17.07.2014 Views

Boxoffice-July.1999

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

j<br />

Having felt like the town's whipping boys<br />

through much of 1997, the studio's managers<br />

suddenly were sitting atop the heap.<br />

They had survived "Titanic." They had<br />

assembled a highly credible summer slate<br />

within prudent budget parameters. They<br />

had even come up with the year's biggest<br />

sleeper, "There's Something About<br />

Mary"...<br />

By summer's end it looked Hke "Dr.<br />

Dolittle" would do $145 million in the<br />

U.S., "The X-Files" would come in at $84<br />

million, and "There's Something About<br />

Mary" would end up near $175 million in<br />

the U.S. and $200 million overseas.<br />

Meanwhile, the studio had done remarkably<br />

well with its smaller films: Though<br />

"Bulworth" failed to crack $26 million<br />

and had little impact overseas, the<br />

domestic gross on "Hope Floats" totaled<br />

$60 million, on "Ever After" $70 million,<br />

and on "How Stella Got Her Groove<br />

Back" $38 miUion.<br />

The tendency of Fox executives to brag<br />

about their superior strategy annoyed<br />

rivals. Fox's success at the boxoffice had<br />

nothing to do with combining low-budgeted,<br />

demographically targeted movies<br />

with so-called multi-quadrant fare, as<br />

management kept crowing. Rather, it was<br />

all about luck—the "movie gods" again,<br />

they said...<br />

Clearly, among all the studio managements.<br />

Fox's stood out in summer '98 as<br />

the luckiest, most resilient, and most<br />

agile. Despite the battering they took<br />

during the days of "Speed 2" and<br />

"Titanic," the team managed to maintain<br />

its appearance of unity and equanimity...<br />

The studio's approval rating was far<br />

from unanimous, however. Many felt<br />

Fox's decision to structure itself into four<br />

distinct divisions had turned out to be<br />

both confusing and redundant. The divisions<br />

were Twentieth Century Fox, led by<br />

Tom Rothman; Fox 2000, run by former<br />

producer Laura Ziskin; Fox Animation,<br />

headed by Chris Meledandri; and Fox<br />

Searchlight, whose president was Lindsay<br />

Law. The grand design was for each division<br />

to produce its own disinctive brand<br />

of film. It had worked, to a degree. Fox<br />

Searchlight, for example, distributed<br />

"The Full Monty," but its four other 1998<br />

releases were disappointments, including<br />

"Shooting Fish" and "Two Girls and a<br />

Guy." Fox Animation got off to a dicey<br />

start with "Anastasia" but was determined<br />

to continue its battle against<br />

Disney. The Ziskin-led Fox 2000<br />

remained relatively inactive in 1998 but<br />

promised a vigorous slate the following<br />

year. That left Rothman's wing with the<br />

out<br />

bulk of the responsibility for filling<br />

the slate. And given this responsibility, it<br />

was Rothman, aided by Sherak, who led<br />

the inspired charge on the Farrelly brothers.<br />

And in doing so, they managed to<br />

more than compensate for the missteps<br />

and redundancies that had been committed<br />

at the studio.<br />

While Fox was standing by its multidivisional<br />

structure despite the overall<br />

mood of belt-tightening, Disney was<br />

headed in quite the opposite direction.<br />

Joe Roth had never been comfortable<br />

with the several units arrayed around the<br />

lot and by the end of summer '98 he had<br />

shut down the biggest. Touchstone<br />

Pictures, and terminated its production<br />

chief, Donald DeLine, consolidating all<br />

filmmaking activity under David Vogel,<br />

who reported to Roth.<br />

Indeed, he was more than ready to<br />

back off further "Armageddon"-style<br />

adventures. Though that project had<br />

never incurred the risks of a "Titanic," it<br />

nonetheless was a high-wire act. And<br />

while Roth had argued against cofinancing<br />

partners on that meagfilm, he was<br />

now more than ready to find partners for<br />

his future big films-with the exception of<br />

animation...<br />

In retrospect. Roth's summer slate had<br />

proven to be a hairy but productive ride.<br />

He had bet the store on "Armageddon"<br />

and, despite all the static, it had been a<br />

winning bet. The movie turned out to be<br />

the only $200 million movie of summer...<br />

In terms of worldwide gross,<br />

"Armageddon" had a good chance to<br />

pass the $500 milHon mark, which only<br />

six other Hollywood films have achieved.<br />

None of Roth's other films came close<br />

to that mark, to be sure. "Mulan" grossed<br />

