01.08.2014 Views

Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail Connection–Bucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...

Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail Connection–Bucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...

Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail Connection–Bucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

This Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared by the <strong>Surface</strong> Transportation Board’s (Board)<br />

Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA) in accordance with the Board’s orders in Decision No. 9,<br />

served on June 12, 1997, and Decision No. 12, served on July 23, 1997, in Finance Docket No. 33388.<br />

The EA describes the potential environmental impacts of a proposed new rail line connection between<br />

the existing <strong>Norfolk</strong> & Western <strong>Rail</strong>way Company, a subsidiary of <strong>Norfolk</strong> <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Rail</strong>way<br />

Company (NS), and <strong>Conrail</strong> (<strong>Conrail</strong>) rail lines in Bucyrus, <strong>Ohio</strong>. The proposed construction site is<br />

surrounded by the existing NS and <strong>Conrail</strong> rail lines, businesses, residences, undeveloped properties,<br />

electrical utility lines, and a fuel distribution facility. <strong>Rail</strong> traffic on this connection is anticipated to<br />

average eight trains per day. According to NS, this construction would provide a new, more direct and<br />

efficient train route from Columbus, <strong>Ohio</strong> to eastern <strong>Ohio</strong> and western Pennsylvania, increase rail traffic<br />

capacity, improve service to shippers and reduce rail traffic congestion in Cleveland, <strong>Ohio</strong>.<br />

After providing an overview of the proposed construction plan, this EA describes the different<br />

alternatives considered in developing that construction plan. It then addresses various aspects of the<br />

existing environment at the site of the proposed connection. Next, the potential environmental impacts<br />

of construction of the proposed connection are discussed. Finally, a summary is provided of agency<br />

comments which relate to the project, along with NS’ responses to agency comments and explanations<br />

of mitigation measures proposed by NS, and SEA’s recommended mitigation measures.<br />

As shown in Table ES-1, potential environmental impacts related to the proposed project are<br />

insignificant or nonexistent. Based on its independent analysis of all the information available at this<br />

time, SEA concludes that the proposed project is not expected to have any significant adverse impact<br />

on land use, socioeconomics and environmental justice, transportation, safety, water resources,<br />

biological resources, air quality, noise, or energy. The proposed project would require the demolition<br />

of a former Toledo and <strong>Ohio</strong> Central (T&OC) freight depot, a potentially historic site, which is on<br />

private property. Coordination with the <strong>Ohio</strong> State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will be<br />

required to determine if the depot is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).<br />

Overall transportation and energy efficiency of the NS system will be improved by the construction of<br />

the connection.<br />

The proposed project would require one new grade crossing and one expanded grade crossing. Warning<br />

devices (gates and flashing lights) would be installed at the new crossing. The warning devices (flashing<br />

lights) at the existing crossing would be upgraded from flashing lights to include gates.<br />

Any increase in noise levels during construction would be limited to normal work hours and would only<br />

occur during the expected three to six month construction period.<br />

ES-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!