11.09.2014 Views

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Creating Surgical Guides Using CBCT and Intraoral Scanning<br />

Figure 9: Full-depth surgical drill placed in metal guide holes of the surgical<br />

guide<br />

Figure 10: Implant delivery tool on the handpiece<br />

Drills) to match the implant fixture shape (Fig. 9). These<br />

drills were used to precisely create the osteotomy in all<br />

dimensions of space, including depth. Both implant sites<br />

were drilled to the precise depth and shape for planned<br />

implant placement.<br />

An 8 mm long NobelReplace ® Tapered RP implant (Nobel<br />

Biocare) was placed at the site of tooth #29, and a 10 mm<br />

long NobelReplace Tapered RP implant was placed at the<br />

site of tooth #30. Using the guided implant mount, the two<br />

respective implant fixtures were carried with the implant<br />

driver (Fig. 10) and rotated to a position just short of full<br />

depth (Fig. 11). Using a manual torque wrench, the implants<br />

were rotated into place such that the shoulder of the implant<br />

holder mated with the surgical guide at a torque value of<br />

35 Ncm (Figs. 12, 13). The guided mount and surgical guide<br />

were removed and 5 mm RP Healing Abutments (Nobel<br />

Biocare) were rotated into the NobelReplace Tapered RP<br />

implant (Figs. 14, 15). There were no complications, and<br />

in fact, the patient reported this was the easiest dental<br />

procedure performed on him to date.<br />

Figure 11: Placement of implant with the delivery tool with full depth held<br />

back approximately 1 mm<br />

Implant Restoration<br />

After four months of healing, the patient returned for<br />

restoration of the two implants. The healing abutments were<br />

removed (Fig. 16) and an Osstell ® ISQ implant stability meter<br />

with SmartPeg attachments (Osstell Inc. USA; Linthicum,<br />

Md.) was used to check the level of relative implant osseous<br />

integration (Fig. 17). A SmartPeg attachment was placed in<br />

each implant fixture and a reading of 85 was recorded for<br />

each implant. Further, a “reverse” torque test was performed<br />

using a manual torque wrench, with no movement<br />

at 35 Ncm. The implants were deemed satisfactory for<br />

restoration and functional occlusal loading.<br />

Figure 12: Manual torque wrench used for final seating of the implants to<br />

35 Ncm<br />

86<br />

– www.inclusivemagazine.com –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!