30.08.2014 Views

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Version</strong> 161<br />

Issues Resolved<br />

<br />

In case where Balance column of PLA Register was Nil, if CENVAT Adjustment journal<br />

voucher or payment entry using Excise Duty Ledgers were recorded, the balance column was<br />

showing the sum of opening balance of that particular month and the balance amount.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<br />

On recording Excise Sales with Nature of Removal as Captive Consumption and without<br />

selecting Excise Duty Ledgers, then the captive consumption quantity and assessable<br />

value were getting doubled in Form ER – 1.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Version</strong> 159<br />

Enhancements<br />

<br />

The facility is provided to account for PLA Opening Balance and the value gets captured in<br />

Excise Computation, PLA Register and Summary, Form ER-1 (Table 7) and Form ER-3 (Table<br />

5). This amount will be available for recording CENVAT Adjustment entry in journal voucher<br />

on selecting the flag - Adjustment Towards Advance Duty Paid.<br />

The quantity details entered in Excise Debit Note by selecting the nature of purchase -<br />

Removal as such gets captured in Removal as such column of RG23 A Part I.<br />

<strong>Version</strong> 158<br />

Enhancements<br />

<br />

In RG23A Part I the option - For the month of is provided to print the report for a particular<br />

month.<br />

Issues Resolved<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

In a company having two excise units/godowns, if entries were recorded in voucher types created<br />

for Raw Material and Finished Goods, the values were being captured in both the units/<br />

godowns.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

Two duty heads SED and Special Excise Duty was displayed on adjusting CENVAT credit<br />

of special excise duty with Excise Duty and the adjusted amount and closing balance<br />

were not captured properly in Abstract report.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

For Excise Sales recorded with additional ledgers, the assessable value was being captured<br />

excluding the additional ledgers value in Form ER 1.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

In a company with TWO Excise Units, details of the Raw materials consumed and finished<br />

goods accounted by using separate set of voucher types was capturing in Form ER- 6 of<br />

both the Excise Units.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Tally</strong>.<strong>ERP</strong> 9 <strong>Release</strong> <strong>Notes</strong> for <strong>Stat.900</strong><br />

©<strong>Tally</strong> Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!