11.09.2014 Views

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Several years ago, Reader’s Digest magazine had a phantom<br />

patient that went from office to office. And I forget<br />

the situation, but apparently the fees that came back<br />

ranged anywhere between $2,000 and $25,000. One of<br />

the journals had the patient’s X-rays and all that. And I<br />

looked at that case and thought: The only dentist who<br />

got it right was the dentist who charged $20,000. Because<br />

he was the guy that took the models, was putting<br />

them in the splint, who did the equilibrations, who did<br />

the case well. And the dentists who cried about it<br />

were the ones losing money because they didn’t know<br />

how to set fees, and they thought this guy was a bandit.<br />

He’s not a bandit; he just knew what he was doing.<br />

Big difference there.<br />

MD: You mentioned to me a study that you have in which<br />

more than 100 dentists participated, doing the same type<br />

of thing as the Reader’s Digest article. This is probably long<br />

overdue in dentistry, because dentists had a knee-jerk reaction<br />

to it: Oh my gosh! It’s not like in dentistry we take an<br />

FMX into a machine and then out comes a treatment plan<br />

with the fees already on there. It kind of would be nice in<br />

a sense: “Your case is going to be $20,000.” And the patient<br />

gasps and we just say, “It’s the machine! We all use the same<br />

one. Go to the dentist down the street and he’ll tell you the<br />

same thing.” Because now you’re taking the emotion out of<br />

the dentist and the guilt about telling somebody they need<br />

$20,000 worth of dentistry. So, it was a study that was done<br />

by some friends of yours, where they had 126 dentists treatment<br />

plan an 8-unit case, with some other things that needed<br />

to be done. There, you also saw fees all across the board. Tell<br />

our readers about that study.<br />

PH: Ken Mathys and I teamed up years ago, and taking<br />

what I’ve described as this right-fee solution, that’s the<br />

brand we use for this. And that’s taking your fee schedule<br />

and proportioning it so that the fees of different procedures<br />

you do make sense to each other. For example, the<br />

care and skill and judgment of doing a simple posterior<br />

crown may be less than the skill needed to do a Locator ®<br />

Bar Overdenture. So there’s going to be a difference of<br />

skill between those two.<br />

Ken is a CPA, and he runs a company called <strong>Dental</strong> Practice<br />

Advisors (dentalpracticeadvisors.com). I asked Ken to<br />

use his CPA stamp-of-approval on the spreadsheet that I<br />

gave him. That is, take it up to the CPA level of accountability.<br />

Well, he and his team did a wonderful job. What<br />

they did in 2006 is take 126 of their best clients, dentists<br />

who are working under a financial plan and who care,<br />

and they gave each of these dentists the same 8-unit case.<br />

And this 8-unit case involved changes in vertical dimension<br />

and anterior guidance and those sorts of things.<br />

Ken worked it out; he worked with another dentist to put<br />

this case together, all the different appointments,<br />

what they would need to do. Then<br />

he gave this sample case to 126 dentists and<br />

asked them: How much time would you<br />

spend doing it and what would you charge?<br />

The numbers these dentists came back with<br />

were all over the place. Fewer than 15 percent<br />

of the dentists made any change in fee<br />

relative to changing those four variables –<br />

anterior guidance, vertical dimension, condylar<br />

position or incisal edge position.<br />

MD: So, essentially, they just took their crown<br />

fees and multiplied it times eight?<br />

PH: Exactly. Eighty five percent of the dentists<br />

did that. When you look at the profitability<br />

aspect of it, close to 20 percent of the<br />

dentists were netting out less than if they<br />

were doing single-unit posterior units.<br />

MD: Wow, talk about a kick in the groin.<br />

PH: It’s amazing. When you see the math<br />

you just want to shake your head. The big<br />

culprit is time. The biggest mistake a dentist<br />

can make is to look at his profit and say, I<br />

need to find a cheaper lab. A cheaper lab is<br />

not the answer. What you want is a lab that<br />

can get the job done right the first time. The<br />

answer to many of our profitability issues<br />

has to do with time and leadership. Time<br />

is the divisor. That is, if you use two hours<br />

instead of three hours, that’s a huge difference<br />

in profitability. Time is a big culprit.<br />

Ultimately, Mike, you arrive at a fee that<br />

might be 40 to 70 percent more than you<br />

would normally charge.<br />

MD: What does the average dentist say when<br />

it’s suggested to them that they need to do that?<br />

Do they say, “I can’t do that”?<br />

PH: Exactly. They look at it and say: “I have<br />

a hard enough time selling a $10,000 case.<br />

Now you’re saying that it’s a $17,000 case?”<br />

Well, it is based on the amount of time and<br />

risk that you have to do. And they say, “Well,<br />

I can’t sell that.” That’s where it goes into<br />

leadership. That’s when the dentist needs to<br />

look in the mirror and say to him or herself,<br />

“What do I need to do in how I present care<br />

to patients? How do I train my team? How<br />

do I run my facility? How do I earn the right<br />

Interview with Dr. Paul Homoly35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!