$120 million in the U.S. and roughly $200<br />

million worldwide... "Six Days, Seven<br />

Nights" ended up grossing $75 million in<br />

the U.S. and a like number<br />

overseas... Paradoxically, these numbers<br />

were matched by Robert Redford's ponderously<br />

self-important movie, "The<br />

Horse Whisperer." "The Parent Trap"<br />

grossed a respectable $70 million in the<br />

U.S. while "Mafia" ended up at $30 million.<br />

Roth's bottom line was that he had<br />

emerged from summer with two solid<br />

moneymakers in "Armageddon" and<br />

"Mulan," which would ultimately provide<br />

grist for Disney's hugely profitable video<br />

arm, its retail outlets, and other ancillary<br />

streams. His other two pricey films, "The<br />

Horse Whisperer" and "Six Days, Seven<br />

Nights," managed to satisfy Hollywood's<br />

rule-of-thumb criterion that if a film's<br />

domestic gross equals its negative cost, it<br />

will ultimately finish in the black...<br />

Of all the principal companies, the<br />

most unsettled by summer '98 was surely<br />

MGM. Undercapitalized and demoralized,<br />

MGM had managed to mobilize<br />

only two movies for summer '98— "Dirty<br />

Work" and "Disturbing Behavior"<br />

...Between them, the once-proud studio<br />

had managed to achieve a pathetic 1.1<br />

percent market share, lower even than<br />

Universal's 2.4 percent. Frank Mancuso,<br />

MGM's cagey chairman, said he had<br />

been troubled by the summer crush and<br />

so had delayed playing his "ace,"<br />

"Ronin," a $75 million thriller, until<br />

fall...Though it picked up some reasonably<br />

good reviews, the noirish thriller<br />

duplicitously, and the people of an old<br />

generation should have known bettei<br />

legendary director Norman Jewis(<br />

explaining his approach to life and art:<br />

like to think I'm still rebellious. I st<br />

admire rebels.. .I'm a loner, not a joiner<br />

don't know where that comes from, bu;<br />

think it's true of most filmmakers"; ar<br />

even "Titanic" helmer James Camerc<br />

offering advice to future moviemaker<br />

"I think the true and proper schooiii<br />

for a filmmaker is sitting in a movie th<br />

atre watching film, even if that meai<br />

you go to see it two or three times."<br />

Highlighting the directors' methoc<br />

ologies and personal intent, 'A C\<br />

Above" should be appreciated by bot<br />

fihn students and film buffs eager to gai<br />

access to the conceptual artistry behin<br />

some of their favorite films.<br />

"Screenwriters: America's<br />

Storytellers in Portrait" by Helena<br />

Lumme & Mika Manninen<br />

(Angel City Press, 128 pgs., $30)<br />

Sometimes a picture says a thousan.<br />

words and this work is a beautifully illus<br />

trated example of that adage. The boo;:<br />

encompasses a series of portraits, com<br />

plete with filmographies and index list<br />

ings.<br />

"Screenwriters" is a lively collection o<br />

photos that put faces to the names o<br />

some of Hollywood's most celebratec<br />

writers. Subjects of the portraiture!<br />

include William Kelley ("Witness")'<br />

Callie Khouri ("Thelma and Louise"<br />

and Paul Schrader ("Affliction"). Alsc<br />

decorating the book, besides theiil<br />

images, is the screenwriters' stronges<br />

attribute: Their words. Julius Epsteir<br />

quips, "What amuses me is that they paj<br />

a million dollars for a script, then pui<br />

another writer on to write it," while<br />

Khouri notes, "I fell into screenwritin^<br />

much like Alice fell down the rabbit hole.<br />

And now I'm in a world that makes<br />

about as much sense."<br />

Although this portrait tome may not<br />

qualify as true summer "reading," it doe^<br />

make a nice addition to any coffee table!<br />

and just might come in handy for lazy<br />

perusing on those indoor-only, air-conditioned<br />

days.<br />

"The Film Festival Guide: For<br />

Filmmakers, Film Buffs, and<br />

Industry Professionals" by Adam<br />

|<br />

Langer (Chicago Review Press,<br />

269 pgs., $16.95)<br />

The title of Adam Langer's "The Film;<br />

Festival Guide: For Filmmakers. Film<br />

Buffs, and Industry Professionals"<br />

makes no bones about the purpose of the<br />

book: To serve as a comprehensive manual<br />

that provides filmmakers and industry<br />

insiders with valuable information<br />

concerning event contacts, dates, venues<br />

and deadlines for entries. Fortunately, his<br />

work also functions as an insightful<br />

guide oflering advice to the plain old<br />

movie bulT who wants to catch a few<br />

I<br />

30 BOXOFFICE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!