You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
j<br />
Having felt like the town's whipping boys<br />
through much of 1997, the studio's managers<br />
suddenly were sitting atop the heap.<br />
They had survived "Titanic." They had<br />
assembled a highly credible summer slate<br />
within prudent budget parameters. They<br />
had even come up with the year's biggest<br />
sleeper, "There's Something About<br />
Mary"...<br />
By summer's end it looked Hke "Dr.<br />
Dolittle" would do $145 million in the<br />
U.S., "The X-Files" would come in at $84<br />
million, and "There's Something About<br />
Mary" would end up near $175 million in<br />
the U.S. and $200 million overseas.<br />
Meanwhile, the studio had done remarkably<br />
well with its smaller films: Though<br />
"Bulworth" failed to crack $26 million<br />
and had little impact overseas, the<br />
domestic gross on "Hope Floats" totaled<br />
$60 million, on "Ever After" $70 million,<br />
and on "How Stella Got Her Groove<br />
Back" $38 miUion.<br />
The tendency of Fox executives to brag<br />
about their superior strategy annoyed<br />
rivals. Fox's success at the boxoffice had<br />
nothing to do with combining low-budgeted,<br />
demographically targeted movies<br />
with so-called multi-quadrant fare, as<br />
management kept crowing. Rather, it was<br />
all about luck—the "movie gods" again,<br />
they said...<br />
Clearly, among all the studio managements.<br />
Fox's stood out in summer '98 as<br />
the luckiest, most resilient, and most<br />
agile. Despite the battering they took<br />
during the days of "Speed 2" and<br />
"Titanic," the team managed to maintain<br />
its appearance of unity and equanimity...<br />
The studio's approval rating was far<br />
from unanimous, however. Many felt<br />
Fox's decision to structure itself into four<br />
distinct divisions had turned out to be<br />
both confusing and redundant. The divisions<br />
were Twentieth Century Fox, led by<br />
Tom Rothman; Fox 2000, run by former<br />
producer Laura Ziskin; Fox Animation,<br />
headed by Chris Meledandri; and Fox<br />
Searchlight, whose president was Lindsay<br />
Law. The grand design was for each division<br />
to produce its own disinctive brand<br />
of film. It had worked, to a degree. Fox<br />
Searchlight, for example, distributed<br />
"The Full Monty," but its four other 1998<br />
releases were disappointments, including<br />
"Shooting Fish" and "Two Girls and a<br />
Guy." Fox Animation got off to a dicey<br />
start with "Anastasia" but was determined<br />
to continue its battle against<br />
Disney. The Ziskin-led Fox 2000<br />
remained relatively inactive in 1998 but<br />
promised a vigorous slate the following<br />
year. That left Rothman's wing with the<br />
out<br />
bulk of the responsibility for filling<br />
the slate. And given this responsibility, it<br />
was Rothman, aided by Sherak, who led<br />
the inspired charge on the Farrelly brothers.<br />
And in doing so, they managed to<br />
more than compensate for the missteps<br />
and redundancies that had been committed<br />
at the studio.<br />
While Fox was standing by its multidivisional<br />
structure despite the overall<br />
mood of belt-tightening, Disney was<br />
headed in quite the opposite direction.<br />
Joe Roth had never been comfortable<br />
with the several units arrayed around the<br />
lot and by the end of summer '98 he had<br />
shut down the biggest. Touchstone<br />
Pictures, and terminated its production<br />
chief, Donald DeLine, consolidating all<br />
filmmaking activity under David Vogel,<br />
who reported to Roth.<br />
Indeed, he was more than ready to<br />
back off further "Armageddon"-style<br />
adventures. Though that project had<br />
never incurred the risks of a "Titanic," it<br />
nonetheless was a high-wire act. And<br />
while Roth had argued against cofinancing<br />
partners on that meagfilm, he was<br />
now more than ready to find partners for<br />
his future big films-with the exception of<br />
animation...<br />
In retrospect. Roth's summer slate had<br />
proven to be a hairy but productive ride.<br />
He had bet the store on "Armageddon"<br />
and, despite all the static, it had been a<br />
winning bet. The movie turned out to be<br />
the only $200 million movie of summer...<br />
In terms of worldwide gross,<br />
"Armageddon" had a good chance to<br />
pass the $500 milHon mark, which only<br />
six other Hollywood films have achieved.<br />
None of Roth's other films came close<br />
to that mark, to be sure. "Mulan" grossed<br />
