PDF file: Annual Report 2002/2003 - Scottish Crop Research Institute
PDF file: Annual Report 2002/2003 - Scottish Crop Research Institute
PDF file: Annual Report 2002/2003 - Scottish Crop Research Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Director’s <strong>Report</strong><br />
culturally-related services from outwith the UK; (e)<br />
associated implications such as livestock and human<br />
welfare, including access to foodstuffs; and (f) the<br />
standpoint of the author(s) where science, economics,<br />
and social perceptions can have a less-than-objective<br />
partnership. In the absence of well-developed markets<br />
for most environmental goods, any valuations can<br />
only be broad-brush, even where inferences are drawn<br />
from surveys of opinions; or from the behaviour of<br />
other markets subject to environmental influences and<br />
essentially assessing so-called ‘welfare impacts’; or<br />
judging surrogate measures based on goods that have<br />
market values, the usual example being the treatment<br />
of waste waters, costs that are driven by legislation.<br />
Agriculture’s damage to natural goods has been<br />
judged to be £1.566 billion in 1996 prices (J. Pretty,<br />
C. Brett, D. Gee, R. Hine, C.F. Mason, J.I.L.<br />
Morison, H. Raven, M. Rayment, and G. van der<br />
Bijl. An Assessment of the Total External Costs of UK<br />
Agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 65, 113-136, 2000);<br />
£1.072 billion at 1998 prices (O. Hartridge and D.<br />
Pearce. Is UK Agriculture Sustainable? Environmentally<br />
Adjusted Economic Accounts for UK Agriculture.<br />
CSERGE – Economics paper. September 2001); and<br />
£1.227 billion at 2000 prices with biodiversity, landscape,<br />
and human-health damage uncosted<br />
(Environment Agency. Agricultural and Natural<br />
Resources: Benefits, Costs and Potential Solutions. May<br />
<strong>2002</strong>). The positive environmental impacts of agriculture<br />
providing environmental services in the form<br />
of agricultural landscape, forest and woodland, environmentally<br />
sensitive areas, and Sites of Special<br />
Scientific Interest were estimated by Hartridge and<br />
Pearce to be £594.9 million per year at 1998 prices,<br />
and £955.5 million including the benefits of creating<br />
photosynthetically driven carbon sinks.<br />
Protected Land Areas Designated sites in the UK<br />
afford varying degrees of environmental protection by<br />
favouring land management practices that yield conservation,<br />
biodiversity and other related benefits (see<br />
Protected Areas and Species above). Collectively, the<br />
National Parks, AONBs and NSAs cover 21% of the<br />
UK land area, SSSIs and Areas of Special Scientific<br />
Interest (ASSIs) in Northern Ireland; cover 7.7% of<br />
the UK land area. Other protected areas include<br />
Ramsar (wetlands) sites, World Heritage sites, nature<br />
reserves, National Trust and <strong>Scottish</strong> National Trust<br />
lands, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones, and various agrienvironment,<br />
rural stewardship, and countryside management<br />
schemes. With modulation, the protected<br />
area is set to increase.<br />
IFM and Organic Agriculture Environmental protection<br />
is the focus in the UK of two types of agriculture:<br />
Integrated Farm Management (IFM) which is an<br />
holistic approach to minimise adverse environmental<br />
impacts but maintain efficient and profitable production,<br />
a system best exemplified by the Linking<br />
Environment and Farming (LEAF) scheme; organic<br />
farming, which has a more ideological basis, strictly<br />
regulating inputs and technologies, and focusing on<br />
soil fertility. Organic farming extended to 699,879<br />
hectares by June <strong>2002</strong> but in value terms represented<br />
a small part of UK food production.<br />
AIC Agricultural representation in the UK was<br />
changed in <strong>2003</strong> by the formation of the 365-member-company<br />
Agricultural Industries Confederation, a<br />
body that arose from the amalgamation of (a) the UK<br />
Agricultural Supply Trade Association (whose members<br />
produce circa 90% of the UK’s annual feed;<br />
account for more than 90% of the grain, oilseed, and<br />
pulses traded in the UK; and represent more than<br />
80% of the UK’s certified seed trade); (b) the<br />
Fertiliser Manufacturers Association (whose members<br />
comprise 95% of UK fertiliser producers); and (c) a<br />
group of distributors supplying more than 90% of the<br />
UK’s crop protection products as well as agronomy<br />
advice. The combined membership had a turnover of<br />
£6.5 billion.<br />
An Overview of Modern Agriculture<br />
The transfer from a nomadic hunter-gather existence<br />
to one of systematic and organised food and fibre production<br />
in settlements of durable housing, with people<br />
in stable social groupings deploying tools, keeping<br />
livestock, and cultivating crops, is widely thought to<br />
have begun about 9000-7000 BC in the Middle East,<br />
although there is evidence of crop cultivation in 9000<br />
BC in northern Thailand, and in 7000 BC in northeast<br />
Mexico. In terms of scale of operation, however,<br />
it is clear from archaeological evidence that the development<br />
of agricultural-dependent villages or settlements<br />
was most pronounced in the Middle East, in<br />
Iraq in about 6750 BC, in Greece in 6000 BC, and in<br />
Crete at around the same date. As the journalist A.<br />
Browne wrote in The Times in April <strong>2003</strong> during the<br />
war with Iraq, civilisation was thought to have started<br />
in the fertile plains between and around the Tigris and<br />
Euphrates rivers. The Bible is replete with references<br />
to early cities and sights that were built as a result of<br />
successful agriculture. The plough, the wheel, the<br />
chariot, picture-symbol records giving way to<br />
cuneiform and then a syllabic alphabet for writing, lit-<br />
63