24.07.2014 Views

QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA

QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA

QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Quaestio<br />

thought, one characterized by the emergence of feminist<br />

theologies, and with them woman-centered analyses of Judaism.<br />

Thus, feminism’s interaction with Judaism began with<br />

rebellion. Yet despite their dissatisfaction with the faith, our<br />

protagonists each grappled with the ramifications of Torah and<br />

its male-constructed commentary. There exists tension between<br />

the desire for radicalism and the yearning for accommodation, a<br />

longing for community despite its patriarchy. 38 For Adler and<br />

Ozick, this means seeking new halakhic interpretations to assist<br />

Jewish-feminist reconciliation. And although Plaskow questions<br />

the efficacy of such tactics—even the very capacity of halakha<br />

to rectify women’s subordination—she too wrestles with the<br />

implications and importance of Torah; Plaskow clings to<br />

tradition even as she purges its patriarchal focus. 39 The academic<br />

Rochelle L. Millen concludes, “law…together with liturgy and<br />

language constitutes the foundation upon which the multistoried<br />

building of Jewish feminist theory continues to be<br />

constructed.” 40 If something is rotten in Eden, then Torah,<br />

broadly speaking, is equally the cause and the solution to<br />

Judaism’s patriarchal woes—ultimately, there is little alternative.<br />

38 Rive-Ellen Prell, Women Remaking American Judaism, 9.<br />

39 Tamar Ross, Expanding the Palace of Torah, (Lebanon, NH: Brandeis<br />

University Press, 118).<br />

40 Rochelle L. Millen, “Her Mouth is Full of Wisdom,” 43<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!