$120 million in the U.S. and roughly $200<br />
million worldwide... "Six Days, Seven<br />
Nights" ended up grossing $75 million in<br />
the U.S. and a like number<br />
overseas... Paradoxically, these numbers<br />
were matched by Robert Redford's ponderously<br />
self-important movie, "The<br />
Horse Whisperer." "The Parent Trap"<br />
grossed a respectable $70 million in the<br />
U.S. while "Mafia" ended up at $30 million.<br />
Roth's bottom line was that he had<br />
emerged from summer with two solid<br />
moneymakers in "Armageddon" and<br />
"Mulan," which would ultimately provide<br />
grist for Disney's hugely profitable video<br />
arm, its retail outlets, and other ancillary<br />
streams. His other two pricey films, "The<br />
Horse Whisperer" and "Six Days, Seven<br />
Nights," managed to satisfy Hollywood's<br />
rule-of-thumb criterion that if a film's<br />
domestic gross equals its negative cost, it<br />
will ultimately finish in the black...<br />
Of all the principal companies, the<br />
most unsettled by summer '98 was surely<br />
MGM. Undercapitalized and demoralized,<br />
MGM had managed to mobilize<br />
only two movies for summer '98— "Dirty<br />
Work" and "Disturbing Behavior"<br />
...Between them, the once-proud studio<br />
had managed to achieve a pathetic 1.1<br />
percent market share, lower even than<br />
Universal's 2.4 percent. Frank Mancuso,<br />
MGM's cagey chairman, said he had<br />
been troubled by the summer crush and<br />
so had delayed playing his "ace,"<br />
"Ronin," a $75 million thriller, until<br />
fall...Though it picked up some reasonably<br />
good reviews, the noirish thriller<br />
duplicitously, and the people of an old<br />
generation should have known bettei<br />
legendary director Norman Jewis(<br />
explaining his approach to life and art:<br />
like to think I'm still rebellious. I st<br />
admire rebels.. .I'm a loner, not a joiner<br />
don't know where that comes from, bu;<br />
think it's true of most filmmakers"; ar<br />
even "Titanic" helmer James Camerc<br />
offering advice to future moviemaker<br />
"I think the true and proper schooiii<br />
for a filmmaker is sitting in a movie th<br />
atre watching film, even if that meai<br />
you go to see it two or three times."<br />
Highlighting the directors' methoc<br />
ologies and personal intent, 'A C\<br />
Above" should be appreciated by bot<br />
fihn students and film buffs eager to gai<br />
access to the conceptual artistry behin<br />
some of their favorite films.<br />
"Screenwriters: America's<br />
Storytellers in Portrait" by Helena<br />
Lumme & Mika Manninen<br />
(Angel City Press, 128 pgs., $30)<br />
Sometimes a picture says a thousan.<br />
words and this work is a beautifully illus<br />
trated example of that adage. The boo;:<br />
encompasses a series of portraits, com<br />
plete with filmographies and index list<br />
ings.<br />
"Screenwriters" is a lively collection o<br />
photos that put faces to the names o<br />
some of Hollywood's most celebratec<br />
writers. Subjects of the portraiture!<br />
include William Kelley ("Witness")'<br />
Callie Khouri ("Thelma and Louise"<br />
and Paul Schrader ("Affliction"). Alsc<br />
decorating the book, besides theiil<br />
images, is the screenwriters' stronges<br />
attribute: Their words. Julius Epsteir<br />
quips, "What amuses me is that they paj<br />
a million dollars for a script, then pui<br />
another writer on to write it," while<br />
Khouri notes, "I fell into screenwritin^<br />
much like Alice fell down the rabbit hole.<br />
And now I'm in a world that makes<br />
about as much sense."<br />
Although this portrait tome may not<br />
qualify as true summer "reading," it doe^<br />
make a nice addition to any coffee table!<br />
and just might come in handy for lazy<br />
perusing on those indoor-only, air-conditioned<br />
days.<br />
"The Film Festival Guide: For<br />
Filmmakers, Film Buffs, and<br />
Industry Professionals" by Adam<br />
|<br />
Langer (Chicago Review Press,<br />
269 pgs., $16.95)<br />
The title of Adam Langer's "The Film;<br />
Festival Guide: For Filmmakers. Film<br />
Buffs, and Industry Professionals"<br />
makes no bones about the purpose of the<br />
book: To serve as a comprehensive manual<br />
that provides filmmakers and industry<br />
insiders with valuable information<br />
concerning event contacts, dates, venues<br />
and deadlines for entries. Fortunately, his<br />
work also functions as an insightful<br />
guide oflering advice to the plain old<br />
movie bulT who wants to catch a few<br />
I<br />
30 BOXOFFICE