Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail ConnectionâBucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...
Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail ConnectionâBucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...
Norfolk Southern/Conrail Rail ConnectionâBucyrus, Ohio - Surface ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
This Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared by the <strong>Surface</strong> Transportation Board’s (Board)<br />
Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA) in accordance with the Board’s orders in Decision No. 9,<br />
served on June 12, 1997, and Decision No. 12, served on July 23, 1997, in Finance Docket No. 33388.<br />
The EA describes the potential environmental impacts of a proposed new rail line connection between<br />
the existing <strong>Norfolk</strong> & Western <strong>Rail</strong>way Company, a subsidiary of <strong>Norfolk</strong> <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Rail</strong>way<br />
Company (NS), and <strong>Conrail</strong> (<strong>Conrail</strong>) rail lines in Bucyrus, <strong>Ohio</strong>. The proposed construction site is<br />
surrounded by the existing NS and <strong>Conrail</strong> rail lines, businesses, residences, undeveloped properties,<br />
electrical utility lines, and a fuel distribution facility. <strong>Rail</strong> traffic on this connection is anticipated to<br />
average eight trains per day. According to NS, this construction would provide a new, more direct and<br />
efficient train route from Columbus, <strong>Ohio</strong> to eastern <strong>Ohio</strong> and western Pennsylvania, increase rail traffic<br />
capacity, improve service to shippers and reduce rail traffic congestion in Cleveland, <strong>Ohio</strong>.<br />
After providing an overview of the proposed construction plan, this EA describes the different<br />
alternatives considered in developing that construction plan. It then addresses various aspects of the<br />
existing environment at the site of the proposed connection. Next, the potential environmental impacts<br />
of construction of the proposed connection are discussed. Finally, a summary is provided of agency<br />
comments which relate to the project, along with NS’ responses to agency comments and explanations<br />
of mitigation measures proposed by NS, and SEA’s recommended mitigation measures.<br />
As shown in Table ES-1, potential environmental impacts related to the proposed project are<br />
insignificant or nonexistent. Based on its independent analysis of all the information available at this<br />
time, SEA concludes that the proposed project is not expected to have any significant adverse impact<br />
on land use, socioeconomics and environmental justice, transportation, safety, water resources,<br />
biological resources, air quality, noise, or energy. The proposed project would require the demolition<br />
of a former Toledo and <strong>Ohio</strong> Central (T&OC) freight depot, a potentially historic site, which is on<br />
private property. Coordination with the <strong>Ohio</strong> State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will be<br />
required to determine if the depot is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).<br />
Overall transportation and energy efficiency of the NS system will be improved by the construction of<br />
the connection.<br />
The proposed project would require one new grade crossing and one expanded grade crossing. Warning<br />
devices (gates and flashing lights) would be installed at the new crossing. The warning devices (flashing<br />
lights) at the existing crossing would be upgraded from flashing lights to include gates.<br />
Any increase in noise levels during construction would be limited to normal work hours and would only<br />
occur during the expected three to six month construction period.<br />
ES-1