QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Grumbles and Growls: Feminist Theory of Judaism, 1971-1985<br />
flatly rejects theology as a means of Jewish discourse 16 gives<br />
space to others to conceptualize God in the Jewish feminist<br />
context.<br />
“Notes” does address problems intrinsic to Jewish<br />
tradition, despite its anti-theological thrust. While steeped in<br />
immutable notions of justice, Ozick laments, the Torah lacks one<br />
pivotal axiom to purge misogyny from history, a single<br />
commandment to complete the Covenant. “There is no mighty<br />
‘thou shalt not lessen the humanity of women!’ to echo<br />
downward from age to age,” 17 she thunders. “In one remarkable<br />
instance only there is lacking the cleansing force of ‘Thou shalt<br />
not,’ and the abuses of society are permitted to have their way<br />
almost unchecked by Torah.” 18 Ozick’s argument is generally<br />
interpreted as a sociological and not a biblical critique. 19 For her<br />
the problem is rabbinic interpretation and not the Torah own<br />
mistaken theological thrust. The rabbis have misinterpreted<br />
divine directive, inculcating women’s subordination. However,<br />
the author ultimately seems conflicted about the role of<br />
patriarchy in the Torah’s very axioms. In rendering the biblical<br />
text incomplete, her criticism seems to branch in two directions.<br />
Ozick the sociological reformer might be equally characterized<br />
16 Ozick, 122.<br />
17 Ozick, 149.<br />
18 Ozick, 146.<br />
19 Susannah Heschel, ed. On Being a Jewish Feminist: A Reader (New York:<br />
Schocken Books, 1995), 115.<br />
103