were<br />

stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (41%) exceeded the number <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e (25%).<br />

Woodl<strong>an</strong>d<br />

- The appraisal <strong>of</strong> seven priority habitats (based on six match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08) is better. All habitats assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08 were stable or<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

- The appraisal <strong>of</strong> 170 priority species (based on 24 match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08) is divergent (positive <strong>an</strong>d negative elements). Of 31 species<br />

assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08, the number stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (45%) exceeded the number<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or lost (28%).<br />

Upl<strong>an</strong>d<br />

- The appraisal <strong>of</strong> eight priority habitats (based on four match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08) is better. All <strong>of</strong> the assessed habitats were decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (slow<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>20</strong>05, whereas one had become stable by <strong>20</strong>08.<br />

- The trend for 122 priority species (based on 13 match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08) is unch<strong>an</strong>ged. Among 13 species assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08, the proportion<br />

that were stable (84%) exceeded those that were decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (8%).<br />

Scotl<strong>an</strong>d overall<br />

- The overall appraisal <strong>of</strong> 39 priority habitats assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08,<br />

is better. Among 41 habitats assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08, the proportion that were stable or<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (41%) exceeded those decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (31%).<br />

- The overall appraisal <strong>of</strong> 181 priority species assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08<br />

is divergent. Among 230 species assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08, the proportion that were<br />

stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (32%) exceeded those decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or lost (15%).<br />

11.2 Scotl<strong>an</strong>d’s Biodiversity Indicators<br />

The Scotl<strong>an</strong>d approach, as for the UK, is consistent with the global <strong>an</strong>d Europe<strong>an</strong><br />

framework for assess<strong>in</strong>g progress (illustrated <strong>in</strong> Annex 1).<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g a review <strong>an</strong>d public consultation, <strong>in</strong> May <strong>20</strong>04 the Indicators Work<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Scottish Biodiversity Forum proposed a suite <strong>of</strong> 22 <strong>biodiversity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />

Scotl<strong>an</strong>d’s Biodiversity Strategy (Annex 1, column 5). First published by the Scottish<br />

Government <strong>in</strong> November <strong>20</strong>07, they are now ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>an</strong>d updated by Scottish<br />

Natural Heritage. Correspondence between the Scottish <strong>an</strong>d UK suite is close, with<br />

additional <strong>in</strong>dicators on otter r<strong>an</strong>ge (restoration <strong>of</strong> natural potential), mar<strong>in</strong>e pl<strong>an</strong>kton<br />

(ecosystem dynamics) <strong>an</strong>d estuar<strong>in</strong>e fish (restoration <strong>of</strong> natural potential), together with<br />

greenspace <strong>an</strong>d aspects <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>volvement.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!