Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes
Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes
Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.4 Stat.900 Version 169 Release Notes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Version</strong> 161<br />
Issues Resolved<br />
<br />
In case where Balance column of PLA Register was Nil, if CENVAT Adjustment journal<br />
voucher or payment entry using Excise Duty Ledgers were recorded, the balance column was<br />
showing the sum of opening balance of that particular month and the balance amount.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
<br />
On recording Excise Sales with Nature of Removal as Captive Consumption and without<br />
selecting Excise Duty Ledgers, then the captive consumption quantity and assessable<br />
value were getting doubled in Form ER – 1.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
<strong>Version</strong> 159<br />
Enhancements<br />
<br />
The facility is provided to account for PLA Opening Balance and the value gets captured in<br />
Excise Computation, PLA Register and Summary, Form ER-1 (Table 7) and Form ER-3 (Table<br />
5). This amount will be available for recording CENVAT Adjustment entry in journal voucher<br />
on selecting the flag - Adjustment Towards Advance Duty Paid.<br />
The quantity details entered in Excise Debit Note by selecting the nature of purchase -<br />
Removal as such gets captured in Removal as such column of RG23 A Part I.<br />
<strong>Version</strong> 158<br />
Enhancements<br />
<br />
In RG23A Part I the option - For the month of is provided to print the report for a particular<br />
month.<br />
Issues Resolved<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In a company having two excise units/godowns, if entries were recorded in voucher types created<br />
for Raw Material and Finished Goods, the values were being captured in both the units/<br />
godowns.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
Two duty heads SED and Special Excise Duty was displayed on adjusting CENVAT credit<br />
of special excise duty with Excise Duty and the adjusted amount and closing balance<br />
were not captured properly in Abstract report.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
For Excise Sales recorded with additional ledgers, the assessable value was being captured<br />
excluding the additional ledgers value in Form ER 1.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
In a company with TWO Excise Units, details of the Raw materials consumed and finished<br />
goods accounted by using separate set of voucher types was capturing in Form ER- 6 of<br />
both the Excise Units.<br />
This issue has been resolved.<br />
<strong>Tally</strong>.<strong>ERP</strong> 9 <strong>Release</strong> <strong>Notes</strong> for <strong>Stat.900</strong><br />
©<strong>Tally</strong> Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 9