Scotland's Wildlife â an assessment of biodiversity in 20
Scotland's Wildlife â an assessment of biodiversity in 20
Scotland's Wildlife â an assessment of biodiversity in 20
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The proportion <strong>of</strong> habitats which were decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong>ed unch<strong>an</strong>ged at 34% <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05<br />
<strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08. Those stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rose, from 36% <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 to 45% <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08.<br />
Table 10.2<br />
Trends <strong>in</strong> priority habitat status between <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>20</strong>08<br />
Source: Biodiversity Action Report<strong>in</strong>g System<br />
All ecosystems <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>20</strong>08<br />
Assessed <strong>in</strong> both years count % count %<br />
Trend unknown 9 23 8 21<br />
Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g/accelerat<strong>in</strong>g) 0 0 1 3<br />
Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (slow<strong>in</strong>g) 12 31 10 26<br />
Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1 3 2 5<br />
No clear trend 3 8 1 3<br />
Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably stable 0 0 3 8<br />
Stable 8 21 8 21<br />
Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g - probably <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 0 0 1 3<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g 6 15 5 13<br />
The overall appraisal <strong>of</strong> priority habitats is better.<br />
A more complete account, although not comparable between years, is based on 41<br />
<strong>assessment</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>05 <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08 (Table 10.3). Those stable or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>20</strong>08<br />
(41%) exceeded those decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (31%).<br />
71